In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

11209 - Cash deposits above Rs 2L to be disclosed in ITR forms - Deccan Herald

Cash deposits above Rs 2L to be disclosed in ITR forms

Chetan Chandak, Apr 30 2017, 23:58 IST


The government’s war against black money is finding its expression in every reform that it makes. The recent being the introduction of the new one-page ITR forms. Where these forms are making it way easier for taxpayers to file their returns than before, it also seeks details of cash deposits of more than Rs 2 lakh made during the demonetisation period. Taxpayers will now have to give details about the money (more than Rs 2 lakh) deposited between November 9 and December 30. Part E of the form will have columns for these details to be filled up by the taxpayer. 

The intention as specified by the government is only to collect data for the cash deposited by individuals and that they do not intend to send any notices to anyone through this exercise. The government has also clarified that they will not question any individual depositing cash below Rs 2.5 lakh during that period.

The intention of the government behind this can be manifold since it will generate a lot of database. 

Some of the possible areas of generating useful information can be as follows: 

Aggregation of all the amounts deposited across all bank accounts

This information will give the aggregate amount of cash deposited in all the accounts of an individual including the accounts where the taxpayer’s PAN is not registered. Hence, all the accounts that are not yet mapped to PAN numbers will be disclosed in the ITR form. 

To identify all those taxpayers who have deposited cash of more than Rs 2.5 lakh

Secondly, its main intention can be to identify those taxpayers who have deposited cash in excess of Rs 2.5 lakh during the demonetisation period. The tax department will try to reconcile the treatment of these deposits in the tax return and check whether the taxpayer has offered it under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna (paying 50% taxes and depositing 25% in the scheme) or has given some different treatment.
In case the tax department identifies that the taxpayer has failed to disclose it in the tax return or has offered it under the normal provisions of the act and paid the taxes accordingly as per the normal rate, it will further investigate into the reasonability of such treatment. If the taxpayer fails to provide proper justification, he may have to pay tax @60% + surcharge @25% of such tax along with education cess @3% totaling to 77.25%. In addition tothis he may also be subjected to penalty of 10% and prosecution under The Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016. 

The only way to avoid this penalty isto disclose the details of cash deposited during the demonetization period in the tax return. Further if the source of these cash deposits cannot be explained then offering it under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna as discussed above is a safe option. 

The government with all these measures is making sure that there is minimum hassle to even those who might have huge reserves of black money by taking advantage of the schemes. 

Apart from this, the new ITR forms have some more new fields that are marked mandatory like quoting of the 12 digit Aadhaar enrolment number. This will also help in tracking those who have not enrolled for Aadhaar. Statistics reveal that although 111 crore people in India are already enrolled under Aadhaar, there are only 25 crore PAN card holders. 

Government tax reforms in the recent times are all aimed at better compliance at the same time making sure that their intention to eradicate black money from the system is fulfilled. Although these measures might seem tedious for the common man at large there are larger benefits in these that will help make lives easier for everyone. 

(The writer is Head of Tax Research, H&R Block India)