In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label NREGA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NREGA. Show all posts

Friday, June 29, 2018

13757 - Aadhaar linking boosts NREGS: Modi’s JAM trinity fast tracks workers’ payment disbursals - Financial Express


Narendra Modi government’s apparent insistence on mandatory linking with Aadhaar may have drawn criticism from various quarters with people raising eyebrows, but the project has given a big boost to rural employment by aiding assured jobs and quicker disbursals of payments under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS).

By: FE Online | New Delhi | Published: June 28, 2018 3:22 PM
28
SHARES




Aadhaar linking boosts NREGS

Narendra Modi government’s apparent insistence on mandatory linking with Aadhaar may have drawn criticism from various quarters with people raising eyebrows, but the project has given a big boost to rural employment by aiding assured jobs and quicker disbursals of payments under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS). The NREGS benefitted from faster wage transfers and easier allotment of work due to the biometric Aadhaar identification, which nearly 90% of the country’s population has already received, a study by the Indian School of Business shows.

NREGS, previously known as MNREGA, was floated in 2005 for the rural farming population, mainly to help the people tide over any farm distress due to harsh conditions, such as drought. The scheme mandates the state government to offer minimum 100 days of employment for at least one member of each family that asks for it.

“The interesting part of NREGA is that it does not have the biometric authentication requirement because the job card is directly linked to the Aadhaar and the bank account, the wages are paid directly into the bank, so there is no need for biometric authentication,” said professor Ashwini Chhatre, Executive Director, Indian School of Business.

JAM session
“We did not expect such a big effect,” Ashwini Chhatre told FE Online when asked if the researchers had expected this result. “What we thought was that expenditure will go up, because of the efficiency improvement — but not that it will be the opposite of what it was before or the change to be this swift. Even we did not expect this magnitude of difference!” he said.
NREGS was launched to increase employment opportunity during the times of distress, thus making it counter-cyclical. But after studying NREGA data of the Financial Years 2011-2017, it has been found that prior to the advent of JAM trinity of Jan Dhan Yojana, Aadhaar and Mobile linking, the employment scheme used to work in a procyclic manner. That is, average employment decreased with the increase of drought and distress.
The possible reason behind this is the long process of payment reimbursement by the government — which included gram panchayat, mandal, district administration and state government, which meant the workers had to work for days, practically without payment. Thus, many used to back out from availing the scheme or used to opt for schemes that would pay much less.
However, since the Jan Dhan Yojana, which covered 90 per cent of the country’s population under the mainstream banking system, and linking of the biometric identity proof of Aadhaar, the payment reimbursement has become faster and easier, and the scenario has changed. Since the introduction of Aadhaar-linked payment the blocks, where the study was conducted, showed a substantial increase of 19.21% in the number of households applying for the scheme during the time of adverse weather conditions or drought. The increase in the years unaffected by drought was 18.9%.
While the total fund dispersed in FY2015 was Rs 92 billion, it jumped to Rs 140 billion in the consecutive year when Aaadhaar was implemented — a significant jump of nearly 50% in a single year, stated the study. Persons and households working also increased by 12 and 17 per cent, stated the report.

The JAM trinity — linking of Jan Dhan Yojana, Aadhaar Card and Mobile phones — has led to the wages reaching the workers’ bank accounts within estimated 15 days of employment as compared to as long as a month previously, the study shows. Further, the direct transfer of wages to the bank accounts also facilitated into removing any caste-based bias that prevails in various parts of the country while it comes to payments, and even the amount of work done by the backward classes also increased subsequently, said the study.

Friday, April 20, 2018

13320 - Great Aadhar Game - Day After India




Through arbitrary subversion of legalities, government is turning us into random number generators. But, it would be interesting to know whether Benford’s Law applies here or not

By Asit Manohar

The Supreme Court’s interim order of March 13 appears incongruous to the earlier unanimous verdict on the right to privacy and is at odds with the constitutional right to equality. 

The deadline to link Aadhaar with bank accounts and phones have been indefinitely extended while they aren’t extended for any welfare schemes for the poor such as old age pensions and the rural job guarantee scheme, MNREGA.

This implies that Aadhaar will be voluntary for the rich while being mandatory to access critical survival measures for the poor. In other words, sadly, right to privacy seems to crucially hinge on the class position of a citizen. In essence, it reinstates the Orwellian cliche that some of us are more equal than others.

Be that as it may, this differential access to “freedom” implies that we can happily choose to file our taxes without Aadhaar. There is a small catch though. For some inexplicable and rather bizarre reason, nobody can file their returns electronically without an Aadhaar number.  The income tax returns website does not let you file your returns unless you furnish a 12-digit number. This seems to be in contravention of the March 13 interim order of the apex court. As such, even conscientious taxpayers, who do not have Aadhaar, are reportedly being forced to provide an arbitrary 12-digit number as a proxy for Aadhaar.

What does a diligent taxpayer who does not have an Aadhaar do in such a Catch 22 situation? Anecdotal evidence suggests that such taxpayers are trying out their hand at imagining a random Aadhaar number so that the system lets you submit your returns. The Centre, through arbitrary subversion of legalities, is turning us into random number generators. It is not the intention to suggest that anyone should do that, but it is in this context that it might be instructive learn about Benford’s law (also called First Digit Law). Perhaps it may help to learn how to imagine a “good” large random number?  Let’s get into some mathematical melodrama to learn one way to fake randomness in situations that deal with large numbers (12 digits, for example).

So, what is Benford’s law? Benford’s law states that in many real life situations when data is observed in high magnitude, more numbers begin with the digits 1, 2, or 3, as opposed to 7,8, or 9. For example, consider a 250-page book. There are about 109 pages whose page numbers begin with the digit 1 (pages 1,11-19,100-199), 60 pages beginning with the digit 2 while only 10 pages beginning with the digit 9. As another example — consider the number of people in various age groups. As a proportion of the population, chances are there are more people with ages that start with the digit 1 than with the digit 9. At first, Benford’s law appears to be counter-intuitive because if the distribution of the first digit in datasets are truly random, then each digit between 1 and 9 have the same chance, i.e., 1 out 9 (11.1%) of being the first digit, i.e., be uniformly spread.

However, the frequency distribution of beginning digits in many data settings indicates otherwise. In particular, this holds true for datasets that grow exponentially (doubles or triples) such as bacterial colony data, populations of cities, and not to forget income tax data. It is empirically observed that, on an average, the first digit is 1 in about 30% of the cases, it is 2 in about 17.5% of the cases, and it is 3 in about 12% of the cases. The systematic pattern of the first digit being further away from 1 continues and number 9 is the first digit in only about 5% of all the data points.

The fact is a consequence of digits in such datasets being non-uniformly spread on the original measured scale but uniformly distributed on a logarithmic scale – used to rescale exponentially growing data where the interest is more on the number of digits. Very simply, logarithms (log) tell us the number of digits after the first digit in a number. So log 10 = 1 and log 1000 = 3. It denotes the power to which a number is to be raised to get another number.

This phenomenon was first highlighted by the astronomer Simon Newcomb in 1881 when he observed that the initial pages of the logarithm tables were yellower and more smudged than the latter pages. This led him to conjecture that the logarithms of numbers beginning with the digit 1 were more prevalent than numbers beginning with higher digits. The same principle was later tested and verified across several datasets by the physicist, Frank Benford of GE Research in 1938. He tested the hypothesis by looking at surface areas of rivers, US population, numbers in Reader’s Digest magazine, street addresses of hundreds of people etc.

In the 1990s, researcher Mark Nigrini used Benford’s law to track accounting frauds by reviewing sales figures, insurance claims and reimbursement claims. For example, owing to a policy threshold of $100,000, a fraudster wrote several cheques to himself just below this threshold, i.e., with a first digit in the cheque amount being 9. This obvious departure from the expectation of 5% of numbers beginning with the digit 9 was a red signal to catch accounting fraud. Benford’s law has been similarly used to look at fudged numbers in income tax returns and is permissible as evidence for criminal cases in the US.
However, Benford’s law does not apply to data that that have been assigned. Consequently, this law will not apply to the oft-compared twin (quite incorrectly so) of Aadhaar-Social Security Numbers (SSN) in the US. The 9-digit SSN are not randomly generated but have a well-defined structure of assignation.
The questions for us is – given that Aadhaar is a 11-digit random number (the 12 is technically not), will Aadhaar numbers also follow Benford’s law? In case it does, then just to follow the Supreme Court order, and be a diligent citizen, should innocent people without Aadhaar have had to learn all this jugglery just to be “random”?

Recently, the central government/UIDAI’s lawyer claimed in the Supreme Court that Aadhaar data centres are kept protected inside walls that are “13 feet tall and 5 feet thick”. Given such strong and exemplary data security and data protection features, would one wish to be caught just because one sprinkled equal number of ones and nines to create a make-believe 12 digit number? Isn’t it absurd that we have to fake to establish honesty? Till the crimes of the state’s arbitrariness are brought to proper punishment, the so-called misdemeanour of randomness may continue.


Monday, April 9, 2018

13237 - The Deepening Crisis in MGNREGA Wage Payments - The Wire


For 2018-19, there is no increase in the MGNREGA wage rates of ten states.
             File photo of MGNREGA workers. Credit: Reuters


08/APR/2018

On May 1, 2016, many workers of Jharkhand returned Rs 5 to the prime minister – that year’s increment in the state’s Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) wage rate – to register their protest at the meagre increase. On the next Labour Day, they returned Re 1 – the amount by which the MGNREGA wage rates of Assam, Jharkhand, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand increased for 2017-18. Luckily for the workers, this year they will not have to return any money.

For 2018-19, there is no increase in the MGNREGA wage rates of ten states – Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Mizoram, Nagaland, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Some of these states are amongst the poorest in the country, where millions of rural workers fall back on MGNREGA when there is no other employment available in their area. But increasingly unremunerative wage rates, together with long delays in payments and denial of compensation in case of the delays has turned many workers away from the employment guarantee programme.

Unremunerative wage rates
Currently, MGNREGA wage rates of 29 states and union territories are less than their corresponding minimum wages. The gap is greatest in the Northeastern states of Tripura and Sikkim, where MGNREGA wages are only about 59% of the respective state’s minimum wage, followed by Gujarat (65%) and Andhra Pradesh (68%). The divergence between the two wage rates began in 2009, when the Central government activated Section 6(1) of the employment guarantee act to delink MGNREGA wage rates from the Payment of Minimum Wages Act. Since then, a situation of illegality is created wherein MGNREGA workers of several states are made to work at less than the minimum wage rate. As the employment guarantee act requires the Central government to bear the entire financial burden of MGNREGA wages, states are unwilling to use their own resources to ensure payment of minimum wages (with the exception of Bihar which spends some money to reduce the difference between the state MGNREGA wage rate and the state minimum wage).

In 2009, the Central government also capped MGNREGA wages at Rs 100 per day in nominal terms. With steep price increases, the real value of MGNREGA wages began to fall. To arrest this decline, the government implemented the emergency recommendation of the Central Employment Guarantee Council’s “Working Group on Wages” to index MGNREGA wages to the price level by using the Consumer Price Index for Agricultural Labourers. However, it did not revise the base wages, leading to stagnation of MGNREGA wages in real terms.
In 2015, the Mahendra Dev Committee recommended revising the base wages to the 2014 minimum wage rate or the MGNREGA wage rate of that year, whichever was higher. This committee also recommended switching to Consumer Price Index for Rural Labourers to adjust MGNREGA wages to the price level as it better represents the consumption basket of MGNREGA workers. This recommendation was repeated by the Nagesh Singh Committee constituted the following year to once again advise on the matter of MGNREGA wage rates (among other issues). Both times, the Ministry of Finance shot down the recommendation, presumably due to the financial implications. From 2012-13 to 2016-17, while the all-India average nominal MGNREGA wage rate increased from Rs 135 to Rs 176, the corresponding increase in the real MGNREGA wage rate was only Re 1.

Delays in wage payments
The real value of MGNREGA wages is further eroded by long and unpredictable delays in wages payments. MGNREGA wages are to be paid within 15 days of the work being done. From 2013-14 to 2016-17, less than half the Fund Transfer Orders (FTOs) – electronic payment advice for MGNREGA wages – were generated and signed on time. There are no official estimates of the full extent of wage payment delays, as the ministry considers wages to be paid once the FTO is signed.

Independent researchers have estimated the time taken till the crediting of wages in workers’ accounts. Based on an analysis of more than nine million wage payments made in 2016-17 across 10 states of the country, Rajendran Narayanan, Sakina Dhorajiwala and Rajesh Golani found that only 21% of the wage payments were made on time. They repeated their analysis for four million wage payments made from April to September 2017. This time they found a timely payment rate of 32% (as opposed to the official claim of 85%).

Many workers do not receive their wages at all, due to reasons such as administrative lapses and fraudulent withdrawal of wages from their post office or bank account. The mandatory requirement of linking the implementation of MGNREGA with the Management Information System (MIS) of the programme and Aadhaar has engendered new reasons for non-payment of wages. For instance, mistakes in entering details such as workers’ attendance, bank account number or Aadhaar number in the MIS can cost them their wages. In case of errors in seeding of Aadhaar numbers with bank accounts, workers’ wages can get credited in someone else’s bank account. Due to poor enforcement of norms of transparency and accountability, workers are seldom able to complain in case they do not receive their wages. Redressal of their grievances is even more rare.

Denial of compensation
As per the employment guarantee act, workers are entitled to compensation in case they do not receive their wages within 15 days of the work being done. The compensation amount is to be recovered from the functionaries whose lapses result in the delays. As per the initial provisions of MGNREGA, the rate of compensation was to be decided as per the Payment of Wages Act. This was later done away with and the rate of compensation was changed to 0.05% of the pending wages, per day of delay. Further, the ministry only calculates delays in the payment steps to be completed by the states, so till the FTO is generated and signed. It does not calculate delays in the steps which take place afterwards, which are the responsibility of the ministry itself and the payment agencies (banks and post offices). This has allowed the ministry to frequently withhold the approval of FTOs for weeks – even months in some cases – due to lack of funds, failure of states to comply with administrative requirements or other reasons that are not clear.
The compensation amount is automatically calculated by the MIS and electronically approved by the programme officer. The bulk of the compensation is rejected by these functionaries, as approval would require them and their colleagues to pay the compensation amount. Also, only a part of the approved amount is actually paid to workers. From 2013-14 to 2017-18, only 4% of the calculated compensation was approved and only 61% of the approved amount was paid.

Why the crisis
Much of the crisis in MGNREGA wage payments stems from the government’s unwillingness to allot an adequate budget for the employment guarantee programme. The most damning evidence of this is a Ministry of Finance document of August 2017 which states that if workers were to be compensated for the full extent of wage delays, it would significantly increase the government’s financial burden.

After stagnation – and even a fall – in Central government expenditure on MGNREGA from 2010-11 to 2013-14, expenditure on MGNREGA has increased over the past four years. However, this increase is only in money terms, and is just about 0.3% of the country’s GDP. Last August, the Ministry of Rural Development demanded an additional Rs 17,000 crore to supplement the initial MGNREGA budget of Rs 48,000 crore for 2017-18. The Ministry of Finance approved only Rs 7,000, that too in January 2018. As mentioned above, to ration the inadequate funds, the Ministry of Rural Development frequently delays the processing of FTOs for wage payments. This year’s MGNREGA budget is only Rs 55,000 crore – the same as last year’s total budget in nominal terms.

Since the Central government failed to dilute MGNREGA through covert measures such as restricting it to the poorest districts or reducing the wage to material ratio, it has resorted to underfunding the employment guarantee programme. MGNREGA now functions more as a project to meet the infrastructural requirements of other government schemes – such as Swacch Bharat Mission, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana and the Integrated Child Development Services – than as a right to work programme. Legal entitlements of workers are disregarded on the pretext of improving quality of assets and curbing leakages. It is hoped that the opposition parties, media and civil society is able to expose the central government’s lack of commitment towards the most marginalised rural workers in the months leading to the next general election.


Ankita Aggarwal works with the secretariat of the Right to Food Campaign.

Friday, February 16, 2018

12817 - Two people, same Aadhaar number; MGNREGA wage goes to wrong person - Mathrubhumi

Published: Feb 16, 2018, 10:40

Cheruthoni (Idukki): An Idukki native almost lost her hard-earned money under the rural employment guarantee scheme MGNREGA when her annual wage amoun...

Read more at: http://english.mathrubhumi.com/news/kerala/two-people-same-aadhaar-number-mgnrega-wage-goes-to-wrong-person-employment-guarantee-scheme-1.2607040


Wednesday, November 1, 2017

12187 - Lost in transition: Has linking Aadhaar to government welfare schemes made it difficult for beneficiaries to avail of aid? - Hindustan Times


Aadhaar is now compulsory for 87 government welfare schemes. HT reviews how this decision is working on the ground for two of the biggest schemes of this kind
LONG READS Updated: Oct 08, 2017 13:08 Ist


Niha Masih 
Hindustan Times



(Ravi Choudhary/HT PHOTO)
What does Anita, a slum dweller in Delhi, have in common with Muniya Devi, a villager in Jharkhand? They subsist on two of the government’s biggest social welfare schemes – the National Food Security Act (NFSA) and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA, also known as NREGA) respectively.
But both face exclusion from these rights guaranteed under law because of Aadhaar. Not because they don’t have an Aadhaar card but due to problems stemming from linking it to welfare schemes.
Last year, after the passing of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, the government has made Aadhaar compulsory for at least 87 government welfare schemes – from pensions and scholarships to fertilizer and LPG subsidy.
The main argument is that Aadhaar provides a foolproof mechanism to check fake or ghost beneficiaries, reducing corruption and saving money.
Through ground reports, RTI responses and court documents, HT reviewed the impact of this linkage to the schemes which the Centre spends most on – the NFSA, which provides subsidised ration to poor households and NREGA, which guarantees employment to rural households for at least 100 days a year.



The Missing Link To Getting Food Security
In April 2015, Tosif Khan, a fair price shop owner selling subsidised ration under the NFSA received a sleek Point of Sale machine from the Delhi food and civil supplies department. The government was testing new Aadhaar-enabled biometric machines and Khan’s shop in Chandni Chowk had been selected amongst 42 shops for the pilot project. Through the machines, the beneficiaries would get ration after their biometrics matched with those given for Aadhaar. The government claimed it would automatically weed out ghost or fake beneficiaries.
But Khan’s machine developed a snag and stopped charging about a year later. On September 8, he sent a one-line email to the central district’s assistant commissioner of food department, saying, “Sir, device mein charging nahi ho rahi hai” (Sir, the device is not charging). The reply came the same day. The terse email read: “To hum kya karein” (So what should we do?).
After that Khan went back to using manual entries for providing ration – exactly the opposite of what the pilot project was testing.



THE FACT ON FAKE
It was reported in April that the government had deleted many ‘fake’ NREGA job cards after verifying Aadhaars. An RTI filed by economist Jean Dreze, however, revealed that only four per cent of the job cards that were deleted were fake.

94,09,448
TOTAL NUMBER OF DELETED CARDS


He wasn’t the only one to face problems. Another shop-owner (speaking on the condition of anonymity) who runs a fair price shop near the Delhi airport told HT that lack of cellphone network was a perpetual problem in operating the machine.
In his case, when the machine developed a fault, the government directed him to the manufacturing company. The company in turn told him that their contract was over and hence they were not responsible. He too, then went back to manual entries.
The failure rate of the government pilot was more than 50 per cent – of the 42 shops where the machines were tested, only 18 remained till the end. Yet, the Delhi government is about to roll out mandatory use of machines at all fair price shops from November.
Delhi Food Commissioner, KR Meena dismissed these as standalone examples. He said there was not enough awareness within the department since the pilot was limited. “Last time, our contract with the company was only for a year, so there were maintenance issues with the machines. This time we have a five-year contract with BHEL. They will be required to provide repair work within two hours of any complaint,” he said.
But the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan says that unreliable machines point to a bigger problem – people who don’t get ration due to biometric failures or mismatch.
They estimate that in Delhi about 12 per cent of eligible beneficiaries may have been excluded in one year because of biometric failure. But the state government says they have no data on it.
To address the problems posed by the machines tested, the government is banking on more advanced ones. Meena says, “With the new machine, if fingerprint biometrics don’t match, there will be an iris scan mechanism. If even that doesn’t work, then a mobile-based pin system will be used where a one-time password will be sent to the beneficiary’s phone number.”

Slamming this, Anjali Bhardwaj of the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan, says reliance on untested technology to curb corruption is misplaced. “The pilot of the Delhi government showed several problems – including network connectivity, biometric failures and without explaining how these issues have been addressed they are scaling it up.”



But exclusion is not caused by machine failures alone. Thirty-year-old Anita, living in a slum in south Delhi has spent three years trying to get ration for her autistic son, Nitin. The nine-year-old child did not have an Aadhaar card when Anita applied.
She is unable to take up a job as Nitin cannot be left alone. The family depends on the erratic income of her husband who works as a labourer and monthly subsidised food grains. Anita made three trips to an Aadhaar enrolment centre before the child could give his biometrics.
“He used to get scared of the machine and run away. But after all that effort when the Aadhaar card came, I was told his name still cannot be added to the ration card as the quota was full,” says Anita as she tries to hold Nitin in her lap. She was also unable to avail disability benefits for Nitin due to lack of Aadhaar.
Several such stories came to light when the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan took the government to court in February this year against Aadhaar being made mandatory for ration.
The Delhi High Court in September directed the government to start providing ration to Anita’s children, along with 40 other affected families.

A relieved Anita asks, “Gareeb ka khana ek card ki wajah se lekar sarkar ko kya fayda hua?” (How has the government benefited by taking food from a poor person because of a card?)
(Parwaz Khan/HT PHOTO)

Aadhaar: A Hurdle To Getting Employment?
Muniya Devi, 23, from Bari village, about 90 km away from Ranchi, gave birth to her third child – Lalchand, three months ago. But within a week , she was making a train journey with her husband and children to neighbouring Daltonganj to find work.
While she and her husband broke stones at a construction site for ~200 a day, her eldest son looked after the youngest.They stayed there for two months to earn enough to survive the next few. “There was no other work in the village,” she says quietly. For unlettered and landless families living in remote villages, NREGA work has often been a lifeline. But when that dries up, they must move out.
With Lalchand slung on her tiny waist, she shows me her NREGA job card. According to the manual entry on the card, she last worked in December 2012 under the scheme. But it wasn’t only the lack of work that was the problem. Muniya’s card had been struck off the NREGA list in 2014 and the reason listed was “wants to surrender card”. Muniya stares perplexedly when I tell her. She has no idea when or how that happened. “We are not educated so I don’t know all this,” she mumbles.



James Herenz, of Jharkhand NREGA Watch, alleges that large-scale deletions happened when the state started linking Aadhaar with job cards. “To complete 100 per cent seeding of job cards with Aadhaar, those who didn’t have Aadhaar were simply struck off the list citing various reasons.” Almost two dozen villagers HT met from Bari had their names struck off with no knowledge of it. Total deletions from the village stood at 417. These deletions are important as the Centre has often cited that Aadhaar seeding with NREGA has helped to weed out fake or ghost beneficiaries. But ground reality suggests that many who lost their job cards were eligible for the scheme.
In April 2017, it was reported that the government had deleted over 90 lakh ‘fake’ job cards nationally. Verification involved checking the Aadhaar numbers of beneficiaries. But when economist Jean Dreze filed an RTI with the rural development ministry, only four per cent of the deletions turned out to be fake. Reetika Khera, economics professor at IIT Delhi says, “The focus on Aadhaar-linking in NREGA is a diversionary tactic, ignoring real problems such as difficulty in getting work, delayed wages and low wages.”
For Jharkhand, the RTI numbers show a similar trend. Of the 1.08 lakh deletions, only 2,675 were fake and 13,455 were duplicate. State NREGA commissioner, Siddharth Tripathi admitted that there were problems in the initial seeding exercise. “At that time there was no verification, only collection of Aadhaar data.” To rectify the problems of the first, the state launched a second drive. “Last August, we spent two months linking both Aadhaar and bank accounts to job cards. We helped people who didn’t have them to make new ones. Then, we ran a campaign in every ward to verify these,” says Tripathi.
The new exercise has resulted in deletion of 3.5 lakh cards. However, the department was unable to provide a breakdown of how many of these were fake and how many were deleted for other reasons.
Khera thinks the problem lies elsewhere, “Aadhaar can reduce ‘identity fraud,’ but the government has failed to honestly answer whether identity fraud is the disease that ails welfare schemes. Welfare needs Aadhaar like a fish needs a bicycle.”
Read more
  •  
  • After turning back 60,000 job seekers for lack of Aadhaar, MP govt offers re-test 


    •  
  • Nadella praises India’s digital leap, says Aadhaar rivals growth of Windows, Android, Facebook 




    •  
  • Deadline for obtaining Aadhaar for govt schemes, subsidies extended to Dec 31
  • Monday, September 18, 2017

    12067 - Why NREGA workers hate Aadhaar and blame Centre for 'slow poisoning' the scheme: Glimpses from Jantar Mantar - DNA

    NREGA workers have been staging a protest at Delhi's Jantar Mantar since September 11. 

     DNA WEB TEAM | Updated: Sep 15, 2017, 09:04 PM IST, DNA webdesk

    There are more than crore registered NREGA workers in India. The scheme that helps in generating rural employment is being killed, say the protesting workers at Jantar Mantar.

    If you rue over bad pay hike, sample this: This year the NREGA workers got lowest wage hike ever, measly Re 1 in some states.
    It is this pay 'hike' and number of other issues for which hundreds of NREGA workers have been staging a protest at Delhi's Jantar Mantar since September 11.

    These workers, who form the first line of rural job front, are now facing a bleak future.

    They have now brought their struggle to the Capital and are demanding an increase in wages and work days under the NREGA scheme.

    Most feel that the paltry pay hike in April is just a way by the Centre to kill the scheme.

    They also allege that the Centre is 'diluting' the NREGA scheme through budget cuts, low wages and delay in payments.
    "Its like slow poison to kill the National Rural Guarantee Act (NREGA)," said activist Anuradha Talwar.
    The women working under the rural employment scheme complained of low wages and delays in payments in their respective states.

    "I get 10-15 days in a month and the payments are never on time. The wages are also less than what is expected to be paid," said Galku Devi from Rajasthan.

    Under NREGA, workers from rural areas are guaranteed 100 days work. They are also eligible for a stipulated wage of Rs 192 per day within 15 days of completion of work.

    Nikhil Dey of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sanghtan said the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha, the umbrella organisation seeking improvement in implementation of the scheme, has raised the demand of hiking the wages to Rs 600 and increasing number of work days to 240.

    "NREGA wages have been held constant in real terms since 2009. In the last two years, the wages have increased by as little as one rupee per day in some states," he said.

    The activists also charged that the use of technology has further "hampered" smooth functioning of the scheme.

    "The workers as needed to get their numbers listed with Management Information System(MIS) and bank accounts where the wage payments are to be made. This is just one example how cumbersome it could make the scheme," said Professor Ritika from IIT Delhi.

    Another NREGA activist from Rajasthan, Mukesh, highlighted "glaring lapses" in social audit of the scheme and how, despite a demand from the rural workforce, no jobs were available for them.

    "After demonetisation, large number of workers have returned to their villages and want work. But, there is no work for them due to several reasons including budget cuts," he said.
    NREGA budgets have been "inadequate" for several years, Dey said.

    "After peaking at 0.6 percent(of GDP) in 2009-10, Central government expenditure on NREGA declined steadily to 0.3% in 2015-16 and 2016-17," he said.

    These workers also have another issue that may force government to rethink its digital future policy.
    Aadhaar card is yet another hurdle for them. Most feel that its unnecessary and slows down even the basic work.

    A Times of India report quoted one Tukaram from Madya Pradesh who angrily talked about how Aadhaar is being mandatory even for accessing basic amenities.

    He said the pregnant women in his village faced great difficulties to call the ambulance.

    "To call the ambulance on the 108 number, we have to produce evidence of Aadhaar registration. One woman worker forgot to carry her Aadhaar card to hospital and did not remember her number, and we were faced with delay in all services," the TOI report quoted him saying.

    From Madhya Pradesh to Delhi, the dislike for Aaadhar remains unchanged.

    According to the TOI report, Pushpa, a resident of Delhi, said, "This Aadhaar is killing people; whether it is access to ration or pension or hospital, nothing happens with it. It has become an excuse for government servants to not help."
    (With PTI input)

    12063 - Too good to be true: How MNREGA ‘improvements’ are actually costing workers their wages - Scroll.In


    Inability of local officials and infrastructure to cope with the complex technologies driving the scheme could be leaving lakhs of workers unpaid.

    Published Sep 15, 2017 · 07:30 am

    Reuters

    This year’s Economic Survey lists several “improvements” in the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act brought about since 2014-’15.

    Mostly, these “improvements” are technological initiatives – greater convergence with other programmes, “geo-tagging” of MNREGA assets. They have not made a difference on two of the stated purposes – timely payment of wages to workers and the creation of useful assets.

    Worryingly, ground reports suggest some of the initiatives lauded in the Economic Survey are, in fact, causing hardship to MNREGA workers, even costing them their wages.
    One such initiative is getting nearly four crore workers on the “Aadhaar Payment Bridge”. The Ministry of Rural Development has been hammering states to increase the proportion of MNREGA wages paid through this method – electronically transferred to the worker’s Aadhaar-linked bank account. This requires the worker to have both a bank account and Aadhaar, a 12-digit biometric-based unique identity number that the Indian government has made mandatory for availing a host of services and welfare benefits. The worker’s Aadhaar is seeded to NREGASoft, the central database of the programme.
    While payment not linked to Aadhaar requires details of the worker’s bank or post office account to be correctly entered in NREGASoft, Aadhaar-based payment adds an extra level of data processing – the unique identity number must be seeded to the database and linked to the bank account as well. Because errors creep into this two-step process – Aadhaar number is seeded to or correctly entered in only one of the systems – many workers are denied their wages.

    The Economic Survey notes that last year 95% of MNREGA wages were “paid into beneficiary accounts”. Since having a bank account is necessary for Aadhaar-based payments – cash payments ended in 2008 – the rural development ministry has been aggressively pushing for the workers to replace their post office accounts with bank accounts. Under pressure to increase the share of MNREGA workers with bank accounts, some local functionaries are assigning fictitious bank account numbers to the workers. For instance, in Jharkhand’s Chhattarpur last year, block-level MNREGA functionaries entered random numbers as workers’ account numbers in the central database. Vikas Sahyog Kendra, a non-governmental organisation working in Chhattarpur area, complained to the state Rural Development Department about 51 such cases but, nearly a year later, the administration is yet to rectify the account numbers of some of these workers. The workers are yet to receive their wages.

    Numbers don’t tell the whole story
    Another “improvement” is the verification of 68% of “active” job cards, that is, cards recording at least one day’s work in this or the three preceding financial years. While the merits of verifying job cards are unclear, the exercise is causing much disruption on the ground. In two panchayats alone, the cards of 80 workers were removed from the system without their knowledge.

    Since their names do not appear on Muster Rolls, which are now electronically generated from the central database, the affected workers cannot be employed under the scheme. However, as work often starts before the Muster Roll reaches the worksite, the workers whose cards have been deleted do not get paid for their labour.

    The Survey claims that because of these “improvements”, 48 lakh MNREGA schemes were completed in 2016-17 as against the annual average of 25-30 lakh schemes in the preceding 10 years. The source of these figures is NREGASoft. It is crucial to note that a project categorised as “complete” in the database need not necessarily be finished, or even exist on the ground.
    The rural development ministry is setting MNREGA targets in a top-down manner, which is contrary to the spirit of the Act, and then pressurising states to meet them, as this circular shows. Under pressure, MNREGA officials are categorising as “completed” unfinished projects, or those where the workers have not been paid. Since funds for a project cannot be released once it is listed as “completed” in NREGASoft, many workers lose their wages.

    MNREGA is increasingly being driven by technology. The shift from cash payments to bank or post office transfers, and then to Aadhaar-based payments was supposed to improve transparency and reduce leakages. While these objectives have been met to some extent, the inability of local functionaries and infrastructure to cope with the requirements of these complex technologies, along with the absence of an effective grievance redress system, is possibly leaving a very large number of workers unpaid every year.

    Earlier, the problems of missing attendance details and wrong account numbers could be fixed at the local level. Now, it requires the intervention of block-level functionaries, sometimes even district or state officials, who are beyond the reach of most of the workers.

    Absence of payment guarantee is an important reason for workers losing interest in MNREGA despite their need for employment. And this problem will likely fester until the central government rethinks its definition of “improvement”.
    Ankita Aggarwal is an independent researcher. This piece is based on her experience working as a consultant with the National Institute of Rural Development. She is associated with the Right to Food Campaign and NREGA Sangharsh Morcha.
    We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.

    12062 - MNREGA workers continue to protest - The Hindu


    NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 01:49 IST

    Carrying forward the five-day long protest at Jantar Mantar against low budget, poor pay and delays in payment, the workers of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Act (MNREGA) on Thursday staged a demonstration opposite the office of the Ministry of Labour.

    The demonstration lasted about 30 minutes, which led to a meeting at the Ministry of Labour by Anuradha Talwar, a renowned social worker and women rights’activist who led the protest.

    A group of people from the Morcha went to meet the Secretary for Rural Development to further press their demands. The workers are currently entitled to a wage of ₹192 per day within 15 days of doing the work.

    The issue of technical glitches was also raised, as many workers faced inconvenience using their Aadhaar cards. According to a report by ‘Rethink Aadhaar’, several workers from Uttar Pradesh suddenly stopped receiving their wages, and upon enquiry, they found that their Aadhaar cards had become ‘inactive’. Later in the evening, many protesters were picked by the police.


    Saturday, September 16, 2017

    12050 - ‘In MP, pregnant women need Aadhaar for ambulance’ - TNN

    TNN | Sep 13, 2017, 22:35 IST

    NEW DELHI: On the third day of the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha, hundreds of MNREGA rural workers gathered at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi to share concerns about hurdles caused by Aadhaar, a biometrics linked ID. 

    Aadhaar is being made mandatory even for access to essential services, even though evidence on the ground shows that it does not function with any measure of efficiency. 

    Tukaram of Jagrat Adivasi Dalit Sangathan, Madhya Pradesh, said that in his village, pregnant women faced enormous problems as delivery time approached. "To call the ambulance on the 108 number, we have to produce evidence of Aadhaar registration. One woman worker forgot to carry her Aadhaar card to hospital and did not remember her number, and we were faced with delay in all services." 

    Tukaram said linking of Aadhaar to health, education services and rations was creating enormous disruption. "We have to go multiple times and make payments repeatedly. First, we spend hundreds of rupees to make the card as operators ask for money. Then, workers have to go and link it. Aadhaar has become mandatory for almost everything now - from birth certificates to cremation rituals. Even to approach the district court, one has to produce Aadhaar." 

    Pushpa, a resident of Delhi, said, "This Aadhaar is killing people; whether it is access to ration or pension or hospital, nothing happens with it. It has become an excuse for government servants to not help."

    From Uttar Pradesh, some workers said wages under NREGA had suddenly halted. Workers said that the MNREGA MIS rejected their claims for wages, saying their Aadhaar had become "inactive". The Aadhaar Act states that government can "deactivate" any resident's Aadhaar for "any reason deemed appropriate" without giving prior notice. Problems in rural areas because of this are now huge.

    Nobody even tells us why it is inactive, said Norti Bai from Ajmer in Rajasthan.

    Vikas Ojha from Uttar Pradesh said Aadhaar database demographic details are full of errors, and the centres charge bribes for updating information.

    Norat Mal from Tilonia, Ajmer, said 40 workers from his village had found that their wages under MNREGA were held up as their Aadhaar was "inactive". Daaku Devi from Jawaja, Ajmer, said the fingerprints of the elderly are not read by the software. "Several old people cannot access pension anymore," she said. Indira from Rajsamand, Rajasthan, said it was not like fingerprints once captured in the software stay the same. "We are all people who work with our hands, and the calloused fingers do not always throw up the same fingerprints. The POS machine fails to recognize that what it captured a long while back was actually just another version of what our prints have since become," she said. 


    Wednesday, September 13, 2017

    12036 - ‘Centralisation, focus on tech undermining MGNREGA’ - Hindu Businessline

    OUR BUREAU

    Nikhil Dey of the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha

    Concerns flagged over delay in wages, absence of grievance redressal

    NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 11:  

    Citing cases of Aadhaar linkage with wrong accounts, delayed and inadequate wages, especially to thousands of women, preparation of muster rolls in English and centralisation of the programme, workers and organisations from across the country are on dharna in Delhi to reaffirm their “legal entitlements’ under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

    “Even based on the (Rural Development) Ministry’s incomplete method of calculation of wage delays, barely half of all NREGA wage payments were made on time (i.e. within 15 days) in the past five years,” said Nikhil Dey of the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha, a country-wide coalition of organisations and individuals, at a press conference here on Monday.

    Sakina Dhorajiwala, an independent researcher, said according to their recent analysis of over 90 lakh wage payments made in 2016-17 in a random sample of 3,446 Gram Panchayats across 10 States, only 21 per cent of wage payments were actually made on time.

    Often vouchers are made and are counted as wages paid, she said, adding that the government was not calculating the delay which actually meant erosion of real wages.

    As per the Act, all NREGA wage payments must be made within a week, and under no circumstances later than 15 days of doing the work.

    Richa Singh from Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh, said there were several cases of wrong Aadhaar linkages leading to wage transfer to some other account.

    “Complaints have been made at all levels, but there is no redressal. So, where is the transparency”, she said.

    Technology is undermining NREGA and Aadhaar and is, in fact, making things less transparent. In some cases, it has taken more than a year to find out where the problem lay. Earlier, you could go to a person and complain, said Reetika Khera, a social scientist from IIT Delhi, adding that the push for technology started during UPA-II. MGNREGA, which remains a lifeline for rural households, boosting rural wages and purchasing power, is under-funded, as its budgets have been inadequate for several years, said Dey.

    After peaking at 0.6 per cent in 2009-10 (as a proportion of GDP), Central government expenditure on NREGA declined steadily to 0.3 per cent in 2015-16 and 2016-17.
    “This year’s (2017-18) NREGA budget is also grossly inadequate – while half of the financial year is left, 75 per cent of the funds allocated for this year have already been spent with no indication from the Ministry of Finance of any supplementary budget,” said the Morcha, which is demanding a hike in wage rate to ₹600 and the number of days of guaranteed work to 240 days per person.

    (This article was published on September 11, 2017)

    Wednesday, September 6, 2017

    11987 - Cash crisis: Not many takers for work under National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in villages of Andhra Pradesh - Indian Express


    By Express News Service  |   Published: 03rd September 2017 08:21 AM  |  


    NELLORE: Majority of the workers here are not showing any interest to attend the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) works being provided by the government due to pending payments. They are facing severe trouble as the government has failed to make payments for the last 10 weeks across the district. Currently, 40,000 workers are attending NREGS works this month against 70,000 in June and July. The government is yet to pay about `44 crore to the daily wagers across the district. According to sources, there are 5,81,009 job cards in 931 panchayats under 46 mandals in the district. Nearly 32,754 Shramasakti unions and about 5,30,508 labourers have been working under NREGS. The government has been paying `110 to `140 to each worker for their works on a daily basis.

    Different construction works have been taken up under NREGS such as burial grounds, rain water harvesting pits, Neeru-Chettu, bore wells, sports stadiums, Panta Sanjeevini and Anganwadi buildings, among others. About 85,000 labourers have to work to complete different works under NREGS across the district. “The government has failed to pay wages for the last three months. We are moving to other works as we are getting wages on a daily basis.

    There is a need to provide wages in this festival season,” said K. Sivamma, a worker from Gudur sector. Normally, authorities have to deposit wages into the accounts of workers within four days after the completion of works. “We are not getting answers from the staff about the wages. Though, we have done works under NREGS, the government has failed to provide wages on time. We are facing severe trouble as we have to rely only on wages,” said K. Aruna, a worker from Kovur.

    Officials are yet to pay `5.49 crore under Atmakur sector, `11.05 crore under Gudur and `8.94 crore in Kavali. Some of the workers have not linked their Aadhaar cards with their bank accounts. “Though workers have done works under NREGS, the government failed to provide wages on time. Majority of the workers in Udayagiri, Atmakur and also in upland areas are facing severe trouble, as they have only NREGS works.

    11984 - Villagers fume over non-payment of wages in Eluru of Andhra Pradesh - Indian Express

    By Express News Service  |   Published: 03rd September 2017 08:20 AM  |  

    NREGA work in progress in Srikakulam even though many of the workers haven’t got their wages for the last few months | Express

    ELURU: The Centre’s apathy has dealt a big blow to the workers of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) in West Godavari district. As the funds from the Centre have not been released to the district, the workers are almost starving for the last few months.The Centre has introduced NREGS to provide 100 days work to the poor labourer in the villages in a year when they have no other work. This scheme was implemented in the district and the State government engaged several daily labours in de-silting drinking water tanks, canals, and construction works of roads in rural areas during the summer season when they do not have work.

    The scheme has been handed over to the District Water Management Agency (DWAMA). The DWAMA has identified 6.50 lakh people as daily labour in the district. The DWAMA has to pay `197 per day. However, on an average, the DWAMA officials paid `140 to the labour. So far, 4 lakh labours were there for the NREGS works. The payment is calculated on the quantity of work done by the labour. During the 2016-17 financial year, the government released `192 crore to the labours. However, from July this year, the Centre did not release the funds under NREGS. About 18,000 labours of NREGS who have bank accounts did not link up the Aadhaar numbers. These labours were to receive `1.36 crore from the government and this amount has been stopped due to non-linkage of Aadhaar to the accounts.

    The Government has directly credited the wages to the labours who have linked their accounts to Aadhaar in the district. The wages have been stopped to the workers for the last three months i.e., June, July and August and about `15 crore have to be credited to the labours account. Earlier during start of the NREGS, a private organisation SINO paid the wages to the labourers directly in cash. Later, after some time, the workers were asked to open postal savings accounts. The labours get their pay-in-slip at the post office and get the cash whenever they completed their work. After that, the government asked the officials to open bank accounts for every NREGS worker in the district. The NREGS workers who opened the accounts are in a state confusion as to when their wages will be credited. Whether the amount has been credited is unknown and when they ask banks, they do not get a reply.

    P Nagaiah, a daily labour of Komadavole village, said that over the last few months he is doing NREGS works. “I am totally in confusion over my wages. Whether the amount was credited in the bank or not I have no idea. Even I tried to ask the bank officials about my wages. They are scolding me whenever I ask,” he said. He said earlier, “We got the amounts through post offices and regularly received the money.” He requested officials to implement the post office account scheme again for their wages.

    M Prabhakar Rao of Chataparru said, “I did the work daily and fully. I got only `80 to `100 per day for the work. The officials have not paid the full amount of `197. I have no alternative as there is no work outside except the NREGS. But I did not receive the wages over the last three months. How do we eke out our livelihood if the government does not pay the wages”, he asked.The DWAMA Project Director Mullapudi Venkata Ramana said that `15 crore has to to be paid to the workers as wages. The Centre has to release the funds and it will be paid within two or three days. This amount will directly be deposited in the accounts of the workers of NREGS. About 6 lakh workers are engaged in NREGS works.

    Wage woes hound workers, dues mount to L54 crore
    Kakinada:
    The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) work has come to grinding halt in East Godavari district due to non-payment of wages worth H54 crore. The work of NREGA came to a halt in the district in June 2017. Official sources said that over 15.16 lakh NREGA cards had been issued in the district of which 8.6 lakh cards were individual employment cards. During the year, 17,629 cards had been issued so far under NREGA. Officials informed that 130 lakh work days had been provided during the year.
    From December 2016 to May 2017, the Centre had granted Rs 231 crore as against the actual payment due which was at H285 crore, sources said. An NREGA worker, Dasari Veera Raghavaiah of G Vennavaram village, said that no work had been given under NREGA since June 2017. DWMA Project Director T Rajakumari said that pending funds would be released by two or three days. As soon as funds received, arrears would be disbursed. She said that NREGA work is being carried out in the district and 40,000 workers were working at various places.



    Tuesday, May 23, 2017

    11455 - Govt’s push to link Aadhaar-based payments with MNREGA yet to succeed - Hindustan Times

    Only 44% of 10.2 crore workers received payments under the Centre’s rural job scheme till April 2017
    INDIA Updated: May 22, 2017 07:43 Ist


    Hindustan Times, New Delhi

    The Aadhaar-based payment system promises transparency, faster disbursement, and an easier verification process.(HT File Photo)

    Amid the NDA government’s rush to expand the Aadhaar horizon, the unique identity-based payments in rural job scheme is yet to taste success.

    Only 44% of 10.2 crore workers in the Centre’s rural job scheme (MNREGA) received payments through the Aadhaar-based system till April 2017, in a stark reminder that the daily wage payment system in the country’s biggest work programme has a large scope of improvement.

    The Aadhaar-based system promises transparency, faster disbursement, and an easier verification process.
    Ironically, 84% MNREGA workers have Aadhaar cards and the details are available with the rural development ministry.
    While 8.58 crore workers have voluntarily given their Aadhaar number to the ministry, only 4.5 crore people are being paid their daily wages through the system.

    Government sources claim that the problem is at the level of the banks, which do not have infrastructure to link the Aadhaar numbers in time to the payment system.

    “For seeding the unique identity number with the bank accounts, the worker needs to go to the bank again and fill up forms and go through an entire process. In most of the banks, there are just one or two people to do this work of seeding,” said rural development secretary Amarjeet Sinha.

    The government also claims that the situation has considerably improved from the UPA-era when only 22.69 lakh workers were covered under the Aadhar-based payment system. “Till December 2014 just 3.1 crore workers had Aadhaar number. Now we have 8.58 crore workers covered,” said Sinha.

    The activists, however, maintain that while the government is eager to use Aadhaar for a wide range of areas and making it mandatory for receiving benefits, it has not paid attention to plug these loopholes.

    Monday, May 22, 2017

    11445 - In welfarist TN, Aadhaar is a gamechanger but with glitches - The Hindu


    SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT
    MAY 20, 2017 23:24 IST


    Reaching full benefits: Nearly 1.2 crore MGNREGS job cards have been issued in the State that has a population of over 7 crore. Villagers from Kambur panchayat in Villupuram district watering the saplings.   | Photo Credit: B.Jothi Ramalingam

    By seeding its extensive PDS and job guarantee scheme with Aadhaar, the State is in the forefront of implementing a national reform

    In March of this year, the Tamil Nadu government announced that the transport department has made it mandatory for the Regional Transport Officers in the State to compulsorily obtain, from vehicle owners, details including mobile numbers, Aadhaar and PAN numbers while registering new vehicles. This was only among the most recent of a range of initiatives taken up in Tamil Nadu to make Aadhaar the one-stop identification tag for all its residents.

    Tamil Nadu may well be a test case for how Aadhaar-based identity verification can have an impact on reaching welfare benefits to the people, reducing leakages and potentially corruption too. The State’s Public Distribution System (PDS) is universal and offers free or subsidised commodities to practically the entire population. Besides a number of schemes including old-age pension and marriage assistance to women, the State also boasts of leading in the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS).

    ALSO READ

    Tamil Nadu has embarked on a mammoth programme to seed its PDS and the jobs scheme with Aadhaar. In PDS, the State government plans to give “smart” cards — Aadhaar-seeded ration cards that can be accessed online — to all its 1.95 crore card holders by the end of June. Aadhaar linkage has helped the State weed out at least 60 lakh bogus ration cards from its rolls. Further, the State is home to more than 1 crore people who possess job cards under MGNREGS, and payments under this scheme come under Aadhaar too.

    As a result, the talk in towns and villages across the State often turns towards Aadhaar now. Most people that The Hindu spoke to see Aadhaar as an enabling technology that will simplify the identification process.

    They also understand that they have to comply with it so their welfare benefits will continue to flow in. Many do understand that because of Aadhaar they may not have to pay middlemen. But many have also experienced or have heard of others for whom the benefits stopped coming in, and they were unsure whom they should approach. Their first thought was that the bank that had their accounts was at fault but later realised that bank officials have little to do with money getting into their accounts.

    Many villagers in Salem said that they were happy to be part of a transformation brought about by technology. Instead of producing various documents in government offices for obtaining welfare scheme benefits, Aadhaar number is accepted everywhere, for opening bank accounts and getting the monthly pension, said K. Sampath of Omalur.

    ALSO READ

    “We do understand the benefits of the Aadhaar card. The problem arises when it is insisted or made mandatory, especially at a time when the mechanism for enrollment is not adequate and issue of cards is happening at a slow pace”, says R.V. Gowri Narayanan, a resident of Peelamedu in Coimbatore.

    M. Ramani adds that incorporation of corrections such as address change or phone numbers should also be made easy and the entire process should become people-friendly.
    S Mariappan, a tea estate worker in the Nilgiris, said that he had no proof of identity other than a family card till he was recorded under the UIDAI scheme. He said that the card was useful to avail benefits, and the sign up process was relatively simple. For R. Johnson from Gudalur, the Aadhaar card helped to get him a passport after most of his documents were destroyed due to rain. “I only had my family ration card with me, and I needed to apply for a passport. I then applied for an Aadhaar card and got it within a few weeks,” he said.

    “I got my Aadhaar card as officials insisted on it to continue in the payroll of the rural job scheme. Whether it is for getting the Old Age Pension, opening bank account, getting LPG gas connection, or receiving smart cards, officials now insist on Aadhaar cards. Otherwise, it has brought no real change in my life,” says S. Chellammal, 45, of Navalnayakanpatti near Thogamalai in Karur district.

    K. Palaniammal (60), another MGNREGS beneficiary, says only because of the Aadhaar drive she opened a bank account. “Before getting Aadhaar card I had never visited the bank for anything. Nowadays, I am frequently visiting my bank to operate my account. In a way, it has complicated my day-to-day schedule. However, I feel that my money is in safe hands. No one else can operate my account as it is Aadhaar-linked now,” claims Ms. Palaniammal.

    Enthusiasm among farmers
    Farmers say that crediting of subsidies through the Aadhaar-linked bank accounts has been beneficial to them. Many say the role of intermediaries has been checked now.

    “My Aadhaar-linked account was recently credited with ₹7,500 by way of input subsidy given by the State government in the wake of the drought. Similarly, I received subsidy to the tune of ₹1.35 lakh for setting up a drip irrigation system on my field. I feel Aadhaar has improved the level of transparency,” said P. Poomalai, a marginal farmer of Arungal village in Ariyalur district.

    V. Sathyanarayanan, a farmer belonging to Seruvamani village in Tiruvarur district, says: “We understood that the governments will make access to social security and farm subsidy benefits difficult without Aadhaar and savings bank account. So most of us got the Aadhaar cards in the beginning itself. Later, the bank asked for my Aadhaar to continue transactions, ration shops asked for the cards of all family members, and the Centre insisted on Aadhaar for disbursing the crop loss compensation two months ago.”

    “Though the primary agricultural cooperative societies do not stress on Aadhaar, they might insist on the cards soon, we believe,” he said.

    Starting June 1, farmers would also have to produce their Aadhaar cards for purchasing fertilizers from fertilizer dealers or primary agricultural cooperative societies. “The governments believe that input piracy, hoarding and fleecing of farmers would be prevented using Aadhaar-linked direct transfer of benefits to the farmers. We are happy that we can remit the amount less the subsidy to the fertilizer dealer on any buy,” said a farmer V. Jeevakumar of Budalur.

    Undoubtedly, Aadhaar has eased some processes — in most areas, things like getting a mobile phone connection or a data card have become easy. M. Thirupathi of Sengattampatti in Nilakottai, Dindigul district, says he is a beneficiary. “With this Aadhaar card, I bought a SIM card without any hassles. Earlier, sales personnel would demand photo and residential proof. And would take forever. Now, it is just the Aadhaar and your thumb print.”
    Officials of the Department of Registration in his region demand only an Aadhaar card for land registration, patta transfer and name transfer, says A. Perumal, a farmer from nearby Athoor. An Aadhaar card, in his opinion, simplifies complex procedures.

    Starting with LPG
    The Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG (DBTL) scheme for LPG consumers, which was later renamed as Pahal, was the first application of Aadhaar-based transfer of benefits to the bank accounts of beneficiaries.

    As of May 2017, in Tamil Nadu, 87% of 1.72 crore LPG consumers have linked their LPG IDs with Aadhaar, enabling subsidy transfer by the Central government to their bank accounts. “Though there were many teething problems since at least three agencies are involved in the process, by and large the system works,” said a person, who was initially involved in implementing the scheme.

    Senior citizen C. Selvaraj of Chennai, who wanted the LPG subsidy to be debited to his wife M.S. Latha’s account since the gas connection was in her name, simply linked the Aadhaar number to her account. “I did not go to the agency or bank but did it online and from the next month, her account started to get the subsidy,” he said.

    R. Siva, a farmer from Nattamangalam in Madurai, was sent back and forth between the bank and the gas company for nearly a month when his elderly aunt did not receive the gas subsidy for a few months. The issue was resolved after she submitted a fresh application and re-linked Aadhaar with her bank account. “The DBTL website still has options for both Aadhaar-based and non-Aadhaar based cash transfers. As per the website, those who do not have Aadhaar just have to provide their bank details. However, none of the gas companies accept that and insist on Aadhaar, failing which they do not credit subsidies,” said S.S.A Basha, who runs a tea shop in Tahsildhar Nagar in Madurai.

    Scepticism among the poor
    The experience of MNREGS beneficiaries may well determine how effective Aadhaar will be in helping the poorest of people.
    On a recent morning, an MNREGS job site in Chitthandapuram in Anchetty panchayat in Krishnagiri was abuzz with chatter. Some 120 women workers were huddled around the site’s work-man supervisor Rukmadhan, holding out a clutch of documents: ration card, MGNREGS job card, bank pass book, and an Aadhaar card. Pachayamma Sevathagownder’s bank pass book also had a photocopy of Aadhaar attached to the front of the book. Her card declares, in Tamil: “Aadhaar - Saadharana Manidanin Urimai” (The common man’s right). But the pages of her bank pass book were blank.

    Did she feel powerful with Aadhaar, like the slogan says? “Now, we carry another paper, that’s all,” she laughed. Women chimed in complaining about the delay in wages exceeding six months, saying their hopes of getting their rightful wages have been belied. “Earlier, our wages were distributed right at the job site and every Saturday,” they said, adding those who have received their wages clocked 150 days, yet only ended with ₹2,000 to ₹3,500.

    Said supervisor Rukmadhan, “I fill their attendance slip, but when they go to the bank, they find they have been paid far less than what is due.” The bank will not even fill their pass book saying their pass books are dirty and the printer would be ruined, the women said.

    “Every day, women come here and ask us, why their account has less money. How would we know? Aadhaar is only to eliminate identity fraud. The transparency that has to come from the BDO’s office to the panchayats has not happened,” said a manager of a rural bank branch in Krishnagiri.

    Corruption finds new ways
    It is tough to tell how old Maadhamma actually is. Squatting outside a Scheduled Tribe colony of Poosaripatty in Kottayur Panchayat in Thally, some 139 km from Krishnagiri, she said: “The OAP is ₹1,000, but the man takes ₹100 and gives me the rest,” she said of the business correspondent (BC), who hands out the old age pensions(OAPs) to that panchayat.
    BCs were engaged by banks to deliver MNREGA wages and OAPs in the panchayats using point of sale devices through biometric authentication. But, soon, the Aadhaar-based biometric authentication on the field fizzled out for various reasons. “The rural folks do hard manual labour. Our biometric kiosks are hyper-sensitive, often failing to capture the biometric detail of the hardened hands,” said a bank manager in Anchetty. Also, there were complaints of pilferage by BCs. So, OAPs alone were retained for delivery at panchayats by the BCs,he said.

    With inputs from P.V.Srividya in Krishnagiri, Pon Vasanth Arunachalam in Madurai, C. Jaishankar in Tiruchi, L. Renganathan in Thanjavur, R. Vimal Kumar in Tirupur, D. Raju in Dindigul, S. Senthalir and S. Prasad in Puducherry, and Deepa H. Ramakrishnan in Chennai