In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, March 31, 2011

1197 - Biometrics: Business of Identity- Source-Economic Times

29 MAR, 2011, 04.44AM IST, RITUPARNA CHATTERJEE,ET BUREAU 

At the Federal Bureau of Investigation's sprawling campus in Clarksburg, West Virginia, science fiction is coming to life. Working on its biggest investment yet, the FBI is developing the next generation of biometrics that includes 3-D facial imaging and voice recognition. The FBI is one of the many government bodies worldwide shaping the future of the biometrics revolution.

By 2015, the global biometrics market will be worth $11.2 billion, says research firm Markets and Markets (M&M). The catalyst for this revolutionary growth are governments strengthening national security in this digitised age, where multiple virtual identities are common. "Only governments can afford the kind of mega investment needed for pervasive biometric projects," says Olga Raskin, a senior consultant at the International Biometrics Group.

In Afghanistan's Helmand province, US marines are building a biometric database of opium farmers - to create identity cards for security purposes - by using handheld iris-scanners. Larger devices perform retina scans at Dubai airport, for brief transit visas. By next year, every single South African passport will be biometric. In the US, the FBI processes 160,000 to 200,000 fingerprint scans every day. "Developed biometrics are absolutely crucial to national security," says Kimberly Del Greco, chief of the biometric services section at the FBI.

The biggest biometric project of them all is India's mammoth unique identification number programme. India has issued 2 million Aadhaar cards, which are based on fingerprints and iris scans, it will issue 1 million cards every day from October.

A renowned biometrics pioneer, the FBI, has been using DNA in the form of genetic fingerprints since the 1980s to establish guilt or innocence in criminal investigations. A biometric database of about 70 million fingerprints allows the FBI to gauge in 10 minutes or less whether a person has a criminal record or not. The person could be entering or exiting the US, or applying for a school teacher's job.

"We can share biometrics with our international partners," says Del Greco. "It will give both them and the FBI additional search options, and help us curb crime faster." The need, then, is to have a large-scale, international, biometric database for our globalised, terror-plagued world.

"With biometrics, we're looking at a paradigm shift from the West to the East, driven primarily by the population," says Abhigyan Sengupta, senior research manager-semiconductors and electronics, M&M. Asia, Africa and the Middle East will emerge as biometric markets by 2013; some parts there already are. For instance, while most EU nations have had biometric passports for a while, the Middle East, which has drawn flak for terrorism-related activity, is investing heavily in them today.

Even the private sector is using biometric identification, primarily in areas like finance and banking, consumer electronics and healthcare. In Bronx, New York, iris-scans have helped a clinic reduce identification errors of its patients' medical records. In Japan, over 80,000 biometric ATMs use finger vein technology - a relatively rare and less intrusive biometric - for customer access instead of pin codes. These are used by 15 million customers. "Asia has a unique outlook on biometrics," says Raskin.

Accurate identification and reliable search are critical for further pushing the biometric revolution. "The future of biometrics really depends on people catching on. Biometric projects can fall apart if they don't use it," says Raskin. For instance, some years ago, laptops allowed you to log in with finger scans instead of passwords, but added to frustration when they did not work well. "Biometrics have a bit of a bad reputation," says Raskin. "People are averse due to the 'creep factor', as well as privacy and cultural issues. And while people can opt out as consumers, with government bodies, it's not a matter of choice."