In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

8204 - Kolhapur trips on Aadhaar programme deadline - TNN

Piyush Bhusari, TNN | Jun 29, 2015, 02.08PM IST

KOLHAPUR: The primary education department in Kolhapur has admitted to its inability to meet the June 26 deadline set by the state's government for linking school students' admission registration numbers to Aadhar cards because of unavailability of machines. 

Officials in the department said the number of students, around 73,000, was too high as against the number of machines, around 80, made available for the drive and this difference has made implementation of the project difficult in the district. 

The Maharashtra government has decided to link school students' admission registration numbers to Aadhar card in order to effectively implement the Right to Education Act on the ground that this will facilitate tracking of a child in the education system. The linking will help the government verify whether students are enrolled in schools and parents can also be kept in the loop over their child's educational progress, a government resolution (GR) issued by the state said. 

Block education officers have been asked to compile data about the number of children with Aadhaar cards and forward those to respective district collectorates. The government has also asked the local administration to publicise the campaign. The RTE Act ensures that children in the 6-14 age group are not left out of the educational system. The GR said the biggest challenge to ensure success of the RTE Act is to bring non-school going children in the education fold. 

The department in Kolhapur had started with the elementary school students' Aadhaar card registration across the district in May. After a review meeting in the first week of May, district collector Amit Saini had granted 20 additional machines, which then went up to 80. The target was to cover 73,963 students. 

District primary education officer Smita Gaud said the target could not be achieved because the number of machines was too less to reach out to the potential destinations on time. Besides, the grouping of schools for the Aadhaar registration drive could also not be organized, she said. 

"The department does not have the number of students registered as part of the drive from May. We have asked the block development officers to revert to us within three days with the number. The department was willing to complete the drive on time, but inadequate machines and the holidays were a challenge," Gaud said. 

The preference to the enrolment of the pre-primary children's Aadhaar cards was also one of the factors leading to the poor response. "There is a meeting with the district collectorate on June 30, where we will discuss the current situation and ask the authorities concerned to provide us with the more machines to complete the drive," she added. 

The demand of more machines can, however, put the government notification useless, as according to it the drive was supposed to be over by June 26 because of low academic pressure and holidays till June 14. "If the department again organises such kind of a drive, when are we supposed to conduct classes? It will put an unnecessary burden on the teachers in the middle of the academic year," said a ZP school teacher. 

The review report prepared by the district primary education department, a copy of which is with the TOI, Kolhapur has 2.74 lakh students eligible for the cards, of whom 2.11 lakh students have been already enrolled with it and the department was suppose to get the remaining 73,963 students enrolled by June 26. 

Anuradha Bhosale, vice-chairman at Avani, a city-based non-governmental organisation working in the field of education, said, "The administration always plans big. But when it comes to implementation, it cannot even execute the basic plans. Aadhaar card is necessary and it will wed out the bogus students. The process should be completed at the earliest."