In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, January 22, 2018

12724 - Aadhaar-Enabled Starvation in Narendra Modi’s ‘New India’ - The Wire

Aadhaar-Enabled Starvation in Narendra Modi’s ‘New India’

Prime minister Modi’s ambitious strides in search of a ‘New India’, coupled with his government’s disdain for welfare, are leaving basic lifelines of the poor far behind.

Aaadhar-enabled violations are not limited to Jharkhand only.  Credit: Reuters
Prime Minister Narendra Modi talks of a ‘New India’ that will “make Gandhiji and Babasaheb Ambedkar proud”. One cantake a ‘I am New India’ pledge on his website and mobile application. According to this pledge, New India is characterised by peace, unity, brotherhood and freedom from corruption, terrorism, black money and dirt. While all of these are worthwhile ambitions, the pledge is questionably silent on the gross deprivations faced by a majority of the country’s population. One would expect that in a country plagued by the ‘unfreedoms’ of hunger, undernutrition and poor health, the fulfilment of basic needs would rank high in the vision for a ‘New India’. For at least nine people across the country, these ‘unfreedoms’ have culminated in their death in the last few months.
Five of these deaths happened in BJP-ruled Jharkhand, a state on its way towards becoming the ‘New Jharkhand’ as claimed by its chief minister Raghubar Das. All the families that lost thier members due to hunger lived in extreme deprivation and routinely suffered from shortages of food and nutrition. For example, it is not uncommon for Garhwa district’s 67-year-old Etwariya Devi’s family to survive only on a daily meal of rice and salt or to end the day with a hungry stomach in the absence of adequate grains at home. They have to borrow food from neighbours at times, provided the neighbours have the grain to spare. The family has not eaten dal for the past several months, as prices of pulses have skyrocked. In the absence of adequate work in the village, Etwariya’s son has been forced into distress migration. Over the past few years, the family has taken loans of around Rs 3,600 that it is unable to repay. It is also yet to pay the local desidoctor Rs 1,000 against medical expenses incurred in the last one year.


The state of semi-starvation of these families intensified after disruptions in delivery of rations under the Public Distribution System and social security pensions, eventually leading to the death of a family member. And, for at least four of these families, Aadhaar, a key element of the prime minister’s vision for ‘New India’, was instrumental in causing this fatal discontinuation of services.
Simdega district’s Santoshi Kumari’s family was denied grains for five months as its ration card was cancelled in the absence of its linkage with their Unique Identity (UID) numbers. Ruplal Marandi of Deoghar did not get ration for two months as he was unable to authenticate his fingerprints at the electronic point-of-sale (PoS) machine (for Aadhaar-based biometric authentication). Garhwa’s Premani Kunwar succumbed to starvation after she was denied her ration for two months. Etwariya Devi of the same district passed away after the shortage of food in her family worsened when it did not receive her grain entitlements for three months before her death. In both Premani’s and Etwariya’s cases, the ration dealers did not give them grains citing glitches and is said to have fudged the Aadhaar-based digital transaction records to hide the accumulated stock of grains with him.
Premani’s old-age pension for the last two months went to someone else’s bank account that got linked with her Aadhaar without her knowledge. Etwariya could not withdraw her pension for the last month from her Aadhaar-linked bank account as internet connectivity disrupted when she was authenticating her thumbprint at the PoS machine.
Representational image. Credit: PTI
In blatant violation of multiple orders of the Supreme Court that prohibit making Aadhaar mandatory for public services, the central government has made Aadhaar essential for claiming welfare entitlements either through notifications or on the sly. This is leading to violation of the constitutionally enshrined right to life of people.
Aaadhar-enabled violations are not limited to Jharkhand. In July 2017, three brothers died of hunger in Karnataka after they were denied rations for six months for not possessing UID numbers. A 50-year-old paralysed woman starved to death in Uttar Pradesh in November 2017. She was denied her grain entitlement for a month as she could not go to the fair price shop to authenticate her identity in the PoS machine. These deaths are just the tip of the iceberg of the number of people for whom hunger has worsened because of these disruptions in welfare programmes.


The right to life has been interpreted to mean not just mere survival, but a life of dignity. This understanding forms the basis of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), the National Food Security Act 2013 (NFSA) and multiple Supreme Court orders that together make access to basic services such as food, nutrition and employment guarantee legal entitlements.
While these legislations and court orders are far from providing sufficient economic protection to the poor, they are important lifelines to just stay alive. It was hoped that, over time, these legislations will be built upon, but central government’s insistence on their linkage with Aadhaar has instead weakened them. Also, they are not even being implemented in the spirit in which they were enacted in the first place. The families of Santoshi, Premani and Etwariya could not access their right to work, as NREGA was almost non-existent in their villages. There is also a visible effort by the government to dilute the basic principles of welfare. For example, instead of increasing the quantum, coverage and timeliness of social security pensions, the government seems to be focusing more on contributory pension schemes, such as the Atal Pension Yojana.
It is evident that Modi’s ambitious strides in search of a ‘New India’, coupled with his government’s disdain for welfare, are leaving the basic lifelines of the poor far behind. In this journey, the prime minister would do well to remember Gandhiji’s talisman – before taking any action one should always contemplate whether the action will “lead to swaraj for the hungry”.
Siraj Dutta is based in Jharkhand and has been working on the MNREGA for the last six years.