In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

8202 - Nearly 50% voters to be struck off rolls in Hyderabad district - TNN

Syed Amin Jafri, TNN | Jun 29, 2015, 05.30AM IST

HYDERABAD: This is happening in our Hyderabad. Believe it or not, the electoral registration officers (EROs) under the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) have marked out the names of 18.30 lakh voters for deletion from the electoral rolls in Hyderabad district on the ground that they have shifted residence or their houses were found locked. This means that almost 45 to 50 percent of the 40.98 lakh voters in the 15 assembly constituencies forming part of Hyderabad revenue district would get disenfranchised soon, as the process of verification by EROs is coming to a close. 

Lakhs of eligible voters, whose only 'fault' is that they remained 'elusive' to the 'invisible' block level officers (BLOs) when they had purportedly visited their houses for Aadhaar seeding, would be struck off the rolls after notices are pasted on their door numbers giving them a week's time to present themselves. It is another matter that the BLOs are supposed to obtain acknowledgement for the notices when the voters purportedly shifted from the houses or kept their premises locked! Strange are the ways of the electoral authorities indeed. 

It may be recalled that after intensive revision undertaken in the year 2013, the final electoral rolls were published on January 31, 2014, and the number of electors stood at 35, 98,152. Subsequently, the number of voters swelled to 39, 65,284 in Hyderabad district with online registrations on the eve of general elections held on April 30, 2014. Summary revision of electoral rolls was taken up again in November-December 2014 and the final rolls were published on January 17, 2015, after disposal of claims and objections. Gram sabhas and meetings of ward committees and resident welfare associations were purportedly held during the summary revision. 

As per SSR (final rolls) 2015, as many as 40,98,491 eligible voters were enrolled in the 15 assembly constituencies of Hyderabad district. Subsequently, the electoral authorities launched the "National Electoral Roll Purification and Authentication Programme" (NERPAP) in March 2015 after appointment of BLOs and supervisors. Aadhaar seeding (linking of EPIC/voter ID cards with Aadhaar cards) was taken up as part of the NERPAP. The GHMC was entrusted the task of Aadhaar seeding in Hyderabad district as GHMC commissioner is designated as the district election officer (unlike in other districts where the district collectors are DEOs). 

Door-to-door verification by the BLOs was taken up from April 1, 2015, for collection of Aadhaar details and inclusion of Aadhaar numbers in the electoral rolls, as well as for identification of the shifted/ dead or 'ineligible' voters, deletion of multiple entries and correction of errors in the rolls. The three-month-long campaign is now coming to an end. As per the latest progress report, the BLOs could collect Aadhaar details of 11,60,695 voters out of the total of 40,98,496 enrolled electors in Hyderabad district. Another 1, 12,384 voters have furnished Aadhaar details on their own. 

The BLOs have "found" that as many as 9, 85,902 voters shifted their residence and another 7,50,573 voters had locked the premises during their visits. Besides, the BLOs also noticed that 71,186 voters had duplicate EPICs, 22,946 voters were 'ineligible' and 44,037 voters were dead. These five categories of voters added up to 18, 74,644 (or 45.74 percent of total electors). Even after removal of names of dead voters, the number of voters who stand to get disenfranchised comes to 18, 30,607 or 44.66 percent. 

The fact is that 4, 86,592 voters are yet to be verified by the BLOs. Overall, about 50 percent electors (or 20 lakh voters) may lose their right to vote since they were not 'spotted' by the BLOs. It is another issue that lakhs of voters in Hyderabad may not have seen the faces of their BLOs since no one visited their houses during the Aadhaar seeding campaign. In many cases, the BLOs are also not familiar with the areas coming under their booths (polling stations) and thus indulge in 'ghost verification.' This partly explains the large number of voters marked for deletion on account of 'shifting" their residences or keeping their houses door-locked.' 

Unless the voters, political parties, resident welfare associations, non-governmental organisations and civil rights groups rise to the occasion to ensure that mass-scale deletions are not carried out by the electoral authorities, we may see the spectre of the forthcoming GHMC elections being reduced to a sham by keeping out lakhs of eligible voters from exercising their franchise, all in the name of "Aadhaar seeding" and electoral roll purification campaign, though the Supreme Court has ruled that Aadhaar cards are not mandatory. 

(The writer is an MLC and a journalist)