In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label Live Mint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Live Mint. Show all posts

Thursday, November 14, 2013

4930 - Government responds to UIDAI criticism - Live Mint


Opinion of ministry and attorney general was the basis for issuing Aadhaar numbers before a law backing it was passed




The official comment came was in response to criticism that the UIDAI was issuing the Aadhaar numbers on the basis of only an executive order and not a law. Photo: Ramesh Pathania/Mint


New Delhi: The opinion of the law ministry and the attorney general was the basis for issuing Aadhaar unique identity numbers before a law backing it was passed, a government release said on Thursday.

The official comment came was in response to criticism that the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) was issuing the unique identity numbers on the basis of only an executive order and not a law.

The release, titled National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2013, to be introduced in winter session of Parliament, responds to this and other criticisms of the parliamentary standing committee on finance. The Bill was referred to the House panel headed by opposition leader Yashwant Sinha after it was introduced on 3 December 2010 in the upper House.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

4816 - Aadhaar should not be made mandatory: Aruna Roy - Live Mint


Roy says the government should work toward allaying shortcomings in the National Food Security Act


First Published: Fri, Oct 11 2013. 07 52 PM IST

Social activist Aruna Roy. Photo: Ramesh Pathania/Mint

Jaipur: Social activist Aruna Roy on Friday termed the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government’s Aadhaar project as an “illegal document,” demanding that it should not be made mandatory to avail basic services.

The government should work toward allaying shortcomings in the National Food Security Act, she told reporters.

Roy claimed that following the implementation of the Act several families which were receiving food grains are now getting lesser than the original quantity.

The Act only covers basic staples (wheat and rice), and not pulses and oil that are basic ingredients of a meal in a poor household, Roy, who is the president of National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW), said.

Claiming that the protest against the implementation of Aadhaar scheme was gaining momentum, NFIW’s general secretary Annie Raja said that its implementation is not right.

Demanding the passage of the women’s reservation Bill in the forthcoming session of Parliament, Roy questioned the laxity in the passage of the Bill when women were already getting a 50% reservation at panchayat-level.

The federation also threatened to sit on a ‘dharna’ in front of the Parliament on 25 November to press for their demands. PTI

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

4744 - Jayalalithaa urges PM to hold phase two roll-out of direct cash transfer for LPG - Live Mint

Tamil Nadu CM says replacing the subsidy with a direct cash transfer is not appropriate


Chennai: Tamil Nadu chief minister J. Jayalalithaa has urged Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to re-think the roll-out of the second phase of its direct cash transfer scheme for cooking gas cylinders, known as direct benefit transfer for LPG (DBTL).

In a letter to Singh, the Tamil Nadu chief minister said she was “rudely shocked” to receive a letter from the oil minister informing her of the second phase of the scheme.

The programme is proposed to be implemented in 235 districts across the country, including 25 districts in Tamil Nadu, from 1 January.

“I would like to place on record my strong opposition to the proposed roll-out of direct benefit transfer for LPG,” she said, adding that replacing the subsidy with a direct cash transfer is not appropriate.

Jayalalithaa had already conveyed her opposition to direct cash transfers to beneficiaries’ bank accounts by the central government, saying it was wrong administrative practice to bypass state governments.

Further, she said linking DBTL with Aadhaar identity numbers will only lead to confusion and public inconvenience as the system is not yet fully geared for it. In Tamil Nadu, of the eligible 67.4 million people, Aadhaar numbers have been issued to only 25.2 million.

The DBTL scheme has so far been introduced in 54 districts, covering 21.9 million out of India’s total of about 140 million consumers of subsidized cooking gas cylinders.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

4663 - Supreme Court shock for UPA’s Aadhaar-linked cash transfers - Live Mint


Top court says Aadhaar can’t be mandatory for availing benefits; interim order may foil UPA’s poll trump card

First Published: Mon, Sep 23 2013. 09 36 PM IST

The Aadhaar scheme was designed to provide every resident in India with a unique identity number. Photo: Ramesh Pathania/ Mint

Updated: Tue, Sep 24 2013. 02 17 PM IST
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday, in an interim order, said the government cannot make Aadhaar numbers mandatory for availing the benefits of government services and subsidies, including the direct benefit transfer (DBT) scheme for cooking gas.

The move could potentially crimp the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance’s (UPA) plans to use the direct transfer of benefits as a talking point in the upcoming general election; it had even coined a catchy slogan to do so—Apkaa paisa aapke haath (your money in your hands).

Launched on 1 January, the direct benefits transfer programme has expanded to 28 schemes in 121 districts.

The court has also restrained the government from issuing Aadhaar numbers to illegal immigrants. The Aadhaar scheme was designed to provide every resident in India with a unique identity number and did not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens.

The interim order was passed by a two-judge bench, headed by justice B.S. Chauhan, that was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the issuance of Aadhaar numbers on grounds of invasion of privacy and right to life, according to advocate Anish Kumar Gupta who is representing the petitioners— former Karnataka high court judge K. S. Puttuswamy and advocate Parvesh Khanna.

Mint has not reviewed a copy of the interim order.

“The court says that Aadhaar can’t be made mandatory for providing services, (and) this is so far the government’s stand as well. Aadhaar can’t be a criteria for excluding people when it comes to services such as registration or protection. This may not hold for subsidies,” said a senior government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. This person added that he is yet to see and understand the complete order.


News agency Press Trust of India reported that the Union government told the Supreme Court that securing Aadhaar numbers was optional and it had not made it mandatory for citizens.

A senior official at the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) said, “One can only comment when we have seen the order, but in general terms, the UIDAI is in agreement that the enrolment for Aadhaar is voluntary and its application should be accompanied with robust exception management which has been the government’s stand as well.”

Exception management refers to providing services or benefits through alternative systems for those who do not have Aadhaar numbers.

“The court said that possession of Aadhaar numbers is not compulsory for availing government-sponsored beneficial schemes and services. The bench issued a set of interim directions today and the matter will come up for hearing at a later date. These orders will operate till a final decision is arrived at by the court,” said Gupta.

The Aadhaar or Unique Identity Number, issued by the UIDAI under the aegis of the Planning Commission, is a 12-digit identification number which serves as proof of identity and address anywhere in India.

The apex court also heard a batch of pleas against decisions of some states to make Aadhaar numbers compulsory for a range of activities including salary, provident fund disbursals and marriage and property registration.

The Aadhaar-based DBT scheme aimed at transfer of welfare payments to the bank accounts of beneficiaries, with the unique identity number acting as the link between the government department’s beneficiary database and the beneficiary’s bank account.

However, official review meetings of DBT have found that linking of beneficiaries’ bank accounts to their Aadhaar numbers has been a drag on its faster implementation.

While S. Sundareshan, mission director for DBT, declined comment, stating he was not authorized to speak on Aadhaar, a petroleum ministry official requesting anonymity said: “If there will be some problem, it will be taken up at the appropriate level for relief.” This person added that it was impossible to target cooking gas subsidies without Aadhaar-linked bank accounts.

Despite the call for fresh legislation supporting the issuance of Aadhaar numbers from the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance in consecutive reports since December 2011—the latest one was tabled in April—the government has not created an enabling law. Instead, it has proceeded to link it in phases with transfer of welfare payments such as cooking gas, scholarships and pensions.

The finance ministry said in Parliament on 16 August that only 9.62% of beneficiary accounts for schemes under the programme, other than cooking gas subsidy, were linked to Aadhaar. The figure was about 50% for liquified petroleum gas subsidy transfer, much behind Aadhaar coverage of about 75% in the 20 districts where the targeted cooking gas scheme began on 1 June.

Utpal Bhaskar contributed to this story.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

1168 - Aadhaar sets stage for cash transfers by Surabhi Agarwal - Source Live Mint

Posted: Thu, Mar 3 2011. 1:00 AM IST
 Surabhi Agarwal, surabhi.a@livemint.com

In line with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee’s budget announcement on Monday that the government is looking at direct cash transfers as an alternative to the current subsidy on kerosene and fertilizers and to prevent leakages, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is planning to open Aadhaar-linked bank accounts for the purpose. These can be used for other financial transactions as well.

The authority is in the process of empanelling banks that will open “no-frills accounts” or link existing ones, during enrolments for Aadhaar, as the unique ID programme is called. So far, UIDAI has enrolled around three million people and around 80% of them seek bank accounts.

UIDAI’s tender document states that the bank opening the account should have the capability to “provide electronic interface to facilitate disbursal of government benefits... Government may provide a list of Aadhaar numbers and amounts to the bank, and bank should be capable of routing payments to the linked bank account through an interoperable network”.

While the banks will be empanelled by April, the accounts are likely to be opened by May. UIDAI chairman Nandan Nilekani also heads a task force that’s working out the modalities for the proposed direct transfer of subsidy for kerosene and fertilizers, apart from liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

The government subsidizes the price of the fuels and fertilizers in order to make them affordable to consumers. The government wants to plug leakages to ensure that the money reaches those that need it the most.

“To ensure greater efficiency, cost effectiveness and better delivery for both kerosene and fertilizers, the government will move towards direct transfer of cash subsidy to people living below poverty line in a phased manner,” Mukherjee said in his budget speech.

The report of the Nilekani task force is expected by June, while the system is expected to be in place by March 2012.

“Currently, there is no mechanism for direct transfers for social welfare schemes,” said A.P. Singh, deputy director general at UIDAI. “Aadhaar-linked bank accounts will create that infrastructure.”

The task force, which held its first meeting recently, is considering several options, including direct cash transfers to the account of the beneficiary, who buys the product at market price. Another option is to pay the merchant, who then sells at the subsidized rate to the beneficiary. “The task force is yet to formalize which way is more feasible,” said an official familiar with the discussions.

While a bank account is a key part of these options, a large part of India’s population is unbanked (60% according to Reserve Bank of India, or RBI data) and penetration in the rural areas is very low. Given the current rate of UIDAI enrolment and demand for bank accounts, there could be as many as five million new bank accounts in the country in April.

“Banks will have to open accounts for transferring the subsidies,” said M.V. Nair, chairman and managing director of Union Bank of India.

Indian Overseas Bank chairman and managing director M. Narendra said the process will mean more customers for banks and a larger base to cross-sell financial products to the rural population at a lower cost of customer acquisition.

Mukherjee said in his budget speech that UIDAI is expecting to generate around one million numbers from October. The authority has a target of enrolling 600 million people by 2014.

As per the tender document, UIDAI will empanel a set of banks in each area. People can choose which bank they want to open an account with when they’re being enrolled. Details of residents will be sent electronically to that bank, which will have to open an account within 30 days.

UIDAI has kept the selection criteria for banks at a bare minimum—it should be a scheduled bank and have at least one core banking-enabled branch in the district it seeks empanelment in.

Wherever enrolment is being undertaken in villages “adopted” by banks as part of the financial inclusion plan of RBI, the resident can choose between such lenders or the post office savings bank.

Under the financial inclusion initiative, the government had last year asked banks to provide facilities to areas having a population of over 2,000 by March 2012. The government had identified 73,000 such habitations. Banks expect to provide banking facilities to 20,000 villages this year and the remaining in 2011-12.

Where a bank is the registrar and conducting Aadhaar enrolment, accounts will be opened in that bank, unless it falls in areas where another lender has been appointed by RBI as the lead bank. In other cases, the customer will get a choice from the empanelled list. The bank will also set up at least one customer service point for every 2,000 accounts opened by it in a district, if this doesn’t already exist.

UIDAI is already conducting a pilot for the disbursement of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme funds in Jharkhand with Union Bank, ICICI Bank Ltd and Bank of India, where micro-ATMs will be deployed for payments. Meanwhile, the task force is considering a technology platform on which separate accounts for kerosene, LPG and fertilizers or subsequently other subsidies could be created for individual beneficiaries, tracking how much of the entitlement has been availed of.

“Separate accounts for entitlements such as kerosene, fertilizer, LPG can be maintained,” Nilekani said at a recent seminar in Delhi. “It will re-engineer the public sector delivery model by dealing with the underlining plumbing to prevent leakages in the social welfare schemes.”

Remya Nair contributed to this story.