In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, August 18, 2017

11796 - ‘Enact data protection law soon’ - The Hindu


BENGALURU, AUGUST 16, 2017 21:37 IST
UPDATED: AUGUST 1

India’s tech community, including technology billionaire Nandan Nilekani, who spearheaded Aadhaar, say India quickly needs a “data protection law.”
Mr. Nilekani said the country needed a strategic position on data which represented risks such as colonisation, privacy issues and a “winner-takes-all market,” in which the best players are able to seize a very big portion of the rewards, and the remaining contenders are left with very little. “Data is being vacuumed out of the country and going into unaccountable systems that don't come under Indian law, which probably share data with foreign governments,” he said at an event here organised by Carnegie India, a think tank. “How do you protect people's privacy and how do you make companies accountable.” Mr. Nilekani said that the law also has to make it incumbent on the data collector to immediately notify if there is any data breach.

Due to the rapid adoption of smartphones, digital payments, social media platforms and Aadhaar authentications, Mr. Nilekani said that India is going to become data rich very quickly, but there is a need to strategically think about data in a way that people of the country benefit from it. “We are running out of time, it is happening at a very fast pace.”

The government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi has appointed a committee of experts led by former Supreme Court judge, Justice B.N. Srikrishna, to identify “key data protection issues” and recommend methods to address them.

Data inversion
Mr. Nilekani proposed a concept called 'data inversion' which puts the creator of the data at the centre where she can have access to her own information and take it back. This would make sure that Indians are able to use their own data to improve their lives such as getting better credit or improve productivity on the farm. Mr. Nilekani said that India is a hugely underserved market for credit. “All credit goes to the big guys, they all go to London (Vijay Mallya). The small guy doesn't get the credit from the financial system as they don't have enough data about these guys,” he said.

Mr. Nilekani was of the view that this is 'inversion of data' is not protectionism but empowering the users as global as well as Indian companies should function in an open competitive market. However the there has to be a strategic framework or law which decides how data can be collected and used. “This has nothing to do with Indian or foreign companies. Let every body flourish,” he said.

Sharad Sharma, co-founder of software product think tank iSPIRT, which works closely with hundred of product firms was of the view that India has an opportunity not to replicate the data protection laws and framework of countries like Europe, China and the US but build a system which is intuitive to the country. This is also because such systems in regions like Europe were built before the advent smart phones and new technologies like artificial intelligence and Internet of Things. “Ultimately we need educated users, people who know what to do with their data. It requires some public education, we have already seen it for people to adopt digital payments,” he said.
Rahul Matthan, a partner at law firm Trilegal, said that data protection around the world is based on the consent given by the user, but there needs an additional level to be imposed in the form of accountability. He said there is a need to have a legal framework which prevents data controllers from using consent as an indemnity for all the actions. “Add a layer of protection for the user in the centre. We don't need consent, we need accountability,” he said.