In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, April 26, 2018

13357 - 1.3 lakh Aadhaar numbers leaked from Andhra govt website, linked to personal details - New Minute

Aadhar

The Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation page showed the address, mobile number, ration card number, occupation, religion, caste and Aadhaar number, along with bank details.


Image for representation

The Andhra Pradesh government has potentially made public the Aadhaar data of at least 1.34 lakh citizens in the state, along with their other details like their religion, caste and bank details among other things. 
The names were part of a list titled ‘Beneficiary Details belonging to Entry Report for Scheme Hudhud’ and were available on the website of the Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation.
The page clearly showed the father’s name, address, Panchayat, mobile number, ration card number, occupation, religion, caste, Aadhaar number, along with other details including their bank details like bank branch, IFSC code and account number.
The issue was brought to light by Srinivas Kodali, an independent researcher and Aadhaar whistle-blower.
Speaking to TNM, Srinivas said, "AP has always been at the forefront of implementing Aadhaar, but in a larger context, this is not just about Aadhaar numbers being public. This shows that they have linked it with other private details."
This is in conflict with the Unique Identification Authority of India's (UIDAI) stand that it does not link any of these details with the Aadhaar number.
"While UIDAI is not doing it, other government departments are. Here is proof that UIDAI has no idea what all is being linked to your unique id," Srinivas had tweeted, when he first exposed the website. 




It has always been said #Aadhaar is being linked to religion and caste information, apart from occupation. While UIDAI is not doing it, other government departments are. Here is proof that UIDAI has no idea what all is being linked to your unique id. Website reported early today.






The website which was leaking all the sensitive information today was of Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation. Here are two images with details one showing last four digits of #Aadhaar after fix & other masked by me showing first two. Around 1,34,193 Aadhaar numbers leaked
"This is not the first leak and it won't be last. The site was very easy to access and it was also possible to download all the files as a sheet," Srinivas said.  
He has since reported the issue to the authorities.
"While they fixed the Aadhaar numbers which were made public, other details of the citizens are still on the site in the name of transparency. It would still be an invasion of the right to privacy," Srinivas added.
This information could potentially be used to profile people, especially by political parties and corporations. 
"Telangana and Andhra had conducted a survey a massive survey after bifurcation and collected a lot of data. Andhra went much ahead and let people carry phones and biometric readers when the private information of almost every citizen was collected," Srinivas says. 
In May 2017, a report by The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) revealed that the Aadhaar details along with demographic details and financial information of around 135 million people in the country has been leaked by four government portals. 
The report also pointed to the Andhra Pradesh portal of the NREGA, which carried information on Aadhaar numbers and disbursal amounts on a simple text file, with no encryption or other security measures, potentially endangering the data of 2 crore people in the state. 
Despite all this, authorities in Andhra Pradesh could get away easily, due to The Andhra Pradesh Core Digital Data Authority (Effective Delivery of e-services) Act, which was passed by the state’s Legislative Assembly in May last year.



Nobody is responsible for today's #Aadhaar data leak from AP govt. AP has it's own Aadhaar Act which says no official is responsible for security of the data. Act came into force after a 20 million Aadhaar numbers leak in May 2017.
“AP has its own Aadhaar Act, which was issued through a Government Order, weeks after the massive leak was reported. While other states like Karnataka also have this, it is usually a ‘copy-paste’ job from the Act passed by the Central government,” Srinivas explains.
“However, AP added its own version with a unique number called UNICORE. While one can still approach the court, there are a few provisions that could absolve them of responsibility,” he says.
Srinivas also states that in this particular case of the Housing portal, it is not the details of beneficiaries of the scheme alone, but the details of all the citizens who participated in the survey.
“When we ask for the personal details of public figures like politicians, it is for transparency to ensure that no corruption takes place. However, we can’t expect the same from every citizen of the state,” Srinivas says.