AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 11723 - Flaws in Aadhaar data security: Investigators

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, August 6, 2017

11723 - Flaws in Aadhaar data security: Investigators - Indian Express

Flaws in Aadhaar data security: Investigators

By Akram Mohammed | Express News Service | Published: 05th August 2017

BENGALURU: Even as Cyber Crime wing of the police is looking into the case of illegal access to Aadhaar database, a few independent investigators have discovered a security flaw in the Aadhaar system.

Cyber security experts said that the flaw can be used to get SIM cards, opening bank accounts etc.

Meanwhile, police officials who are probing the case are looking the technical details on how the accused Abhinav Srivasatav got the required access to provide e-KYC, and how the database did not display the name of the KYC agency calling the server to provide Aadhaar verification and others.

Sources from Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) said that the accused might have accessed passwords by hacking or ‘piggy-backing’ on E-Hospital - a healthcare delivery platform developed by National Informatics Centre (NIC).

Independent investigators, who are analysing the ‘Aadhaar e-KYC’ application, ruled out the possible hacking into the Central Identities Data Repository.

Cyber analyst Anand Venkatanarayanan, who verified the process employed by the Android app, felt that the owner of the application might have reused a licence key from one of the User Agencies - either Authentication User Agency or KYC User Agency.

Apart from it, the code of the app, allowed it to run against the production database without displaying the name of the agency running the programme, leading to violation of Aadhaar Act.

One of the other shortcomings, discovered during the analysis was that the app did not use OTP or fingerprint authentication but the demographic authentication. Though the OTP and fingerprint authentication has some security features, demographic authentication is forbidden under law, since it uses name or mobile number or Aadhaar to verify the credentials.

“Since demographic authentication does not require notifying the holders via email and/or mobile phone, it opens up the terrible possibility that these holders details could have been used as eKYC for getting SIM cards, opening bank accounts etc. While we have no data to indeed claim that this did happen, this is a massive security hole in the entire eco-system and must be plugged immediately,” Venkatanarayanan wrote in a blog related to the case.

Until the security hole is plugged, using Aadhaar as eKYC is no better than existing paper based KYC process. The primary purpose of using eKYC is that it provides a safety net for residents against their paper based KYC documents getting forged and used without their knowledge for illegal purposes, he added.

There is no breach of any Aadhaar data: UIDAI

Following the arrest, UIDAI issued a release on Tuesday, stating, “The UIDAI has carefully gone into the matter and would like to inform and reassure public that there is no breach of any Aadhaar data and compromise of individual’s privacy and security in this case.” “As far as the said App is concerned, it was trying to provide Aadhaar verification to the residents based upon their own consent and to download their own demographic data. Hence, alleged privacy violations reported in some section of media is not true as no one could get any data of any other person through this App. Aadhaar data remains fully safe and secure.” “Aadhaar based authentication is robust and secure as compared to any other contemporary systems,” the release added.