In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, July 18, 2015

8241 - Digital ambitions - Business Standard

E-governance roll-out needs better infrastructure, privacy protection


Business Standard Editorial Comment  |  New Delhi  July 5, 2015 Last Updated at 21:38 IST

The Digital India initiative cannot be faulted on ambition. Properly implemented, it could enable radically improved government services and also be a catalyst for rapid growth - although it is worth noting that e-governance does not by itself reduce India's absurd requirements for paperwork. But the red tape can sometimes be processed quicker. India Inc has responded enthusiastically, committing investments of over Rs 4.5 lakh crore. If those investments come to fruition, employment will be generated for about 1.8 million persons. If the targets are met, every village panchayat will have wired broadband access and every village, mobile broadband, by 2019.

However, fulfilling this vision where all citizens are digitally connected to the government will take enormous effort. Huge amounts of basic infrastructure must be created and there are serious doubts as to the system's capacity to deliver this. Just 15 million of India's 250 million households possess wired broadband and rural penetration is very low. To ensure better wired connectivity, the loss-making behemoth BSNL must improve its efficiency manifold. The Universal Service Obligation Fund must have its provisions tweaked to induce private operators to enter the wired broadband space. Although mobile penetration is high, quality is abysmal. In addition, mobile data charges are high, relative to voice charges and per capita income. There are dropped calls galore, 3G coverage is spotty and 4G roll-outs have just started. The defence services must vacate spectrum in commercial bands to alleviate scarcity. Successive governments have failed to implement this changeover for years. It is worth mentioning that India's telecom operators consume more diesel than Indian Railways. This is because power supply is inadequate to meet their demand. This too must be fixed for Digital India to work.

Quite apart from the creation of physical infrastructure, the government's own information technology systems require a major overhaul in terms of security. There is also a need for the rapid enactment of sensible, comprehensive privacy legislation. Digital India, after all, envisages storing an enormous amount of digital information about all citizens on the cloud. What is more, the government will encourage that information to be backed up by citizens in one silo - the "digital locker" - linked to their Aadhaar. If the digital locker system is hacked, or the Aadhaar system is compromised, or the cloud is hacked, it would be a nightmare on a massive scale. The government must not only develop protective measures against disaster, data theft and identity theft; it must also set up correction mechanisms to deal with citizens being declared dead in error, or subsidies transferred to the wrong account, and so on. The US Social Security system deals with around 1,200 cases of "clerical death" per month - it is important to take steps to prevent such things from happening on a much larger scale with Digital India.

Finally, the data itself must be protected better from rampant misuse by government agencies and government servants. There are multiple lacunae in current privacy laws. There are no laws safeguarding location-data privacy, or DNA-data privacy. In 2012, Justice A P Shah Commission submitted some recommendations on privacy laws. They are yet to be adopted; some may need review due to technological advances since the report was submitted. Comprehensive privacy protection must be drafted and passed into law before India can embark on this new digital journey with confidence.