In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, August 27, 2016

10306 - Now, newborns to get Aadhaar at birth, courtesy Narendra Modi govt - Financial Express


In a drive to give every citizen the unique identification number (UID) Aadhaar — currently, 80% of the population has exclusive numbers and identity borne out by biometrics...


By: Prasanta Sahu | New Delhi | Updated: August 3, 2016 6:45 AM

NITI Aayog had recently held a meeting with top officials of all states to get them on board for widening of Aadhaar coverage.

In a drive to give every citizen the unique identification number (UID) Aadhaar — currently, 80% of the population has exclusive numbers and identity borne out by biometrics — the Narendra Modi government has asked the states to assign Aadhaar to newborns at the time of their birth registration.

While these numbers will initially be linked to the UIDs of parents, as a child turns five, she/he will be re-enrolled with biometrics of 10 fingers, iris and facial photograph. The biometrics will be updated when the child turns 15.

As per the Registration of Birth and Death Act 2012, it is mandatory to get birth (as also marriage and death) registered at the place of occurrence within a year (failing which the registration can be done only under a magisterial order).

The government’s latest move is in line with the ambitious plan to provide all central-sector and centrally sponsored benefits to people via the direct benefit transfer (DBT) platform, enabled with Aadhaar and the Jan Dhan drive to ensure bank accounts for each household.

NITI Aayog had recently held a meeting with top officials of all states to get them on board for widening of Aadhaar coverage. Besides giving Aadhaar to newborns, the Centre has asked the states to hold enrolment camps twice a year in every anganwadi for children below five years and organise such camps in every school at least twice a year. These will help collect/update biometrics of each student.

The Centre has advised the states to use Aadhaar-based DBT platform for delivery of state-level benefits as provided in Section 7 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016.
The section provides that the Centre/state may require individuals getting government benefits to undergo authentication or furnish Aadhaar number. The Act was passed by Parliament during the Budget session in the wake of the Supreme Court’s interim order against making Aadhaar mandatory for receiving such benefits.

Keen to utilise the DBT platform to plug leakages in delivery of sundry benefits and doles, the government has already put 74 schemes on the DBT platform. The DBT enabler, JAM (Jan Dhan, Aadhaar and Mobile), has resulted in cumulative savings of R36,500 crore for the Centre in subsidies such as on cooking gas, food, wages under the employment guarantee Act etc. It disbursed R1.3 lakh crore as on June 30 via the DBT facility since January, 2013.

Encouraged by the success of DBT in schemes such as PAHAL for providing subsidised cooking gas, which resulted in savings to the tune of R14,672 crore in FY15 (the CAG later disputed this figure), the Centre has firmed up a timeline to bring all schemes under the platform. So, it plans to implement Aadhaar-linked DBT for all central schemes in Union Territories by September 30, scholarship schemes across the country by November 30 and all central schemes for PDS (food and kerosene), agriculture insurance, rural employment, housing and Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana by March 31, 2017.



The Centre has also asked the states to enlist the help of NGOs, who are getting aid from the government for using their expertise in universalisation of Aadhaar use. The government has also initiated a major technology initiative with features to update beneficiary data regularly and link all existing database across departments at state and central level.

The scope of DBT has been expanded to cover non-monetary transfers (in kind) to various enablers of government schemes like community health workers, anganwadi workers, etc.