In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, July 26, 2015

8331 - EPFO plans online claims settlement - TNN

Shishir Arya | Jul 21, 2015, 03.24AM IST

Nagpur:
Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) is planning to launch a facility of online settlement of claims for its subscribers but this subject to at least 50% of unique account numbers (UAN) allotted by it to over 4.5 crore employees being activated. A deadline of August end has been set for the job. With this, even other subscribers are expected to be motivated for getting their number activated.

UAN is an ambitious project planned over a year ago but EPFO, also billed as the world's largest social security organization, is grappling to get it going. UANs have been allotted to almost all 4.5 crore private sector workers covered under EPFO. But no more than 15% have been activated yet. Employers, who are supposed to provide the KYC details that include Aadhaar number, PAN, bank account or driving licence for activation, are not keen on doing their bit.

In a meeting held over a week ago, it was decided to launch a special drive by contacting all major establishments and ensure that the UANs were activated. The work is planned to be completed by August end.


The accounts have to be settled if an employee retires or changes job. In this case online settlement will have to be done through the employer. This is because the employers' digital signature will be needed for access.

"There are also plans to allow the employees to directly deal with the online claims if their Aadhaar number is seeded with the activated UANs," said a source in the ministry of labour. "After this, if 50% of the accounts are Aadhaar linked, then a facility for direct online settlement will be made available."

This is because Aadhaar using biometrics is considered the best means of identification. "With enough Aadhaar penetration in the country, it is expected a majority of subscribers may have one," said the source.

It is learnt that in Nagpur region itself, 33% of over 4.30 lakh UANs allotted are now Aadhaar linked. The national average is expected to be in the same bandwidth, the source said. The employees can provide other details like PAN, Bank Account or driving licence too. As per the plan if those with Aadhaar get direct facility, even others will be encouraged to provide the number, said the source.

Everything hinges on getting the numbers activated. A carrot and stick approach has been adopted. It is mandatory for the employers to cooperate in providing the details or else they face prosecution. Even the employees are being encouraged to insist on getting their number activated. Officials expect a large number of UANs to be activated during the drive.

With a UAN, an employee could keep tab on payments in his accounts. That may be why employers were reluctant to comply, said sources.

In a Nutshell

* Project UAN is over a year old

* It provides direct access to PF accounts and also online settlement

* Almost all 4.5 crore workers have UAN

* Only 15% of those activated as employers yet to provide details

* If at least 50% UANs are activated, online settlement will begin

* If 50% also get linked with Aadhaar, direct settlement can be done