In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, October 7, 2013

4764 - Despite Supreme Court order, no wages without Aadhaar card in Rajasthan village - The Hindu


Despite Supreme Court order, no wages without Aadhaar card in Rajasthan village
TILONIA (RAJASTHAN), October 3, 2013

Many MGNREGA workers in Tilonia village of Ajmer district are struggling to get their wages as they don’t have Aadhaar cards, this despite a recent Supreme Court order that said the unique IDs were not mandatory for accessing welfare schemes.

An order by the Postal Department in Ajmer, dated May 7, 2013, had instructed all sub-post masters to inform MNREGA workers that: “As per the orders of the Central/State government, after July 31, 2013, no payment would be made to MGNREGA accounts without an Aadhaar card.”

The order directed the workers to register their Adhaar numbers with their accounts. It said the workers would be themselves responsible for any inconvenience caused.

Soon after, the staff at the Tilonia post office started turning away workers who did not produce a copy of their Aadhaar cards.

“Well, we did not turn away everyone without an Aadhaar. We made payments to those workers who could at least produce their Aadhaar enrolment receipt, if not the card itself,” said Harkaran, the sub-post master.

When told about the Supreme Court order, he said he was aware of it but could not bypass the departmental order. “We have not received any new order, or even oral instructions, nullifying the previous order,” he said.Of the 5,000 MNREGA accounts at the Tilonia post office, only about a thousand are linked to Aadhaar. “The orders were strict. But I have to manage the situation here on the ground. I have been making payments to several account-holders based on my goodwill and personal relations,” the sub-post master said.

Dhaneshwari Devi, an auxiliary nurse midwife in Tilonia, has a similar arrangement with the beneficiaries of the Janani Suraksha Yojana, which provides cash incentives to pregnant women opting for institutional deliveries.
“We have been told the Aadhaar card is mandatory, but if the beneficiaries don’t have it, we don’t just turn them away. We work something out,” she said.
While this arrangement raises questions about the Aadhaar card’s necessity, it leads to the possibility of exclusion, resulting from the official’s subjectivity and bias.

“This illustrates two things. One, that it is possible to continue direct benefit transfers as long as people have bank or post office accounts. Two, while Aadhaar’s stated purpose was to reduce the power of middlemen [the post master in this case]; it is reinforcing their power in the intervening period when the accounts are seeded with the UID numbers. The government has created unnecessary confusion on the ground and added an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy,” said development economist Reetika Khera.

Kartar (35), a construction worker from Tilonia, has had a tough time getting his Aadhaar card made. “I went to the camps three-four times but was sent back every time. The babus asked me to apply cream on my palms and then come back. When it still didn’t work, they asked me to use mustard oil for some days but even then, the machine did not record my fingerprints,” he said.
Kartar said sarcastically that given the nature of his job, his palms don’t seem to have an “Aadhaar line”.