In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, July 29, 2018

13802 - HC seeks Centre’s response on plea to use Aadhaar details of missing persons - One India

HC seeks Centre’s response on plea to use Aadhaar details of missing persons
Posted By: Oneindia Staff Writer
Published: Saturday, July 28, 2018, 11:21 [IST]


New Delhi, July 28: The Delhi High Court has sought the Centre's response on a PIL seeking direction to utilise biometric and Aadhaar details of missing persons, including children, aged and mentally challenged, so that they can be re-united with their families.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and C Hari Shankar issued notice to the Ministry of Home Affairs on the plea which also sought direction to the authorities to spread awareness in this regard to track the pre-existed biometrics and Aadhaar details for re-uniting missing persons with their families across country.

The bench asked the ministry to file an action taken report on the representation made by petitioner advocate Amit Sahni to the authorities and listed the matter for further hearing on November 13.

The petition said the Centre be directed to issue appropriate and mandatory directions to the authorities for utilising biometric/Aadhaar of missing children, old aged persons and mentally challenged persons immediately for the purpose of tracing and re-uniting them with their families as and when they are rescued by any department.

It said the petitioner was not challenging any question of law, which is already pending adjudication before the Supreme Court, that is, the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.
"There have been many debates regarding Aadhaar and the issue of its constitutional validity is pending before the Supreme Court of India but the same is very useful for tracing missing persons, if the Aadhaar of such missing persons is pre-existed," it said.

The plea referred to the statistics of National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) 2016 as per which the total missing persons are 5,49,008 and untraced ones are 3,19,627 .

"There is no greater vacuum or void than the helplessness felt by parents whose children have gone missing and the significance of timely recovering of the missing child can only be understood if one empathies with feelings of the missing child or that of a mother, who is unable to locate her child irrespective of the circumstances under which a child goes missing," it said.

Sahni also referred to a judicial order in which by the intervention of a trial court, a 31-year-old mentally challenged woman was re-united with her family in Rajasthan through Aadhaar.

In that case, a mentally challenged woman was rescued by Delhi Police and produced before Metropolitan Magistrate Abhilash Malhotra, who directed the authorities to help the victim to undergo the process of Aadhaar, which revealed that her biometric records pre-existed in the Aadhaar database.

The police obtained her details from the Unique Identification Authority of India after which she the woman was re-united with her family.
CLICK ON TITLE TO SEE ORIGINAL ARTICLE - Posted by

13801 - TRAI Chief Makes His Aadhaar Public After Dare, Twitter Responds With His PAN, Phone Number - News 18

TRAI Chief Makes His Aadhaar Public After Dare, Twitter Responds With His PAN, Phone Number

The incident had netizens divided. While some felt that the exchange would help bring to the fore the concerns regarding Aadhaar, others felt RS Sharma was proved right as the disclosed information was already in the public domain.

Updated:July 29, 2018, 2:01 PM IST
facebookTwittergoogleskype
Unmute
Current Time0:01
/
Duration Time0:52
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
 
TRAI Chief Makes His Aadhaar Public After Dare, Twitter Responds With His PAN, Phone Number
New Delhi: When Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) chief RS Sharma dared Twitterati to “do him harm” based on his Aadhaar number, little did he know that his move would backfire.

Sharma, who is of the opinion that Aadhaar does not violate privacy, told The Print in an interview on Saturday that he had no qualms about making his 12-digit unique identity number public.
“Tell me what harm can you do to me if you have my Aadhaar details? I will give you my Aadhaar number if you like,” Sharma, whose tenure ends on August 9, told the website.

However, soon after his statement, a Twitter user dared him to “walk the talk” and reveal his number.

Not one to duck in the face of a challenge, Sharma took to the microblogging site to make his number public. He also asked the user to “show me one concrete example where you can do any harm to me!”, much to the amusement of netizens. 



But this was just the tip of the iceberg.

Soon, Twitter users took it upon themselves to prove to the TRAI chief that there were loopholes in the system that needed to be plugged.

A user named Elliot Alderson, who described himself as a French security researcher, posted Sharma’s phone number, email address and PAN and a picture of the TRAI chief with a woman relative without revealing her identity. 

He was also quick to add that Sharma's bank account was not linked to Aadhaar, to which the TRAI chief responded: "Looks like you are not as good as you claim to be! All my bank accounts are linked to Aadhaar. Further, even if you know my bank account number, so what!" 

Alderson then said he would “stop here” and asked Sharma if he understood why making his Aadhaar number public “is not a good idea”.

Aadhar_Story

He added that he was "not against Aadhaar, but only against people who think Aadhaar is unhackable".

The exchange, however, had Tweeple divided.

While some users felt that the incident would help bring to the fore the concerns regarding Aadhaar, others felt that Sharma was proved right as the information disclosed by Alderson was already in the public domain and did not really “do any harm”.







When contacted by PTI, Sharma declined to make a detailed comment on the matter, saying "let the challenge run for some time".

Sharma is believed to be in the running to head the new data protection authority to be instituted in line with the recommendations made by the regulator in its paper on data protection and privacy.

When the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) was set up in 2009, the former civil servant was selected as its first director-general. He has subsequently been a vocal proponent of UIDAI's security infrastructure.

However, multiple petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of such a database, and how making biometric enrollment mandatory was a violation of an individual's privacy. The SC reserved its verdict following the conclusion of hearings in May.

The Justice Srikrishna Committee, in its report published on July 27, recommended that the Aadhaar Act be amended "significantly" to bolster privacy safeguards. It also observed that only government departments or authorities that have secured the approval of the UIDAI can request Aadhaar details for rendering services. The committee is also in favour of giving greater autonomy to the UIDAI so that it operates independently of the government.

The Srikrishna Committee's report is part of the government’s larger attempt at framing a draft Personal Data Protection Bill that will set the guidelines for the collection and storage of sensitive personal information.
CLICK ON TITLE TO SEE ORIGINAL ARTICLE - Posted by
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)