In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, April 6, 2018

13204 - When a minister expresses doubts about linking Aadhaar to voter ID, it smacks of cynicism - The Print

RUHI TEWARI 5 April, 2018


A file image of law minister Ravishankar Prasad |Facebook

Linking Aadhaar to voter ID can effectively check duplication and ghost voting and clean up the election process.

For a government that is linking Aadhaar to every conceivable aspect of our lives and fighting a tough court battle to defend the identity system, a personal comment by its own minister about not linking it to the voter ID is a bit rich.

Earlier this week, minister for IT and electronics Ravi Shankar Prasad had aired a “personal view” that Aadhaar and voter ID cards must not be linked “since they serve different purposes”.

Linking Aadhaar to voter ID cards is aimed at eliminating duplication and ghost voters — a goal that forms the basis of linking Aadhaar to most other services/applications. It is not uncommon for citizens to move from one part of the country to another, and obtain fresh voter ID cards without giving up their earlier ones. Aadhaar can effectively address this duplication and keep a check on ghost voting. The Election Commission of India has, in fact, linked as many as 32 crore Aadhaar numbers to voters’ ID cards already.

Many have raised concerns about the contradiction that would come with linking Aadhaar and voter IDs since the former is meant for all residents, while the latter is restricted to only those who are citizens of the country. The fact, however, is that having an Aadhaar number will not make you eligible to get a voter ID, which will still be a decision taken by the ECI on the basis of whether you qualify to get one.

In states like Assam, where illegal immigration from Bangladesh has been a political and social flashpoint, Aadhaar penetration has anyway been kept deliberately low until the National Register for Citizens to ascertain citizenship is updated. Even if Aadhaar is linked to voter IDs in such areas, it would not complicate matters since those with valid voting rights are technically citizens of the country.

The minister’s view on such linking is, thus, peculiar. “The larger issue is that if everything is linked to Aadhaar, then the great supporters of anti-Aadhaar will say that the Narendra Modi government is snooping on everything…what you are eating, which cinema you are going. I don’t want that,” he claimed.

Going by this reasoning, the government should stop linking Aadhaar to anything, if it is so concerned about being accused of “snooping”. The biggest concerns about “snooping” have been raised by the need to link the biometric ID to bank accounts, phone numbers and other similar requirements. Voter ID and Aadhaar linkage can hardly invite harsher criticism, given the ECI already knows when a voter has exercised her/his right to vote.

His point about both the documents being meant for different purposes also appears strange. Aadhaar is linked to a document/service not because it serves the same purpose as what it is linked to, but because the government believes it can make delivery far more efficient and transparent.


Serious doubts about motives will surface if the government that propagates Aadhaar’s synchronisation with different services now questions the need to link it to voter IDs. The problem of ghost voters benefits political parties differently at different times. Demanding transparency in all spheres but finding reasons to exclude areas that directly affect your political fortunes, unfortunately, smacks of cynicism. This can hardly help a government, which is currently in the midst of an elaborate court battle to defend the need for Aadhaar and address privacy concerns.