In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, April 6, 2018

13207 - UIDAI revokes e-KYC, authentication services for some fintech companies - TNN


Rachel Chitra and Digbijay Mishra | TNN | Apr 5, 2018, 09:00 IST

In a move that seems to have left fintech players scrambling, Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), on Tuesday revoked their access to a dozen agencies that provide e-KYC verification and authentication services. Some of these agencies -- KUAs (e-KYC user agencies) and AUAs (authorized user agencies) -- will no longer be able to provide e-KYC verification to onboard new customers or authenticate financial transactions affecting e-wallets, online lenders, NFBCs and smaller fintech players.

Many fintech players are not AUAs or KUAs themselves but sub-KUAs and sub-AUAs , routing their requests through UIDAI's network.The recent development will affect these companies, particularly e-commerce players and peer-to-peer lending platforms, which operate on a completely online model.

They will now have to change their mode of doing business and incur higher costs to physically verify the credentials of their customers.

"This is detrimental to fintech companies which rely on e-KYC for user verification and on-boarding. A physical KYC costs about Rs 100 per person while the same is roughly Rs 15 when it is done vi e-KYC. The problem started since yesterday and we are talking to all stakeholders to regarding this major problem," Jitendra Gupta, MD f digital payments company PayU India, told TOI.

PayU which has a pay later service called LazyPay on an average on-boards about 40,000-50,000 users every day and conducting physical KYC for them would be a costly affair.

Even players like payments bank Paytm, Airtel and Jio were unaffected; as is the case with some wallets like Mobikwik but three other players said their access has been revoked, but did not wish to comment.

UIDAI did not respond to a request for a comment. But UIDAI officials said they are yet to understand the situation and certain approvals might have been revoked after a CERT-In empanelled IT security audit. An earlier security audit in September 2017, saw UIDAI blacklisting 49,000 enrollment centres.

UIDAI's current list of 255 KUAs, include top banks like State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, ICICI Bank, while its list of 310 AUAs, include players like Aircel, AIIMS, CDSL, CIBIL, among others. Many banks, including SBI, PNB, act as both AUAs (for financial authentication) and KUAs (for e-KYC verification).

On PayU's Gupta's tweet, "Aadhar stopped all KUA and sub KUA to do validations!! Suddenly, all fintech businesses banking on Aadhar left scrambling!! India stack story will crumble very soon if it continues in this manner. @India_Stack @NandanNilekani @UIDAI." Gupta later clarified he meant AUA and not KUA. A UIDAI official responded, "It is an exaggeration to say access has been revoked to all KUAs. Some KUAs might have been barred post-audit for various reasons, lack of compliance, technical lethargy, etc." 

For some players like KrazyBee, their access was revoked much earlier. "In December itself, the KUA we tied-up with lost its license to operate. Since January, we have had to do physical verification or get e-signatures from our customers," said Madhusudan, CEO, KrazyBee.

"We feel the older method of e-KYC verification was more fraud-proof. With e-signatures there is a higher possibility of people forging documents before uploading it online. We've had to make our processes more stringent after we were forced to move to this," Madhusudan said.

A chief digital officer at a private bank said UIDAI's actions against KUAs are based on reports that they were storing customers' data on their devices and attempting to create parallel databases by industry-wide collaboration on the dark web.


"Finte-tech startups have largely built their businesses on the back of eKYC compared to large banks, NBFCs among others. The API access might be given back again in a week or so but that would mean significant loss of business for these companies," said founder of a company which helps several startups in e-KYC for on-boarding users.