AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 10568 - Traffic cops’ Aadhaar Card rule comes under fire

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, December 9, 2016

10568 - Traffic cops’ Aadhaar Card rule comes under fire - TNN

Traffic cops’ Aadhaar Card rule comes under fire

TNN | Updated: Nov 3, 2016, 01.10 AM IST

Hyderabad: City police commissionerates are increasingly coming under fire in court over some of their new methods of tackling crime. Asking motorists for Aadhaar cards and fining people on the basis of photographs of traffic offences taken by cops are not going down well with a lot of motorists.

Last month, city-based advocate Y Soma Raju filed a PIL in the high court challenging the order of Cyberabad traffic police issued on July 23 asking all motorists to compulsorily carry Aadhaar cards.

After hearing the PIL at length, the high court on October 18 directed the home department to furnish an affidavit explaining under which provision of law the police had asked people to carry Aadhaar cards.

Cyberabad police filed an affidavit on Tuesday saying they were asking for the card to get details of offenders. Since there was no existing provision in law which made it compulsory for a motorist to carry an Aadhaar card, the cops made it optional while carrying out its enforcement tasks.

"While entering details of traffic offenders in computer tablets, driving license or Aadhaar details are sought to generate challans. We are asking for Aadhaar details mainly to establish the true identity and address of offenders if they fail to produce a license," DCP (traffic-II), Hyderabad, AV Ranganath said.

Local residents have found some other issues also very bothersome. A medical practitioner Dr C Lakshmi of Prashant Nagar in Vanasthalipuram filed a writ petition in the high court in late October challenging the validity of e-challans generated through photographs of traffic violations taken by cops using cameras.

The petitioner narrated to the court an incident when traffic cops stopped the vehicle as she drove her car at Vanasthalipuram in September. After verification of documents, the police asked her to pay pending challans issued by Cyberabad police to the tune of Rs 1,805.

"The police advised me to pay the challans immediately and threatened to impound my vehicle if I didn't. These traffic challans are illegal because the tickets were issued when on most occasions I was not in my car," the petitioner said before the court. Based on the petition, the high court asked Cyberabad police to furnish its response in the form of an affidavit.

Cyberabad traffic DCP AR Srinivas said all e-challans were being issued under Section 133 of the MV Act (duty of owner of motor vehicle to give information) which means, it was the responsibility of the owner of the vehicle to give details of the driver or conductor. "The e-challan system is a time-tested enforcement practice adopted by police across the globe. In view of the low number of police personnel compared to the number of motorists, issuing an e-challan with photo proof is crucial to keep a check on traffic violators," Srinivas said.

Blurb

Quote

Top Comment

Trust the Telangana traffic police to convert the noble welfare objective of the introduction of Aadhar card into a tool for catching criminals. From tomorrow, the ordinary unsuspecting innocent citi... Read More

GK Reddy

In view of the low number of police personnel compared to the number of motorists, issuing an e-challan with photo proof is crucial to keep a check on traffic violators

AR Srinivas, traffic DCP, Cyberabad