In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, March 20, 2015

7569 - Nobody is being denied benefits minus Aadhaar: DK Mittal - Money Control

Mar 16, 2015, 05.18 PM IST | Source: CNBC-TV18 


Discussing implications of the SC move by making Aadhaar “not mandatory” to avail of services, DK Mittal, Mission Director, DBT Scheme, and Former Financial Services Secretary, said certain pilots are being initiated to link food subsidy to DBT.  

The government’s plans to scale up the direct benefit transfer (DBT) scheme received a jolt Monday with the Supreme Court holding that Aadhaar is not mandatory to avail of services. The SC has asked the Centre to ensure that no state governments are making Aadhaar cards mandatory for availing of services. 

The apex court said it will deliver a final verdict on the matter this July and also observed that states that are non-compliant will be taken to task. Discussing the implications of the move, DK Mittal, Mission Director, DBT Scheme, and Former Financial Services Secretary, said that nobody is being denied benefits minus Aadhaar and that certain pilots are being initiated to link food subsidy to DBT. 

In an interview to CNBC-TV18, Mittal said the oil ministry is working on linking kerosene to DBT. Below is the transcript of DK Mittal's interview with CNBC-TV18's Nayantara Rai. 

Q: You are the mission director of the Direct Benefit Transfer scheme which has been envisaged for the government to try and plug leakages, to try and reduce subsidies. Would you say what the Supreme Court today has said will be a setback for what you are trying to achieve? 
A: I don’t think there is any question of setback. This decision of the honourable court is earlier one and they have only reiterated that decision. Government of India and state governments are complying with it. So, I do not find any change in this instance. 

Q: If it is taking a strong stance as far as Aadhaar goes and says that is not mandatory where is it going to leave your Direct Benefit Transfer schemes if the Supreme Court were to also take a similar view of the Jan Dhan Yojna. That is what the government is today relying on for Direct Benefit Transfers. 
A: There is no fresh challenge. This challenge has arisen couple of months back when honourable court said that it should not be made mandatory till they decide the subject. So, status quo remains. Honourable court has only repeated the stand, decision taken earlier, that the status quo should be maintained. So, that is perfectly fine. In terms of doing DBT, we are looking at many methods including if the beneficiary shares an Aadhaar number, take the Aadhaar number but as per the courts direction nobody is being denied any benefit just on the ground that he or she does not have an Aadhaar number. 

Q: Has the Supreme Court had anything to say as far as the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojna scheme goes because that is what the government today is relying on and is using to make DBT a reality? 
A: There is a misconception. Linking the Jan Dhan Yojna with Aadhaar was only with the ease of money transfer. Not that money cannot be transferred without Aadhaar number. However this is a great benefit to the beneficiary once you have linked an account with Aadhaar number then multiple benefits can go to that bank account straightaway. You don’t have to give bank account number, you don’t have to give the IFSC code of the bank branch. So, it is the convenience of the beneficiary.  Even today beneficiaries after realising the benefits are voluntarily coming forward and giving these details. So, that process remains. The court has said that nobody should be denied, that’s the direction of the court and it will be complied with by the government. It is being complied. There is nothing new about it. 

Q: Can you tell me what you are working on now? We have seen the LPG DBT being quite a success, people are voluntarily giving up. Are you going to look at kerosene next, are you also looking at DBT for food, has that started even via pilot project? A: I think that is in horizon of the government to have the food – the options are with the state government. First task for us is to prepare the digitised list with their identification numbers. So, that is happening, certain pilots are being initiated in different parts of India. After those lessons are learnt and there is confidence in the state government then we will take it forward. 

Q: Is there any timeline that you are looking at as far as DBT for food goes? 
A: It will be appropriate if you reach out to ministry of food because they are the owners of the scheme and they need to tell. We are working with them and supporting them. 

Q: Kerosene? 
A: Kerosene again petroleum ministry is working on it and it will go along with the food because the beneficiary list is the same, so they will go together.