In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, July 18, 2015

8248 - The Vyapam scam exposes the underbelly of a criminalised and weak state - First Post



http://www.firstpost.com/author/jagannathan

Even as the cacophony over the Vyapam ‘killer’ scam gets louder, sane people must ask themselves a basic question: why? It is perfectly all right to demand justice and send the corrupt and the guilty - both those who participated in the Vyapam examination scam and those who may be involved in bumping off inconvenient people who may know too much - but if we do not ask the deeper ‘why’ question, we would have missed another opportunity to fix the problem at the roots.

Why are so many people dying in Vyapam? What is so special about this examination-related corruption scandal that so many people are paying with their lives, and in full view of the media and the court of public opinion?

To me it is simply not credible to suggest that all this is happening because someone higher up is trying to silence people who know who did what in the scam. The fact is too many people knew too much – which means the scam was an open secret for years - and predates Shivraj Singh Chouhan. 

Moreover, even criminal minds do not continue bumping off people when the whole world is watching.

The only logical answer to the ‘why’ question may be this: the system has gone so rotten, that the state has become a semi-criminal enterprise, aided by the apathy and amorality of the less powerful and the powerless. I would also argue that we have ourselves - citizen and media - compromised so much with a criminal system, that we no longer have the moral authority to protest, never mind how much Arnab Goswami may yell and scream and hector on the TV screen. He is merely adding to the din by playing Cacofonix No 1.

We thought change was at hand with the exit of the corrupt UPA and the rise of a Narendra Modi, an Arvind Kejriwal and an Anna movement that preceded their rise. But the problem clearly is larger than both of them. And Anna certainly did not have all the answers. A Modi in Delhi can do little when the states are run by other powerful politicians, and a Kejriwal can do little if the centre is at loggerheads with him most of the time. Centre and states are paralysing each other, wrestling each other to a standstill while the corrupt system continues to squeeze us all.

File photo of Shivraj Singh Chouhan with Narendra Modi. 
AFP

The central message coming from the Vyapam scam - where despite hundreds of arrests, people are still dying - is that the law no longer matters. The state has become so weak, that individuals, both powerful and not-so-powerful ones, are able to ignore the law and suborn the system. The line separating state actors from criminals is now deeply blurred. Even if Shivraj Singh Chouhan and the Madhya Pradesh BJP fail to survive Vyapam, the corrupt system will. A weak state is custom-built for a criminal system to operate as a super-state.

The characteristics of a weak state are the following:

One, the law and institutions matter less than powerful individuals. Look around you: every political party is headed by a powerful personality, who dominates it solo.

Two, weak states use strong, anti-liberal laws to maintain order. India is nothing but a weak state run by draconian laws - from the UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act) to SC/ST laws to anti-dowry and anti-domestic violence laws to draconian black money control laws. You can go to jail under these laws even with very little evidence against you, and only the powerful can find a way around it.

Three, a weak state can coerce the citizen using a faceless, inflexible rulebook. Consider the case of Aadhaar, the unique ID system. With no law to back it or any guarantee about the privacy of your personal data, Aadhaar has been pushed all over India using the bureaucracy even though the Supreme Court has said it cannot be mandatory; if you protest, you won't get anywhere as the legal system is out-of-reach and expensive. A weak state can be tyrannical by indirectly empowering the babu at the last mile to play god with the citizen. The peon at the registrar's office, who denies you a registration for want of an Aadhaar, will, if you protest, simply tell you he is following rules. Your bank will keep exhorting you to link your accounts to Aadhaar. Reason: they don’t want to get into a tangle with their ministry bosses.

Four, a weak state can easily be taken over by criminal elements for those who threaten bodily harm to unprotected government officials, whistleblowers or the ordinary citizen will carry clout with everybody. The citizen no longer expects much help against criminals from the police; if your daughter is being threatened by local goons, you have a better chance of protecting her by paying the goon's boss than by filing a report with the police. Not only are the police compromised, but we simply do not have enough policemen to give us even a modicum of protection. This is why even when there is so much scrutiny of Vyapam, people are running scared. There are too many people who need protection, and no one can be sure if the people providing the protection are themselves compromised or not.

Five, more than the centre, it is our states that have become really criminalised. A Modi will be subjected to national and international scrutiny, but not a Akhilesh Yadav, a Mamata Banerjee, a Navin Patnaik, a J Jayalalithaa, or a Nitish Kumar. 

Move away from the big metros, where the big media are based, and you have jungle raj in most states. It's not just about Madhya Pradesh. Most state-level crimes everywhere go under the radar. At best they get local coverage, unless the rise in body count suddenly catches the national media's eye, as it did in the case of Vyapam. “Discovering scams” is also part of the system. Every political party runs its own unaccountable media, both to support a personality cult around the boss and to “unearth” scams that will target the ruling party. Once governments change, the system merely passes to other hands. This is how the media becomes a law unto itself, and is also a covert supporter of the system.

ALSO SEE

Six, the weak state is not just about the executive. It is about all institutions of the state, including the judiciary. Those who think the judiciary is the key to change will find only limited success. 
Ask yourself: 
why is it that even after so many Supreme Court-monitored investigations, nothing much has come to light in any scam? 

Also, how is it that so many Supreme Court judges find easy employment on various quasi-judicial bodies after retirement? Why is it that a Shanti Bhushan can openly allege that eight former chief justices were corrupt, but the court, far from hauling him up for contempt and attempt to intimidate the judiciary, merely shrugged and never inquired into it. 

Why is it that despite anecdotal evidence of judicial corruption, no judge has ever gone to jail? 

Why is the Supreme Court even now battling to retain the opaque collegiums system of judges appointing judges when the overwhelming vote of parliament and state legislatures was against it?

Clearly, a weak state is underpinned by a weak judiciary. The fact that it sometimes comes up with roaring judgments does not mean it is powerful enough to uphold the law unequivocally.

I don’t know how this can be reversed, but the tell-tale signs of a change will be the following: the police will be reformed and given functional autonomy with no political interference; the state will focus on governance and providing public goods (clean air, water, law and order, justice, economic reforms, infrastructure), and not private subsidies (oil, power and food subsidies to the undeserving); the judiciary will restrict itself to interpreting the law and not try to interfere in every other area of executive action (gleaning the Ganga or chasing black money is not its job); government reduces direct interface with the people by making some kinds of permissions automatic or through e-portals; policy-making is separated from running public enterprises; elections are publicly funded – among other things.

Till we start doing these things, India will continue to be a weak state.