In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label PDS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PDS. Show all posts

Thursday, June 7, 2018

13660 - Mail Today Impact: Aadhaar woes over for Badarpur senior citizen - India Today


  • Adila Matra
  • New Delhi
  • June 6, 2018
  • UPDATED: June 6, 2018 08:26 IST
  • FOLLOW
  •  EMAIL AUTHOR

HIGHLIGHTS
  • 68-year-old Samiuddin was denied ration and pension due to Aadhaar card mismatch
  • He didn't get his pension for seven months
  • The authorities swung in action after Mail Today report
Mail Today had reported the story on April 8, 2018

Sixty-eight-year-old Samiuddin, a resident of Badarpur in south Delhi, was denied ration and old-age pension because his finger-prints did not match his Aadhaar card that was procured four years ago.

For seven months, Samiuddin had not received pension and the bank officers had told him it could either be a telephone number or fingerprint mismatch.

MAIL TODAY carried his story in the report titled 'Aadhaar: An Age Old Problem' on April 8, 2018. The Delhi Minorities Commission picked it up and issued notice to the Aadhaar Authority and the food and civil supplies department of the Delhi government. Samiuddin's problem has now been solved.

Said Zafarul-Islam Khan, Chairman of Delhi Minorities Commission, "We issued a notice to both the Aadhaar Authority (UIDAI) main office at Pragati Maidan and the food and civil supplies department. Aadhaar office sent a quick notice to release his pension immediately. Both pension and food supply departments have been asked to resume Samiuddin's benefits and accept any alternative identity proof in such cases."
Khan said they expedited the process because he was an elderly man with low income. He also added that the pension would reach Samiuddin's account monthly. "The ration would also resume. We will get in touch with Samiuddin to inform him of the same since the PDS officers sometimes forget to do that," Khan adds.


Khan says this will hopefully also solve the problem of thousands like him across the country who are facing difficulties to access welfare schemes due to mismatch of their fingerprints with that of their Aadhaar cards. "Any other minority victim of this mismatch may obtain an Aaadhar Authority order from the office Delhi Minorities Commission office in Vikas Bhawan," he added. "This order lets the victim use any other alternate ID to access various welfare schemes."

Monday, May 28, 2018

13604 - At the mercy of ‘fingerprint gods’: How rural Karnataka struggles for food due to Aadhaar - News Minute

Aadhaar


With their ration linked to Aadhaar, residents say they’ve had to forego their monthly staples – the fingerprints don’t match or there isn’t enough connectivity to process their biometrics.

Doddamma at her residence in Arabala in Chikkamagaluru district

The road through Chikkamagaluru district, located in the foothills of the Western Ghats in the Malenadu region of Karnataka, is unrecognisable but for the sight of mountains of varying sizes around you. Parched fields and dried up streams paint an ominous picture of a region reeling under severe water shortage. “It has been like this for the last two years. Usually, there would be onion cultivation around March but farmers have given up on cultivating until the rains come again in June,” says Rajappa (45), a resident of Arabala, a tiny village in Tarikere taluk of the district.

Inside their cramped house, Rajappa sits across from Doddamma who simply smiles when she is asked how old she is. “Some say I am over 90 but the truth is we never kept track of birthdays in my time,” she says. Doddamma is entitled to seven kilograms of rice as per the government’s Public Distribution System (PDS) scheme, but ever since the scheme was linked to Aadhaar, the biometrics-based database that assigns a unique 12-digit number to every resident of India, Doddamma says that she leaves the fate of her monthly ration up to the ‘fingerprint gods’. 

For almost a year now, Doddammaa has had to go to the PDS shop in Bhoothanahalli, around 4 kms away, to match her fingerprint against the biometric data stored in the Aadhaar database before she is given subsidised food grains. “It does not match sometimes and there have been months when I have not received ration because of it,” she says with exasperation. 

In search of stable internet
Jagadisha Shenoy, who manages the PDS shop in Bhoothanahalli, echoes Doddamma’s words and lays the blame on the biometric-based authentication system for denying ration to several people who are entitled to it. “The internet never connects here and we have tried several ways to solve this issue. Last year, we did the biometric authentication on our roof where we got connectivity through mobile hotspot on Reliance Jio. But when it stopped working abruptly, we had to go all the way up the hill and do the authentication near the Garagadahalli temple,” laments Jagadisha.



PDS Shop at Bhoothanahalli in Chikkamagaluru district.
In their attempts to find a stable and secure internet connection, Jagadisha and his aides have toured several places in and around Bhoothanahalli, setting up shop at odd spots on the side of the road or on top of a hill, to do the biometric authentication process. “We have toured all the places around our village – Arsinaghatta, Garagadahalli and even Antargatte which is 7 kms away - with the laptop and biometric authentication device in-hand in search of stable internet. It is not just the people receiving ration who are troubled but even I am facing difficulties,” adds Jagadisha

Residents in Arabala remember the days when they had to trek for a few kilometres up the Arsinaghatta hill at the end of their day’s work to complete their biometric authentication and avail subsidized food grains. “PDS shops usually start fingerprint authentication in the evening around 6 pm, but due to the lack of internet connectivity, we sometimes had to wait till midnight or 1 am to give our fingerprint. We would climb the hill after work and it would be a problem for women to venture out late,” says Shivamurthy, a coolie and resident of Arabala.



Arshinaghatta hill in Chikkamagaluru district. PDS Sellers climbed the hill in search of stable internet.
Shivamurthy, and many others like him in Arabala and its neighbouring villages, have sometimes had to set aside 3-4 days of the month for a process that took “a few hours at most” in the past. It also meant a loss of Rs 700 to 800 every month while they stood in line to avail their ration. "Often, the internet never works or there is a power cut and we have to come again the next day. There are times I have gone 3-4 days and waited to give my fingerprint," Shivamurthy adds.  

The race to get ration
Around 40 kilometres away in Neeladanahalli, Parvathi had not received ration in the last few months. She stopped receiving ration as she had not linked her Aadhaar card to her ration card and in spite of repeated attempts to make an Aadhaar card, she was unsuccessful as officials could not record her biometric data.

While two other members of her family receive ration, Parvathi and Chandana, her 7-year-old niece, have to make do with the money they make from coolie work during the month. “All the money I earn is spent on food. I cannot buy anything else,” she says with a tone of resignation.



Parvathi, a resident of Neeladanahalli, has not received her monthly ration due to a lack of an Aadhaar link.
While Aadhaar linkage is the stumbling block for Parvathi, other residents of the village also complain that the nearest ration shop in Jodi Lingadanahalli was open on only 3 or 4 days of the month, leading to a ‘race’ between residents to take their cut of the ration every month. 

“Ration used to be distributed by Ramdas Anna before but since the biometric system started, new people have started distributing the ration. They come only on select days in a month without informing in advance and people from six villages have to rely on word-of-mouth to know that ration is being distributed,” says Hegappa (62), a resident of Neeladanahalli

Heggappa’s claims are supported by data from the state’s Food and Civil Supplies Department’s comprehensive state-wide data on ration distribution which shows that ration was distributed in Jodi Lingadanahalli on only four days in March and April 2018. When TNM visited the shop in March, it was closed.



PDS Shop at Jodi Lingadanahalli. It was closed when TNM visited it in March
Led by Heggappa, residents of Neeladanahalli are currently fighting a case in the Chikkamagaluru district court against the PDS sellers in Jodi Lingadanahalli accusing them of illegally denying ration.

'No Aadhaar, no ration'
Ration is often denied for three predominant reasons – beneficiaries don’t have Aadhaar cards, they have not linked their Aadhaar cards to ration cards, or their biometric verification fails. “For some, it is the lack of an Aadhaar card link, for some others the biometric fails but ultimately, it is the elderly and the poorest that are facing exclusion. Many of those affected need the subsidised ration to simply put food on their table,” says Umesh, an activist who has led several struggles against denial of essential services due to lack of an Aadhaar link.

“You have to identify yourself by fingerprint recognition or you don’t get ration. PDS sellers are bound to maintain exemption lists for the elderly and for those who have not linked their Aadhaar cards to ration cards but on the ground, it has always been ‘No Aadhaar, no ration’,” he adds.

Data released by the Food and Civil Services Department of the Karnataka government too revealed that the system is not functioning smoothly. Of the 1.2 crore ration cards linked with the biometrics database in Karnataka, nearly 99 lakh cards recorded transactions in February 2018. Of these, fingerprint authentication did not work for over 18.6 lakh cards, almost one in five families in the state. 



The weighing machine at the PDS Shop in Bhoothanahalli has been left unused for weeks.
'Solving internet connectivity is the way to go'
Despite its problems, the Food Department is adamant about continuing the use of fingerprint authentication at all ration shops, except those in areas without any connectivity, as authorities believe that it has reduced pilferage of food grains and ‘saved costs’ for the state.

"It has encouraged transparency because now we can keep track of every PDS seller in the state. Before this, there were no state-wide records available," says says MC Gangadhar, Deputy Director of the Public Distribution System in Karnataka.
However, officials confirmed that Aadhaar is not mandatory for availing ration. “Aadhaar has not been made mandatory for availing ration. People can link it to their ration cards and then avail ration by identifying themselves through their fingerprint, but there is also an exemption category for those who have not linked their Aadhaar cards,” he added.

Even though the government mandates an ‘exemption’ list for people like Parvathi to avail ration without an Aadhaar card, activists in many parts of the state allege that PDS sellers in rural areas do not maintain exemption lists at all. Conversations with several PDS sellers across the state reaffirmed that the working principle remained ‘No Aadhaar, no ration’ on the ground.

The issue gained some attention when forty Dalit families in Chowdadenahalli in Chikballapur took the extreme step of spreading out mats and eating raw vegetables, protesting denial of ration for one-and-a-half years, for not linking their Aadhaar cards. They were compensated with all one-and-a-half years’ worth of ration when the issue came to the notice of officials at the Food and Civil Supplies Department in Bengaluru.


Residents of Chowdadenahalli in Chikballapur district protest against denial of ration due to lack of an Aadhaar link in January 2018.
Gangadhar however defended the system and said that incidents like the one in Chowdadenhahalli were a ‘one-off’. "What we should be doing is solving the internet connectivity issues in rural areas," he said.

The Karnataka government appears to be in favour of continuing its drive to administer ration via Aadhaar based biometric authentication. In February 2017, it passed a bill titled ‘The Karnataka Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill 2018’ making “proof of Aadhaar number necessary for receipt of certain subsidies, benefits and services”. The bill was passed by voice vote and gained support from both Congress and BJP in the state, even though the Centre had retracted its earlier order and instructed state governments in October 2017 to not deny ration to those who do not have an Aadhaar card or have not linked their ration cards to Aadhaar.

In repeated orders since 2013, the Supreme Court too has stressed that an Aadhaar card link cannot be made compulsory to avail government welfare benefits. The Aadhaar Act, specifically section 7, which allows the use of Aadhaar to deliver government services does not specify that it is a mandatory requirement.

The Right to Food campaign, a network of individuals and organisations working to implement the right to food in the country, has filed 300 affidavits and over 1000 petitions from Karnataka in the Supreme Court, highlighting the struggles of residents in availing essential services. The Supreme Court is currently hearing a case that challenges the constitutional validity of Aadhaar. The verdict in the case will affect all other Aadhaar related cases in courts across the country including the one being fought by Heggappa.  



Residents of Neeladanahalli huddled in a discussion. Hegappa (seated centre) is leading the villagers' struggle for ration in the Chikkamagaluru district court
'Only widespread protests will help bring change'
The fine-print of the rules however has never affected the situation on the ground in Bhoothanahalli and several other villages in the state, as residents have had to toil for their monthly ration ever since the biometric based authentication system was put in place in early 2017. 
Activists say that a lack of awareness among residents in rural areas about their individual rights, and apathy of civic officials and PDS sellers, has contributed to the systemic problem denying ration to citizens. "Only widespread protests in rural areas like the one in Chowdadenahalli can help bring about change, " says Umesh.  
Residents of Begur Gram panchayat to which Bhoothanahalli and Arabala belong, held a protest on January 12, 2018, over the issue of denial of ration and also sent a letter to the then Karnataka Food and Civil Supplies Minister UT Khader. Their pleas however fell on deaf ears and are now banking on the new government to change their stance on the issue and ensure that ration is given to every resident in the state as promised. 

Friday, May 25, 2018

13571 - These many people denied ration due to Aadhaar-related factors - Financial Express


Aadhaar-related exclusion is low in percentage terms but affects many in absolute numbers -- as many as 2 million in just three states of the country, a report has said.

By: Pragya Srivastava | Published: May 19, 2018 12:03 PM

In Rajasthan, 1.2% of all Public Distribution System (PDS) beneficiaries face exclusion due to Aadhaar authentication failures.

Aadhaar-related exclusion is low in percentage terms but affects many in absolute numbers — as many as 2 million in just three states of the country, a report has said. The 12-digit biometric ID, which aims for efficient, transparent and targeted delivery of subsidies, has led to exclusion of 2 million individuals from their PDS entitlements every month from the rural regions in Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan and West Bengal, a report by global research firm IDinsight said.

Biometric authentication failures are often cited as a reason for exclusion. In Rajasthan, 1.2% of all Public Distribution System (PDS) beneficiaries face exclusion due to Aadhaar authentication failures. The reported also noted that the incidence of biometric authentication failure is much higher as revealed by UIDAI’s own data. Using Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act 2016, central and state governments have asked beneficiaries of 252 schemes to authenticate themselves using Aadhaar.

Even as there are exclusions, Aadhaar verified PDS system is gaining popularity in rural areas of Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan. “About 55.3% Andhra and 67.4% Rajasthan PDS beneficiaries say that the new system of PDS delivery using Aadhaar is better than the previous one without Aadhaar,” the report said.

What’s worrying is that non-Aadhaar reasons for exclusion tend to be significantly higher in general than Aadhaar. The report also conducted a household survey, in which 97% people said that privacy is important to them. In August last year, when the Supreme Court ruled that privacy is a fundamental right, it opened doors for a slew of petitions challenging Aadhaar for infringement of privacy.

The respondents said in the survey said that it is important for them to know how their Aadhaar information is used by the government. Despite the privacy concern, 87% respondents approved mandatory linking of Aadhaar with various services. A total of 2,947 households were surveyed by IDinsight.


Earlier this year, a report by Chandigarh-based Tribune said that some of the Aadhaar details were up for sale for just Rs 500. Even as the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) rejected the claims of the data breach, a lot of questions were raised on data protection by government authorities and private players involved in it, including during Aadhaar hearing in the apex court.

Friday, April 20, 2018

13320 - Great Aadhar Game - Day After India




Through arbitrary subversion of legalities, government is turning us into random number generators. But, it would be interesting to know whether Benford’s Law applies here or not

By Asit Manohar

The Supreme Court’s interim order of March 13 appears incongruous to the earlier unanimous verdict on the right to privacy and is at odds with the constitutional right to equality. 

The deadline to link Aadhaar with bank accounts and phones have been indefinitely extended while they aren’t extended for any welfare schemes for the poor such as old age pensions and the rural job guarantee scheme, MNREGA.

This implies that Aadhaar will be voluntary for the rich while being mandatory to access critical survival measures for the poor. In other words, sadly, right to privacy seems to crucially hinge on the class position of a citizen. In essence, it reinstates the Orwellian cliche that some of us are more equal than others.

Be that as it may, this differential access to “freedom” implies that we can happily choose to file our taxes without Aadhaar. There is a small catch though. For some inexplicable and rather bizarre reason, nobody can file their returns electronically without an Aadhaar number.  The income tax returns website does not let you file your returns unless you furnish a 12-digit number. This seems to be in contravention of the March 13 interim order of the apex court. As such, even conscientious taxpayers, who do not have Aadhaar, are reportedly being forced to provide an arbitrary 12-digit number as a proxy for Aadhaar.

What does a diligent taxpayer who does not have an Aadhaar do in such a Catch 22 situation? Anecdotal evidence suggests that such taxpayers are trying out their hand at imagining a random Aadhaar number so that the system lets you submit your returns. The Centre, through arbitrary subversion of legalities, is turning us into random number generators. It is not the intention to suggest that anyone should do that, but it is in this context that it might be instructive learn about Benford’s law (also called First Digit Law). Perhaps it may help to learn how to imagine a “good” large random number?  Let’s get into some mathematical melodrama to learn one way to fake randomness in situations that deal with large numbers (12 digits, for example).

So, what is Benford’s law? Benford’s law states that in many real life situations when data is observed in high magnitude, more numbers begin with the digits 1, 2, or 3, as opposed to 7,8, or 9. For example, consider a 250-page book. There are about 109 pages whose page numbers begin with the digit 1 (pages 1,11-19,100-199), 60 pages beginning with the digit 2 while only 10 pages beginning with the digit 9. As another example — consider the number of people in various age groups. As a proportion of the population, chances are there are more people with ages that start with the digit 1 than with the digit 9. At first, Benford’s law appears to be counter-intuitive because if the distribution of the first digit in datasets are truly random, then each digit between 1 and 9 have the same chance, i.e., 1 out 9 (11.1%) of being the first digit, i.e., be uniformly spread.

However, the frequency distribution of beginning digits in many data settings indicates otherwise. In particular, this holds true for datasets that grow exponentially (doubles or triples) such as bacterial colony data, populations of cities, and not to forget income tax data. It is empirically observed that, on an average, the first digit is 1 in about 30% of the cases, it is 2 in about 17.5% of the cases, and it is 3 in about 12% of the cases. The systematic pattern of the first digit being further away from 1 continues and number 9 is the first digit in only about 5% of all the data points.

The fact is a consequence of digits in such datasets being non-uniformly spread on the original measured scale but uniformly distributed on a logarithmic scale – used to rescale exponentially growing data where the interest is more on the number of digits. Very simply, logarithms (log) tell us the number of digits after the first digit in a number. So log 10 = 1 and log 1000 = 3. It denotes the power to which a number is to be raised to get another number.

This phenomenon was first highlighted by the astronomer Simon Newcomb in 1881 when he observed that the initial pages of the logarithm tables were yellower and more smudged than the latter pages. This led him to conjecture that the logarithms of numbers beginning with the digit 1 were more prevalent than numbers beginning with higher digits. The same principle was later tested and verified across several datasets by the physicist, Frank Benford of GE Research in 1938. He tested the hypothesis by looking at surface areas of rivers, US population, numbers in Reader’s Digest magazine, street addresses of hundreds of people etc.

In the 1990s, researcher Mark Nigrini used Benford’s law to track accounting frauds by reviewing sales figures, insurance claims and reimbursement claims. For example, owing to a policy threshold of $100,000, a fraudster wrote several cheques to himself just below this threshold, i.e., with a first digit in the cheque amount being 9. This obvious departure from the expectation of 5% of numbers beginning with the digit 9 was a red signal to catch accounting fraud. Benford’s law has been similarly used to look at fudged numbers in income tax returns and is permissible as evidence for criminal cases in the US.
However, Benford’s law does not apply to data that that have been assigned. Consequently, this law will not apply to the oft-compared twin (quite incorrectly so) of Aadhaar-Social Security Numbers (SSN) in the US. The 9-digit SSN are not randomly generated but have a well-defined structure of assignation.
The questions for us is – given that Aadhaar is a 11-digit random number (the 12 is technically not), will Aadhaar numbers also follow Benford’s law? In case it does, then just to follow the Supreme Court order, and be a diligent citizen, should innocent people without Aadhaar have had to learn all this jugglery just to be “random”?

Recently, the central government/UIDAI’s lawyer claimed in the Supreme Court that Aadhaar data centres are kept protected inside walls that are “13 feet tall and 5 feet thick”. Given such strong and exemplary data security and data protection features, would one wish to be caught just because one sprinkled equal number of ones and nines to create a make-believe 12 digit number? Isn’t it absurd that we have to fake to establish honesty? Till the crimes of the state’s arbitrariness are brought to proper punishment, the so-called misdemeanour of randomness may continue.


Monday, April 16, 2018

13295 - People protest after denial of ration over Aadhaar seeding - TNN


Nisha Nambiar | TNN | Updated: Apr 15, 2018, 10:51 IST

Nirmala Rajput, a daily wager, from Guruwar Peth has also been denied her mandatory ration by a fair price shopowner in her area for over a month now due to the problem with the authentication of her fingerprint. 

PUNE: Navabai Ansari, a maid from Mangalwar Peth, is a harassed woman. It has been over two months now, but the fair price shopowner in her area won’t give her food grains as her husband’s Aadhaar and the ration card are not linked. 

Ansari and Rajput are among hordes of other citizens who have been made to run from pillar to post to get their Aadhaar updated or linked to ration card, but to no avail. For them, skipping a day’s work means reduced income, thus, lesser money to take care of their families. 

For instance, Ansari has a family of six. “Till the documents are linked, how am I supposed to feed them,” she said, while expressing her helplessness in the entire ordeal. 

As the complaint to the public distribution office failed to yield any result, these women have resorted to protest against the government’s inhumane approach. They want the names of Public Distribution System (PDS) beneficiaries should be displayed outside every fair price shop and no beneficiary should be denied the ration due to Aadhaar. 

These people are appalled that they have been denied their ration in the home turf of guardian minister Girish Bapat, who is also the food and civil supplies minister. 

The new system where ration card holders are given PDS supplies through point of sale machines linked to their Aadhaar card has come under sharp criticism. “The death of Santoshi Kumari, an 11-year-old girl from Karimati village in Jharkhand, is really heartbreaking. The girl died due to starvation after her family’s ration card was cancelled due to non-linkage with Aadhaar card,” vice-president of Janwadi Mahila Sanghatana Kiran Moghe, who is leading the protest, said. 

Moghe said the new Aadhaar-linked PoS machines at fair price shops has resulted in chaos. “We just want that PDS beneficiaries should not be denied ration at any cost and if the authentication has to be made mandatory, the government should find better ways to go about it,” she added.

The protesters said the beneficiaries without gas connections have been forced to buy kerosene from the black market at Rs 80/litre. At the fair price shop, it costs nothing more than Rs 20. 

Moghe says many workers are unable to get Aadhaar cards because their fingerprints are not recorded due to the poor condition of their hands. “Due to this, they are unable to authenticate their Aadhaar cards, leading to denial of food grains and are forced to take tokens and stand in long queues at the zonal offices, leading to loss of pay,” she added.

Another activists Hirabai Ghonge said, “We will be giving a consolidated list of all those deprived of daily ration to the FDO and ensure that their ration supply is started immediately. We would ensure that there is public reading of all the names in the list. We would continue our protests if any one is deprived of ration.”


Thursday, April 5, 2018

13180 - Rising prices of grains, digitisation of PDS records pose challenges for the poor to avail food

India Rashme Sehgal Apr 02, 2018 21:30:15 IST

The last few years have seen a growing price difference between the market price of grain and PDS rations. The prices of rice, wheat and pulses have been rising steadily making it more difficult for the poor to buy grain at market price. It is for this reason that the ration card provides a lifeline to millions of Indians who are leading increasingly fragile and uncertain lives. It helps them ensure they can get wheat at the subsidised rate of Rs two per kilo and rice at Rs three per kilo whereas the market price of these commodities can be twenty times these prices.

Balakram Agriya, a pleasant looking, pony-tailed Adivasi from Chhattisgarh is one of the thousands who epitomise this uncertainty. While trying to fathom why he had been denied a ration card, he said, "I have got an Aadhaar card made. I have also been given money to build a house under the Indira Gandhi Awas Yojana (IGAY). If I can qualify for the IGAY, then why am I being denied a ration card? I am poor enough to receive funds from the Awas Yojana (scheme) but not poor enough for a ration card ?" he remarked.

Indeed Balakram admits to being an extremely confused person. "I own one acre of land. Unfortunately, it is a dry land. It has no water so I cannot grow anything on it. I have three kids – main roz hi kamata hun aur roz hi khata hun (I earn and eat on a daily basis). Given that I am in the BPL category, I am (according to government rules) entitled to 35 kilos of grain under the Antodaya Yojana. One is supposed to get that grain even if one does not possess a ration card but no one is following this rule.’’

Sharda ben from Gujarat finds herself in the same situation as Balakram. A Dalit, her name was included in the IGAY and the government built her house following the earthquake in Bhuj. And yet she says, "Despite all these years of struggle, I have not been able to get a ration card made". Sharda ben’s other complaint is that despite the quake-affected being given houses, the government has given her the land pattas. "I have applied for a patta but have not got one yet," she said.

Balakram and Sharda Ben are among many people who came from fourteen states to the capital to give testimony earlier this month about the problems they faced tackling issues of hunger and unemployment at a public hearing organised by the Right to Food campaign in the capital. These testimonies were heard by legislators, scholars and lawyers.

Middle-aged Pratap Singh from Zilla Satna in Madhya Pradesh spoke out about how despite his best efforts to be included in the public distribution system under the National Food Security Act, he had not met with success. "I am a member of the Gonda tribe. I am in the SC category."Although the district administration gave me repeated assurances, they have failed to give me a ration card."

Pratap Singh also owns one acre of land but the land is not irrigated and is dependent on rainfall to grow crops."I have two children. Both my children had institutional deliveries but we have not received a single paisa due to us under the Janani Suraksha Yojana. I have completed all the documentation. I have an Aadhaar card and yet no money has been given to us," said Singh.

One of the most harrowing testimonies was given by Vishwanath of Jharkhand who recalled the circumstances that lead to death due to hunger of a poor tribal woman, Budhi Soren, in Giridih in January this year.

"There have been seven deaths from starvation in our area. There was no food for days on end in the homes of these poor tribals. I myself was witness to how there was no food in Budhni’s house for fifteen days at a stretch. She lived in a phus ka ghar (straw hut) and would go into the forests to pluck the leaves of the mahua tree to make pattals from them. The district administration has tried to pass off their deaths as being the result of an illness, but all of us who were her neighbours know the reality," said Vishwanath.

The starvation death of 36-year-old Amir Jahan from Moradabad in Uttar Pradesh has also followed the same tragic trajectory. Amir Jahan’s husband pointed out that, "I am a rickshaw puller by profession and did not know how to go about applying for a ration card. I have three daughters and little money to feed them."

Having contracted TB and lacking enough strength to work as a rickshaw puller, he decided to migrate to Pune in search of work. The medication, he maintained, left him weak, so he discontinued the treatment. "During my wife's last three days, we had no food in the house and she did not eat a grain of food," he disclosed with a sense of utter helplessness and despair.

The statistics shared by Debashis, a sarpanch from Koraput in Odisha, were also not encouraging. Debashis said, "From the 1393 households in my gram panchayat, 175 do not have a ration card. We applied for them one year ago and we are still waiting. The website that gives us the status of our positions has been closed down and despite our repeated requests nothing is happening on the ground."

The cancellation of existing ration cards in the absence of Aadhaar cards has allegedly resulted in hunger deaths in Karnataka. Taramani Sahu from Simdega recounted the hunger death of Santoshi due to the cancellation of her family’s ration card in the absence of Aadhaar seeding. The situation is also very grave in Karnataka where three brothers died in Gokarna in Karnataka due to starvation following the discontinuation of their ration cards.

It is not as though this situation is confined to rural areas. Several homeless persons from Delhi have testified about how they have been denied several entitlements due to the absence of identification documents. Others testified on how they had been denied social security pension despite suffering from the disability.

Elderly and ailing Ranjeet Kaur has travelled from Amritsar to give testimony. She claims she had battled "the system" for several years in order to get her pension to little avail. "Despite my inability to walk properly, I had made frequent visits to the office of the District Collector to inform the officials that I am not receiving my pension and yet, nothing has come out of these efforts."

The story of Gulshan Khatoun from Noida is equally heart rending. She said, "I have three sons. All three boys are disabled. Despite my constant attempts, I have failed to get a widow pension or a disability pension nor do I have a ration card." She makes ends meet through one of her son's occasional work.

Food Minister Ram Vilas Paswan has claimed that the push to digitise the database of beneficiaries by authenticating their identities via Aadhaar has helped the government scrap over 23 million fake ration cards and also helped the government save Rs 14,000 crore. “This money will be used to provide foodgrain to more needy households,” Paswan said at a press meet.
The finance secretary Ashok Lavasa went a step further and said that the Direct Benefit Transfer scheme using Aadhaar technology had helped the government save Rs 34,000 crore. However, food activist Nikhil Dey along with Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan and other activists have questioned the claim that four crore bogus ration cards have been eliminated pointing out there is no official data to back this.

Also, Paswan’s assertion that the money saved will be used to provide food grain to the more needy households flies in the face of the increasing number of hunger deaths. Lakhs of people from marginalised communities still do not have Aadhaar cards. There are equally large numbers without ration cards. These people have no voice and so their complaints go unheard.
Dey, an activist, at a press interaction to present on-ground findings about the impact of Aadhaar on welfare schemes and especially the PDS in Rajasthan, had pointed out that as of July 2017, 33 percent of the holders of ration cards, which have been seeded with Aadhaar, were unable to procure their rations from the PDS outlets, because of repeated problems in biometric authentication of fingerprints, and internet connectivity issues in the Point of Sale machines," Dey pointed out.

Food activist Koninika Ray also cited the example of how ten lakh people had been declared dead and therefore ineligible for pensions. Aruna Roy heading the MKNS in Rajasthan said she brought several of these 'dead’ villagers to Delhi to show that they were alive.

Roy also expressed disappointed at the Supreme Court order of 13 March which had extended the deadline for Aadhaar linking of facilities such as bank accounts and SIM cards, but had permitted the continued imposition of Aadhaar on social services and entitlements such as the PDS, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) and social security pensions.

She believed the order “perpetuated a long-standing double standard, whereby the hardships experienced by privileged classes due to Aadhaar being made mandatory are being addressed while much greater hardships endured by poor people are ignored.”


Published Date: Apr 02, 2018 21:30 PM |

Thursday, March 29, 2018

13142 - More time to include ration card holders in Aadhaar net - TNN


Nisha Nambiar | TNN | Updated: Mar 29, 2018, 09:29 IST

PUNE: The Centre’s announcement to extend linking of Aadhaar cards with various welfare schemes by three more months will help the administration complete the process of covering ration card beneficiaries. 

At present, only 70% ration card beneficiaries in the district are linked with Aadhaar. The government on Wednesday extended by three months to June 30 the deadline for linking of Aadhaar with welfare schemes, where the benefits are funded from the Consolidated Fund of India. 

Pune food and distribution department officials said the extension will help then cover the excluded population yet to link their ration cards with Aadhaar cards. Even as the earlier deadline was March 31, an official said they would not refuse to disburse foodgrain to the beneficiarues following an undertaiking that they would link their ration cards with Aadhaar.

“The extension is a bonus for the citizens, who will have time till June to carry out the linking process,” the official said. 

LATEST COMMENT
gone case adhar
anonymous

The officials said they would ensure cent-per-cent linking of the two cards in the next three months in the rural areas. “Our officers will visit the fair price shops and direct their owners to reach out to the beneficiaries and ensure that there cards were linked at the earliest,” an official said.

The beneficiaries are also happy with the extension. Lakhan Das, a watchman by profession, said he has both the cards but were yet to link them as he was away to his hometown in Bihar for three months. “I returned on Tuesday and there was a huge rush at the fair price shop in Kondwa for the linking process. We will have some more time for the linking work following the extension,” he said.




Sunday, March 25, 2018

13089 - Video: Are the Aadhaar-linked welfare schemes leaving India’s poor hungry? - Scroll.In




Testimonies from people who have been denied several entitlements due to the mandatory integration of welfare schemes like PDS with Aadhaar.

Published Yesterday · 06:12 pm



Producer: Shibika Suresh | Video Editors: Sanjeev Nair and Makrand Sanghvi

Support our journalism by paying for Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.

Thursday, December 14, 2017

12498 - Is the Aadhaar experiment akin to an elephant walking a tightrope? - Your Story

While criticism against Aadhaar has been quick, there is a need for an unbiased report on the ways in which the PDS system has fared since its implementation.

There are numerous examples where Aadhaar glitches have spelled trouble, misery and major inconvenience to the citizens of India. A widow from Jharkhand who cannot walk has been denied food grains from January 2017 because she couldn’t authenticate herself. A family had two members whose fingerprints couldn’t  match with the database of Aadhaar, and authorities refused to provide food grains.

Such instances have become common talking points in the discourse of Aadhaar implementation. Other topics related to Aadhaar that have ruled the discourse heavily is that of privacy of public data that has been acquired by UIDAI through Aadhaar implementation. Through our social dialogue it becomes clear that there are two tests that Aadhaar project should essentially pass to win support from the public:

1.  The Privacy test
2. The Welfare test

The Aadhaar experiment is is enormous and historic. I call this an experiment because the whole action of creating a social identity to serve the purpose of inclusive banking and many other purposes is something new. India as a nation currently is testing many hypotheses. The primary purpose of Aadhaar is to serve as the universal identity, iron out kinks while availing subsidies, and also act as an enabler to acquire other government authorised documents like passport etc.

As of August 2017, 1.17 billion people in India are enrolled members of Aadhaar. While enrolling in Aadhaar the system collects a photo, scans of 10 fingers and an iris scan of the eyes. Put together with the name, address and phone number, Aadhaar transforms into a total digital identity for an Indian. It is one of the most sophisticated ID projects in the world. The successive UPA and NDA governments were able to build a platform that was able to onboard more than one billion people. No other public entity has been able to carry out this feat.
Let’s briefly go over where exactly Aadhaar has served us in the near past. Aadhaar card was used as the major document of proof when opening a bank account under the Pradhan Mantri Jhan Dhan Yojana. The account opened under this scheme has major benefits of zero account balance, accident benefits, RuPay card etc. Aadhaar was used to directly transfer subsidies to one’s bank account when someone is eligible for the same. Introduction of Aadhaar has also been a boon to the banking industry, as it provides great relief to citizens whilst opening a bank account by asking them to submit only one document.
The other advantages of a unique ID are also for everyone to see. There are so many government initiatives that have bitten dust just because they could not target beneficiaries precisely. Aadhaar helps this condition through:
  1. Unique identification and authentication of targeted beneficiaries,
  2. Removal of ghost beneficiaries,
  3. Identification of tax evaders.
There are and there will be some problems when such progressive changes are made. The way the public distribution system (PDS) has worked in India through its inception and till the near present is no secret.  The whole system is still a leaky pipe. There is no denying the crucial failures in Aadhaar that have led to some problems at the ground level. But to look at the Aadhaar issue in the case of welfare distribution one ought to look at its performance vis a vis the old system.
The relevant question to be asked amidst all this disruption is if the Aadhaar-targeted PDS machinery better than ration card-targeted PDS machinery.
The old PDS also had a large number of poor and needy people going without food. Fair price shop owners used to fake ration cards and sell ration in the open market.  Research should be aimed at comparative analysis and if and how the new system has brought any desirable changes. What has been clearly missing is a clear and transparent investigation of Aadhaar-based PDS. An expert committee should be set up to evaluate and take report of the ground situation. It is really noteworthy that despite such criticisms no organisation has come up with a deep fact-based analysis of the situation. One-off cases and outliers, although very sad and unfortunate, do not at all make case for removal of Aadhaar-based PDS.
From a technological and design perspective, the cases that have come up are clearly avoidable under the present structure of Aadhaar-based PDS. Better on-ground management from bureaucrats and civil servants, technical finetuning of Aadhaar infrastructure such as offline verification system and other improvements could have easily prevented many of the cases.
It is easy to get paranoid only when big changes are made to the present-day system.
The debate on privacy is more natural and is a consequence of the big shadow that a great elephant-esque project like Aadhaar throws. A database of more than one billion humans that contains names, addresses, biometric identity and identification will without doubt be a target of digital mining. No database is perfectly secure and there have been many reports of privacy breach resulting from government carelessness and hacking efforts from engineers. There have been fears that Aadhaar data may be used for surveillance or to punish dissenters.
But at the same time in a country like India, where only a little more than four percent of the population pays any kind of direct tax, we need Aadhaar to spread a wider web to increase tax collection and, in effect, have a larger pocket to spend on social welfare schemes. What do we prioritise: individual privacy or efficient social welfare scheme implementations?  Those are two difficult things to do a trade off with.
For the Aadhaar project to gain widespread trust there has to be incredible technical and social innovation, where a great digital trust system that is well designed addresses privacy and efficiency concerns. From the lens of 2017, it just seems like an elephant trying to balance a rope. A thin one.

(Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of YourStory.)



Tuesday, November 21, 2017

12407 - Centre: Till December 31, PDS rations cannot be denied even if Aadhaar number not linked - United News of India


New Delhi, Nov 19 (UNI) With reports of Public Distribution System (PDS) beneficiaries being denied subsidised rations for want of Aadhaar number or failure of biometric authentication, the Central government on Saturday clarified that eligible beneficiaries can have their Aadhaar numbers linked to ration cards/smart cards till December 31. They should not be denied foodgrains on this count.

'The Centre is aware of the challenges in the transition to the Point of Sale (PoS)-based Aadhaar authentication system in the PDS. It has, therefore, issued instructions to ensure that while Aadhaar-based authentication needs to be promoted, no eligible beneficiary under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) should be deprived of the entitled quantity of foodgrains for want of Aadhaar number or failure of biometric authentication,' a Food Ministry press note said here.

The Ministry was reacting to recent reports of an alleged starvation death of a woman in Bareilly district on the heels of the death of an 11-year-old girl in Simdega district in Jharkhand last month.

'Any member of the eligible household will be entitled to receive entire quantity of subsidised foodgrain or cash transfer of food subsidy under NFSA on behalf of the household if he/she fulfills identification requirements, irrespective of whether all members of the household have had Aadhaar number assigned to them,' the ministry note said.

It has also been clarified that in case of failure of biometric authentication due to network/connectivity/ linking issue or due to poor biometric of the beneficiary or any other technical reason, the beneficiary is to be provided subsidised foodgrain or cash transfer of Food Subsidy on the basis of physical production of Aadhaar card along with the ration card by him/her in place of biometric authentication, as provided in the Aadhaar Act.

The seeding of Aadhaar number is aimed at biometric identification of the beneficiaries for the targeting of the foodgrains provided under NFSA and weeding out bogus ration cards.

UNI GP SV 1109


Read more at http://www.uniindia.com/centre-till-december-31-pds-rations-cannot-be-denied-even-if-aadhaar-number-not-linked/india/news/1051486.html#s7UFjHCAvUHR8HwH.99

Sunday, November 5, 2017

12273 - Puzzle of 'foolproof' PDS - Telegraph India


Animesh Bisoee


Budhni Gope, a Lodhasholi villager, shows her ration card. (Animesh Sengupta)

Jamshedpur: The state food minister acknowledged that some 4,000 ration card holders at East Singhbhum's Lodhasholi panchayat, some 100km from here, had not got ration since June due to grain theft at source, but his department's secretary can't explain how.

Most of the beneficiaries of public distribution system at this panchayat have got their ration cards linked to Aadhaar, which is the state's thrust for weeding out fake beneficiaries and making ration delivery transparent.

Still, as food minister Saryu Roy told this paper, the PDS dealer (Rohit Kumar Gope) and food mafia stole the grain, depriving people of 10 revenue villages their ration.

Asked how theft was possible at a mass scale at the stockist's when the state was so concerned about weeding out individual fake beneficiaries, food and civil supplies secretary Vinay Kumar Choubey claimed their online monitoring system was "foolproof".

Told that Lodhasholi was not getting ration since June despite the foolproof system, Choubey said he couldn't say anything offhand.

"In our state over 90 per cent ration cards have been linked to Aadhaar so that we can monitor ration distribution," he said. "It is tough to say how so many villagers are denied ration for so long despite Aadhaar linkage. It can happen if a beneficiary is denied ration even after getting biometric authentication done at the dealer but stays silent."

Told beneficiaries were not staying silent, he said, "I will ask for a probe."

JMM MLA of Baharagora Kunal Sarangi, under whom this panchayat falls, slammed the PDS delivery. "If something like this can happen at East Singhbhum, from where chief minister Raghubar Das hails, imagine what goes on in remote districts. I want an FIR against the PDS dealer," he said.

Told that Lodhasholi was not getting ration since June despite the foolproof system, Choubey said he couldn't say anything offhand.

"In our state over 90 per cent ration cards have been linked to Aadhaar so that we can monitor ration distribution," he said. "It is tough to say how so many villagers are denied ration for so long despite Aadhaar linkage. It can happen if a beneficiary is denied ration even after getting biometric authentication done at the dealer but stays silent."

Told beneficiaries were not staying silent, he said, "I will ask for a probe."

JMM MLA of Baharagora Kunal Sarangi, under whom this panchayat falls, slammed the PDS delivery. "If something like this can happen at East Singhbhum, from where chief minister Raghubar Das hails, imagine what goes on in remote districts. I want an FIR against the PDS dealer," he said.

12251 - Don’t deny PDS foodgrains to non-Aadhaar beneficiaries, Centre tells States - The Hindu


PTI
NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 26, 2017 16:00 IST

Fingerprint of a customer is verified at a PDS shop in Hyderabad. File   | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The directive follows the death of a 11-year-old Jharkhand girl, allegedly due to starvation after being allegedly denied PDS ration.
The Union government has instructed the States not to deny the public distribution system (PDS) benefits to any one who does not have Aadhaar or has not linked his ration card to the number and warned of strict action on violation of the directive.
The Centre also asked the State governments not to delete eligible households from the list of beneficiaries for non-possession of Aadhaar.
An instruction in this regard was issued this week to all the States, after a 11-year-old Jharkhand girl recently died of alleged starvation after being allegedly denied PDS ration.
Activists' charge
Activists have alleged that the girl in Simdega district died of starvation as her family’s ration card was cancelled since it was not linked to Aadhaar.
In the directive, the food Ministry has clarified that deletion from the ration card database can only happen after a proper verification establishes “beyond reasonable doubt” that an entry pertaining to the cardholder is not genuine.
State field functionaries have been asked to ensure that beneficiaries are not turned away on the ground of non-possession of Aadhaar, and all exceptions in this regard are recorded in a separate logbook.
When contacted, Ajay Bhushan Pandey, CEO of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), told PTI, “The intention is to ensure that no one is denied any food benefits for lack of Aadhaar, lack of linking, or technical difficulty in biometric authentication. As long as a person is genuine, he has to be given the benefit, in this case, ration.”
ALSO READ


The States and the Union Territories will have to make arrangements to provide Aadhaar enrolment facilities to those without Aadhaar and link their Aadhaar numbers with their ration cards, the Ministry said. It cautioned that strict action would be taken if provisions of the notification are violated.
As per the National Food Security Act, the States have been given deadline till December 2017 to link Aadhaar with ration cards. So far, 82% of the ration cards have been seeded with Aadhaar number in the country.
The Ministry directive mentions that till such time Aadhaar is assigned to the beneficiary, subsidised foodgrains will have be given on production of ration card, enrolment slip and other stipulated documents like election card.
Irrespective of whether all members of an eligible household have Aadhaar, full quantity of subsidised foodgrains or cash transfer of food subsidy upon fulfilling the requirements laid down will have to be extended.
Similarly, even in the case of failure of biometric authentication due to a technical glitch or poor biometric quality, the beneficiary will have to be provided the benefits on physical production of Aadhaar card along with the ration card.
All these cases — namely those without Aadhaar, Aadhaar not linked to ration card, or failure of biometric authentication — where benefits are being extended, will have to be recorded separately as “exceptions” by the fair price shop dealer.

Further, the States will have to devise a mechanism of monthly audit and inspection, including field verification of such “exceptions” to guard against any “misuse”.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

12100 - Some ID, if not Aadhaar, needed for subsidised foodgrains: HC - Money Control

Sep 19, 2017 10:14 PM IST | Source: PTI

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar said that distribution of foodgrains without any identity proof will lead to people coming to Delhi from all over the country which would strain the resources of the city.


The Delhi High Court on Tuesday said that Delhi'ites seeking to avail subsidised foodgrains under the public distribution system (PDS) should have some sort of identification if they do not have Aadhaar cards.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar said that distribution of foodgrains without any identity proof will lead to people coming to Delhi from all over the country which would strain the resources of the city.
"Imagine the whole of India converging on the metropolis. Where will the housing, water and sanitation come from," it asked an NGO which has sought disbursal of subsidised foodgrains to the beneficiaries under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) without Aadhaar cards?
"Without any identification, everyone from all over will come here. Bring some ID. Even as per you, more (beneficiaries) have surfaced," it said.




The bench also refused to grant the NGO's interim plea for a stay on the rollout of the Aadhaar-linked point of sale (POS) machines at fair price shops for distribution of foodgrains and listed the matter for further hearing on November 7.
The Delhi government, represented by advocate Anuj Aggarwal, submitted a status report before the bench highlighting the benefits of rolling out the POS machines.
The status report said that POS machines would ensure authentification of beneficiaries, eradication of bogus ration cards, check on diversion and pilferage of subsidised foodgrains, enabling of digital payments as well as easier verification of stock at fair price shops.
The NGO, Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan, had moved the court claiming that some slum dwellers in south Delhi were facing difficulties in getting subsidised foodgrains under the PDS due to lack of Aadhaar cards.
Under the NFSA which was rolled out across the country in November last year, five kgs of foodgrains per person is provided each month at Rs 1-3 per kg to over 80 crore people.
The Centre had earlier told the court that Aadhaar was made mandatory to ensure that the poor get subsidised foodgrains under the PDS.
Terming PDS as a "misused system", it had said that through Aadhaar, the endeavour was to ensure that the real beneficiaries get foodgrains.
Aadhaar is a 12-digit unique identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) after collecting biometric data of the citizens.
The PIL has sought to quash of the Centre's February 8 notification making Aadhaar mandatory for availing benefits under the NFSA. The notification came into effect on February 8 in all states and UTs, except Assam, Meghalaya and Jammu and Kashmir.

The petition has said the notification violates the basic principle of law enshrined in Articles 14 (equality) and 21 (right to life) of the Constitution.

Monday, September 11, 2017

12009 - Evaluating direct cash transfers Part-I: Problems are for real but most beneficiaries prefer new system to old PDS - First Post

Sep, 07 2017 15:21:26 IST

Two years after the Narendra Modi government took an ambitious step in subsidy reform – pilot programmes to test out cash transfers in lieu of subsidised food grains from ration shops – an evaluation report shows that it faces significant implementation problems, improvements notwithstanding. 

Around 20 percent of beneficiaries report not receiving the cash they are entitled to, even as they can no longer get cheap food from ration shops.

The report also shows that it costs beneficiaries more time and money to travel to banks to withdraw money and to markets to buy wheat and rice. Also, grievance redressal mechanisms are inadequate.

Before the opponents of cash transfers rejoice at being vindicated, they should mull on this: 65 percent of beneficiaries still prefer cash transfer to in-kind benefits, up from 39 percent a year earlier.

The point being made is this: Despite the pain of slapdash implementation, people tend to prefer cash transfers, over in-kind transfers. And, so long as implementation is improved, this preference is likely to increase over time.

On 1 September 2015, the government kicked off a pilot programme in Chandigarh and Puducherry -- ration card holders would stop getting subsidised wheat and rice from fair price shops; instead they would get cash with which they could buy these from the market. The cash would be transferred directly into the bank accounts of the woman of the household. In January 2016, the programme was started in Dadra and Nagar Haveli.

The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) South Asia was signed on to conduct a process monitoring study. The objective was to identify implementation gaps and provide feedback that could help decisions on scaling up the pilots. The study consisted of three rounds of surveys, conducted between January 2016 and March 2017, covering over 1,000 beneficiary households in each Union Territory.

The report of this study, which has been submitted to the government (read here), says that implementation quality “has improved over time but continues to remain a non-trivial challenge”.

First, the problems.

One, people not getting payments. In the first round conducted in March 2016, the survey found that only 47 percent of beneficiaries reported they had received cash. But this was based only on what the beneficiaries said. In the subsequent rounds, the surveyors verified their passbooks. At the end of the third round (October 2016 to January 2017), the percentage of those getting money increased to 78 percent. In Chandigarh, the percentage of those getting cash went up only marginally – from 73 percent to 78 percent. In Pondicherry, the improvement was significant – from 56 percent to 74 percent.
Of the 17 percent who were not getting cash in the first round, 53 percent had started getting it at the end of round three. However, 5 percent of those who were getting it at the start of the monitoring had stopped getting it later. Eleven percent of the beneficiaries said they received different amounts each month and 10 percent said they did not get payments every month on time.

But all this does not change the fact of nearly 20 percent beneficiaries reporting not getting money. This is not acceptable. When people do not get either subsidised food grains or cash to buy it with, even if it is just 1 percent failure, it is cruel.

Interestingly, in government records, only 1 percent of the payment transactions had failed. The report rules out chances of diversion, but points out that this may be because the money may be going into bank accounts that beneficiaries do not access or check.

This is a problem this writer also encountered while reporting on the pilot in Chandigarh and Pondicherry in 2016. The problem arises because the National Payment Corporation of India systems link the latest bank account seeded with Aadhaar to DBT payments. So people check the bank account which was initially receiving the cash and find the money has not been transmitted. Peeyush Kumar, joint secretary in the DBT Mission, admitted that little could be done to resolve this problem because of the design of the NPCI architecture, apart from ensuring that beneficiaries are informed about the change. The other option, he said, would be to shift to the Aadhaar Enabled Payment System, in which all bank accounts would be seeded with Aadhaar.

Two, beneficiaries were not being kept informed about transfers. Standard operating procedures of DBT required beneficiaries to be informed through SMS. However, in round three, though 65 percent of the beneficiaries said they had linked their mobile numbers with the scheme database, only 16 percent remembered getting an SMS in the previous month. Besides, 86 percent of the beneficiaries said the SMS was in English, when the SOP required it to be in the local language.
A related – and important – finding is that grievance redressal mechanisms are inadequate. At the end of round two, 25 percent beneficiaries had grievances with the system; this went up to 38 percent at the end of round three. Enquiries found that people did not know how to report their grievances. There were toll-free numbers but, at the end of round three, only one beneficiary in Chandigarh and two in Pondicherry had reported using it. No one in Dadra and Nagar Haveli had. This is not surprising. Toll-free helplines daunt even well-educated people; the recipients of cash transfers are from poor backgrounds with little education.

Three, beneficiaries found it takes more time to go to the bank and access the money than it used to take to go to the ration shop and get their fortnightly supplies. Using an ATM reduced the time to access money by 31 minutes. It also reduced the total time to take cash and buy grains from the market relative to the old public distribution system (PDS). However, 63 percent of beneficiaries do not have an ATM card for the bank where the money is being transmitted. The opportunity costs of accessing money through banks were also higher.

Four, beneficiaries also felt the money was inadequate by around 20 percent. In terms of money, it was found that beneficiaries calculated they needed Rs 889 per household more per month. The cash payout is calculated as 1.25 times the minimum support price minus the subsidised price paid at ration shops. The amount per person per month (under the National Food Security Act, the entitlement is for 5 kg per person in a household per month) varies in the three Union Territories because the cereal mix is different. However, prices for wheat and rice in the open market are higher because – and this is important – the quality is better.

So why not junk the cash transfer programme and return to the old PDS? The survey shows that despite all the problems, people may not want that. In the initial rounds, only 39 percent of the beneficiaries said they preferred cash transfers; by the third round this had gone up to 65 percent. Pondicherry reported the highest shift – from 32 percent to 77 percent.

Why would they do prefer a system where payments are erratic, the money isn’t sufficient and there’s no one to listen to their problems? The report says those who preferred DBT did so because they found it offered flexibility as well as convenience and choice in terms of quality of food – they could now buy better quality grains than what they got through the PDS or could spend on other food. “Over 95 percent of the beneficiaries report using cash to buy staple food grains and towards dietary diversity,” the report says, junking the myth that people will blow the money up on sin goods. Those who wanted to continue with the PDS did so because of the consistency in the monthly quantities, easier access and lesser out of pocket expenses on food.

The response varied depending on the experience with DBT and the older PDS. Those unhappy with the older system, who found the cash pay-out amount adequate and got it regularly preferred the new system to the old.

What does this mean for the future of the cash transfer pilots and for DBT in general? That will be dealt with in Part-II tomorrow.


Published Date: Sep 06, 2017 12:44 pm | Updated Date: Sep 07, 2017 03:21 pm


12006 - Removing dead from Public Distribution System list proves herculean task - Indian Express

By Samuel Merigala  |  Express News Service  |   Published: 05th September 2017 07:36 AM  |  

CHENNAI:  When M Devaki received an SMS from VM-TNEPDS that her husband had procured a packet of oil and a kilo of sugar from the ration shop on August 26, she was shocked. For her husband, P Madurai, had passed away six months ago. Living with her daughter’s family now, Devaki hadn’t used her husband’s smart card which was linked to his Aadhaar. On going through her SMS inbox, she noticed there were similar messages in the previous months too after his death. Someone had been procuring her dead husband’s ration. This is not uncommon, admitted officials.

Knowing that the dead do not require monthly provisions, salesmen at Public Distribution System (PDS) shops pilfer the ration. “Removing names of the dead from the system is a problem in the city. We still have to conduct manual checks for this purpose,” says S Madhumathi, commissioner of Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department.“Every three months, we refresh the system after sending personnel for visits to  PDS shops and homes in the the respective localities, but it is a herculean task,” she said.

It is relatively easier in the districts, as officials coordinate with the district Collector, who in turn delegates the work to the District Revenue Officer and his team. This team collects the details of the deceased from the village administrative officers. Chennai, with 17 PDS zones, makes it hard for officials to follow such a procedure. “Each month, we are able to conduct manual checks in just one shop from each of these 17 zones,” said an official.

“However, with the advent of smart ration cards linked to mobilephones and the TNEPDS app, people can request cancellation of deceased. With an OTP sent to the registered mobile number, they can complete the cancellation and help update the system,” he said. Of the 1,97,26,588 ration cards, 1,88,65,664 have been linked with phone numbers. But for people like Devaki, who do not have easy access to technology, it is easier said than done. Cracking down on pilferage, complaints through helplines and SMSs to PDS 107 have gotten 13 salespersons dismissed in the last four months, officials said.



When Aadhaar is made mandatory for registering deaths from October 1, the civil supplies department will greatly benefit from the move, said officials. It would enable them to remove the deceased from the system on a real-time basis, with cooperation from the bodies in charge of registering death.“Instead of relying on information from the beneficiary and conducting manual checks, we will be able to update the system every day,” said an official, adding that this would help them check misuse of ration cards and pilferage.

Linked to Aadhaar
Currently, 6,17,75,614 of the total 6,73,61,843 beneficiaries have linked their Aadhar number to ration card.

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

11975 - Centre’s food subsidy bill set to be slashed courtesy Aadhaar, PoS - Financial Express



Haryana cuts 25%, Rajasthan a fifth; ePoS-enabled fair price shops, Aadhaar-seeding of cards help.
By: Sandip Das | New Delhi | Published: September 6, 2017 5:37 AM


Rajasthan had reported a similar weeding out of fictitious beneficiaries under the National Food Security Act. (Reuters)

The state government believes that the sudden drop in the number of buyers is due to ePoS-induced transparency, which curtailed the scope for manipulation of purchase records and diversion of grains meant for the public distribution system (PDS) to the open market.The new systems for monitoring transactions at fair price shops (FPSs) are promising to help slash the Centre’s food subsidy bill, the most sticky among its revenue expenditures, after pension and interest payments. Around a quarter of ration card holders in Haryana haven’t apparently turned up for collecting the provisions since June, when all 9,500 FPSs in the state started using electronic point of sale (ePoS) machines and Aadhaar-seeding of ration cards was made mandatory.

Earlier, Rajasthan had reported a similar weeding out of fictitious beneficiaries under the National Food Security Act (NFSA): After the state’s 25,000 odd FPSs were ePoS-enabled in September last year, the beneficiary list got pruned by about 20%.

The Centre’s food subsidy bill is projected to be Rs 1.45 lakh crore in FY18, under the medium-term expenditure framework released by the finance ministry recently, and the subsidy is seen to rise to Rs 2 lakh crore in FY20.

According to SS Prasad, additional chief secretary, Haryana, who heads the state’s Food Civil Supplies Department, after the state government stopped providing monthly entitlement of grains to around 40 lakh PDS beneficiaries among the 1.24 crore people covered under NFSA in June, around 10 lakh got their Aadhaar cards made and seeded with ration cards while others haven’t since turned up at the retail shops.

Against a monthly allocation of around 66,000 tonnes of wheat from Food Corporation of India for distribution to NFSA beneficiaries, the Haryana Civil Supplies Corporation is now lifting around 50,000 tonnes of grain mainly because of the reduction in the number of beneficiaries.

Of course, death, migrant labourers going back to their respective states, persons shifting out of the state after marriage, etc, prune the PDS list. “Compulsory Aadhaar seeding has made fake ration cards redundant,” Prasad said. The Haryana government has also introduced ‘portability’ of ration cards where each beneficiary can claim 5 kg of highly subsidised wheat as monthly entitlement under NFSA across any ration shop in the state.

Haryana has 29.68 lakh ration card holders of whom more than 90% so far have had their cards seeded with Aadhaar. Those who have not seeded their ration cards have been allowed to approach any FPS in the state to submit their details.
Haryana is one of six states to have installed e-PoS machines in all FPSs, the other five being Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan. In coming months, these and other states are also expected to get rid of the redundant ration cards through Aadhaar-seeded PDS transactions and e-PoS-enabled tracking.

The government wants to make Aadhaar mandatory for receiving subsidised foodgrains under PDS, but what the Supreme Court says on this after the recent judgment making privacy a fundamental right is crucial.


Since 2013, 2.48 crore bogus/duplicate ration cards have been eliminated in the country, with potential savings of Rs 14,000 crore to the exchequer. Of a total 5.27 lakh FPSs in the country, around 47% or 2.45 lakh have installed ePoS machines. Around 80% of the total 23 crore ration cards in the country have been seeded with Aadhaar.