In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, January 4, 2018

12613 - Aadhaar and Hunger: Second Jharkhand Woman Starves to Death After Being Refused Rations - The Wire


Technical glitches in the delivery of rations and pension led to the death of a 67-year-old widow in Garhwa district.


Etwariya Devi’s house in Jharkhand. Credit: Right to Food Campaign

A second death related to faults within the Aadhaar-based Public Distribution System (PDS) has come to light in Jharkhand. On December 25, Etwariya Devi, a 67-year-old widow, reportedly died due to starvation in Sonpurwa village of Garhwa district’s Majhiaon block.

Her family was reportedly unable to procure food after the Aadhaar-enabled point of sales (PoS) machine couldn’t authenticate the biometrics of her daughter-in-law.
The Right to Food Campaign, which has been spearheading the fight of the poor and the marginalised for their right to rations, released a fact-finding report five days after the widow’s death and wrote of how the incident proves that problems with Aadhaar authentication are leading to not just the deprivation of much-needed grains to the very needy and poor, but also resulting in their deaths.
On December 1, Premani Kunwar, a 64-year-old widow, died because of glitches in the alleged Aadhaar-bank integration system. The campaign had then charged that Kunwar died of hunger and exhaustion in Danda block of Garhwa district after the State Bank of India (SBI) had diverted her old-age pension. It said that while the elderly woman had been receiving her pension till September, it was redirected to the SBI bank account of one Shanti Devi in Piprakala branch, which lies 22 km from Danda. Shanti Devi had died 25 years ago and was the first wife of Kunwar’s husband, late Mutur Mahto.
Kunwar’s death came barely days after Jharkhand food and civil supplies minister Saryu Roy admitted to the government’s mistake in an alleged starvation death case.

No pension, no ration
In the latest case, the Right to Food Campaign said Etwariya lived with her son Ghura Vishwakarma, daughter-in-law Usha Devi and their three children in a dilapidated house. The family led a hand-to-mouth existence and survived on bare meals of rice and salt.
As per the Campaign, “The shortage of food worsened for Etwariya Devi when the family was denied ration from October to December 2017 and she did not get her pension for the months of November and December.”
It said the family was denied their monthly entitlement of 25 kg of grain under the National Food Security Act for three months preceding her death. In October, her daughter-in-law Usha Devi’s fingerprint could not be authenticated in the Aadhaar-based biometric PoS machine at the local ration shop and she was told to come back some other day. When she did, she was told that the stock had finished. In fact, no grain was distributed at the ration shop in December till Etwariya Devi’s death as the PoS machine was allegedly dysfunctional.
A corrupt system
The report also highlights a general complaint made by villagers in Sonpurwa that the dealer does not distribute ration as per the transactions made in the PoS machine. “In October, for most ration card holders, he transacted twice the monthly entitlement of grain and kerosene quantities but distributed for only a month,” the report says.
The denial of ration to Etwariya’s family, the Campaign said, is yet another example of the disruptions in the PDS caused by its mandatory integration with Aadhaar.
“Dealers have started tampering with digital records in order to hide accumulated stocks. One way they do this is to separate authentication and distribution – get people’s fingerprints and/or tell them that they would get rations later, and then play hide-and-seek. As per the online records, ration was allotted to the dealer for October-December. But the dealer did not distribute ration to many cardholders claiming that he did not have adequate ration stock. These irregularities show that the introduction of Aadhaar-based biometric authentication has failed to curb leakages in the PDS. In fact, it has created new barriers to the access of rations,” the report reads.
Monetary issues
Every month, Etwariya Devi would receive her old-age pension of Rs 600 in her Aadhaar-linked bank account at the local Community Service Provider (CSP) centre (under Jharkhand Grameen Bank). She last collected her pension in October 2017.
In November, no money was credited in her account. When she went to withdraw her pension for December, after authenticating her fingerprint, the CSP operator told her that the authentication had failed. But as per her bank statement, a transaction of Rs 600 was made on December 8.
In the CSP model of banking, the Campaign said, money is electronically transferred from a customer’s account to that of the CSP operator once the customer authenticates the Aadhaar-based transaction. Once the money is credited to the CSP’s account, the payment is made to the customer. But according to the CSP operator at Sonpurwa, internet connectivity was disrupted just after Etwari Devi authenticated her fingerprint and thus her pension was not credited to the CSP account.
Another sorry example
The Campaign said the starvation death of another person in the same district exposes the government’s lack of seriousness towards addressing very pressing issues. “Disruptions in the delivery of ration and pension in Jharkhand continue unabated. For those living on the margins, denial of such crucial entitlements leads to the violation of mere right to life,” the reports says.
In light of this tragedy, the Jharkhand Right to Food Campaign has sought the immediate dismissal of the ration dealer in Sonpurwa and a registration of an FIR against him for embezzling PDS grain and tampering of with records. It has also sought immediate shift to “offline” delivery of PDS entitlements; transfer of all ration shop licenses from private dealers to gram panchayats or self-help groups; and the introduction of pulses and edible oil in the PDS.


Liked the story? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.-