In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label New Indian Express. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Indian Express. Show all posts

Saturday, October 19, 2013

4849 - Plea against making Aadhaar card mandatory - New Indian Express

By Express News Service - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Published: 16th October 2013 10:52 AM
Last Updated: 16th October 2013 10:52 AM

Kerala Construction Workers’ Trade Union Joint Action Council has called upon the  Kerala Construction Workers’ Welfare Board to  withdraw from the move to make Aadhaar card mandatory for the disbursal of the welfare pension. 

Action council state convener S Venurajan, vice-chairmen Changa Vijayan, Manu Joseph,  district convener G K Stelter and district   chairman K Soman told a news conference that  the move to make registering bank accounts  with the Akshaya Kendra mandatory would not help the retired workers who draw a paltry sum as pension.

They pointed out that even the Supreme Court had made it clear that Aadhaar card should not be made manadatory for claiming welfare pension and other benefits from the government.


Raising various demands such as minimum pension worth Rs 2,000,  disbursal of pension through money order for aged, the Joint Action Council will  take out a march and stage a dharna in front  of the ‘Thozhil Bhavan’ near PMG Junction  here on October 18.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

4792 - 'Aadhaar cannot be mandatory' - Usha Ramanathan - New Indian Express

By Express News Service - BANGALORE
Published: 08th October 2013 07:59 AM
Last Updated: 08th October 2013 07:59 AM

Usha Ramanathan, an independent law researcher, who works on jurisprudence of law, poverty  and rights said Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for any government schemes after the recent observations by the apex court.

Delivering a talk on Aadhaar here on Monday, Usha said, after the Supreme Court’s observations, the Centre had stated that unique identification card will not be compulsory, but the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas still insists that people provide the number to get LPG cylinders.

When the National Population Registry was about to come out with a more efficient system, the unique identification card project was started, she said. 
It invades into the privacy of individuals, she observed.


“The unique identification card could have remained as a back-up for National Population Registry, but the authority seems to show less commitment,” she added.

Monday, October 7, 2013

4760 - LPG subsidy: Aadhaar holders taken for a ride - Mathew Thomas - New Indian Express

LPG subsidy: Aadhaar holders taken for a ride
By Mathew A Thomas | ENS - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Published: 03rd October 2013 09:25 AM
Last Updated: 03rd October 2013 04:25 Pm

Till the Aadhaar issue cropped up, a VAT amount of Rs 20 was being deducted from consumers at the door delivery of cylinders. File photo 

Those who have been over-enthusiastic  to follow the government directive to link Aadhaar cards with their bank accounts to avail subsidies for LPG cylinders and other benefits are now ruing their decision.

For, even if the LPG subsidy amount was debited from their accounts, going by the prices of last month, an additional amount of  Rs 26.65 was deducted from it against VAT.

With the non-subsidised LPG price going up by Rs 50 per cylinder from October 1, the value-added tax coming to the coffers of the state rose to another Rs 5 per cylinder.

In the case of LPG consumers who are yet to opt for Aadhaar linkage, they had paid only around Rs 445 per cylinder in September. It will remain the same this month also. But those with Aadhaar-linked bank accounts, the price was around Rs 945 last month. At the time of booking itself, a subsidy component of Rs 435 was credited in the bank account of such consumers. In the remaining second subsidy component of Rs 109, the deduction of VAT tax was effected.
The cost of one cylinder in the second category has increased by Rs 50 from Tuesday, to hit the Rs 1,000 mark.

The state government has gained immensely from the VAT tax collection, though only less than one-fourth of the total Indane LPG consumers in the state is estimated to have linked their Aadhaar cards with bank accounts.

“It is estimated that the state consumes around 1.25 lakh cylinders a day.

Out of it, subsidies of roughly 25,000 cylinders might have been linked to bank accounts so far,” pointed out M Sangeeth Kumar, general secretary, All-India LPG Distributors Federation, Kerala Circle.

Till the Aadhaar issue cropped up, a VAT amount of Rs 20 was being deducted from consumers at the door delivery of cylinders.

The rest of the total 20 per cent VAT amount due to the state government was debited by oil companies directly from subsidies offered by the Centre.


It is this additional amount which is being collected from Aadhaar-linked consumers now.

Monday, September 30, 2013

4722 - Aadhar cut down to size, data mining projects raise concerns - New Indian Express

Aadhar cut down to size, data mining projects raise concerns
By Yatish Yadav - NEW DELHI
Published: 29th Sep 2013 09:31:33 AM

After the Supreme Court ruling that the Aadhaar card issued by Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is not mandatory to receive essential government services, the fate of UPA government’s other ‘data mining’ projects through National Information Utilities (NIUs) hangs in balance.

It is no surprise that the recommendation to set up NIUs for five projects—Goods and Services Tax, Tax Information Network, Expenditure Information Network, National Treasury Management Agency and New Pension System to collect and store taxpayer’s data with private companies for centralised tax collection and registration came from a committee, Technology Advisory Group for Unique Projects (TAG-UP), headed by UIDAI chairman Nandan Nilekani. These NIUs will be constituted as private companies with taxpayer’s money. Surprisingly, they will not only collect and store your personal information but also levy user charges if you want to avail its services in future.

The committee in 2011 had recommended that private ownership within NIUs should be at least 51 per cent and government—Centre and state’s—role would become that of a paying customer with each having 24.5 per cent ownership in the company.

According to a secret cabinet note, government has already approved Rs 315 crore to set up just one company to collect Goods and Services Tax data. The move was opposed by the Department of Expenditure saying it would be wrong if controlling stake of 51 per cent is held by private companies without any substantial investment.

The government was told by the Nilekani-headed TAG-UP committee that decentralisation of government function by introducing such information technology projects will bring efficiency in governance and it will increase tax collection. The objection of DoE was overruled by the UPA government justifying the arrangement for a larger goal of bringing independence, flexibility and professional environment through private companies.

According to the plan, entire individual data—direct and indirect taxes—including registration, return and payment by taxpayers will be in custody of private company that will operate from Delhi and Mumbai. Independent law researcher Usha Ramnathan said turning public data into a private entity is a serious issue connected with the privacy of individual.  “It is a complete highway robbery. In fact, UIDAI was model to establish NIUs where all government data should be handed over to private companies. If you hand over the complete data of public without creating a capacity within the government, the entire system would collapse if tomorrow court rules against it,” said Ramanathan.

With the creation of NIUs, these projects will ensure that entire population, even non-taxpayers or those exempted from paying taxes by the government are carefully tagged like UIDAI.  The secret cabinet note reveals that in some states where tribal population is exempted from tax, an idea of issuing dummy PAN card was suggested to mark the entire state population.

“The representative of Sikkim indicated that in Sikkim no income tax is payable for Scheduled Tribe and therefore they do not have PAN numbers. It was clarified by Dr Nandan Nilekani that for Sikkim and some other north-eastern states dummy PAN numbers can be issued,” note said.  

Gopal Krishna of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties said all the projects related to UIDAI which were launched to collect and store personal data raises serious security concerns as they are untested, unreliable and based on unsafe technology.

“All the committee reports headed by Nandan Nilekani will be adversely affected by SC order. The UIDAI intention of making it mandatory was exposed as they cannot by force collect biometric of an individual. This tagging of people and handing over public data to private company is a dangerous trend which was even abandoned by the developed nations including US and UK,” Krishna said.

However, a government official on the condition of anonymity said issues of privacy and security concerns about private companies are unfounded as government will have strategic control of the NIUs through special resolution and composition of board. 


“It will have a robust IT infrastructure and security system to protect the information,” the official said.

4698 - Government must scrap dubious UID scheme - New Indian Express


Government must scrap dubious UID scheme

By The New Indian Express Published: 24th September 2013 07:24 AM Last Updated: 24th September 2013 07:24 AM

In what could prove to be a major embarrassment to prime minister Manmohan Singh and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, the Supreme Court on Monday put a big question mark over the ruling coalition’s touted flagship scheme launched under the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). Admitting a public interest litigation challenging the legality of the Aadhaar cards issued by the UIDAI, it said, “The Centre and state governments must not insist on Aadhaar cards from citizens before providing them essential services.” At a time when the Congress-led central and state governments are busy linking multiple public services to the Aadhaar number, the ruling is bound to put a damper on the party’s plan to turn Aadhaar-linked cash transfers for services into a vote-catching device.

The ruling is particularly welcome as it tends to endorse serious objections to the legality of the scheme raised by experts to the parliamentary standing committee on finance. The committee, which looked at the National Identification Authority Bill introduced in the Rajya Sabha, had regretted that despite serious differences of opinion within the government on the Aadhaar scheme, it “continues to be implemented in an overbearing manner without regard to legalities”.


The court’s directive that the government should not issue Aadhaar cards to illegal immigrants underlines the apprehensions expressed by the home minister that it could also have sinister implications for national security. The UPA government should not allow electoral imperatives to ignore the patent illegality of the scheme that forces people to part with sensitive private information such as biometric data or finger-prints without having any law to protect their rights. As the parliamentary panel has recommended, the government should scrap the scheme, which is a drain on the exchequer. Instead, cards issued under the National Population Register should be made the only legal identity card for government schemes and transactions

Sunday, September 29, 2013

4667 - Government must scrap dubious UID scheme - New Indian Express

By The New Indian Express
Published: 24th September 2013 07:24 AM
Last Updated: 24th September 2013 07:24 AM

In what could prove to be a major embarrassment to prime minister Manmohan Singh and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, the Supreme Court on Monday put a big question mark over the ruling coalition’s touted flagship scheme launched under the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). Admitting a public interest litigation challenging the legality of the Aadhaar cards issued by the UIDAI, it said, “The Centre and state governments must not insist on Aadhaar cards from citizens before providing them essential services.” At a time when the Congress-led central and state governments are busy linking multiple public services to the Aadhaar number, the ruling is bound to put a damper on the party’s plan to turn Aadhaar-linked cash transfers for services into a vote-catching device.

The ruling is particularly welcome as it tends to endorse serious objections to the legality of the scheme raised by experts as the parliamentary standing committee on finance. The committee, which looked at the National Identification Authority Bill introduced in the Rajya Sabha, had regretted that despite serious differences of opinion within the government on the Aadhaar scheme, it “continues to be implemented in an overbearing manner without regard to legalities”.


The court’s directive that the government should not issue Aadhaar cards to illegal immigrants underlines the apprehensions expressed by the home minister that it could also have sinister implications for national security. The UPA government should not allow electoral imperatives to ignore the patent illegality of the scheme that forces people to part with sensitive private information such as biometric data or finger-prints without having any law to protect their rights. As the parliamentary panel has recommended, the government should scrap the scheme, which is a drain on the exchequer. Instead, cards issued under the National Population Register should be made the only legal identity card for government schemes and transactions.