Why this Blog ? News articles in the Wide World of Web, quite often disappear with time, when they are relocated as archives with a different url. Archives in this blog serve as a library for those who are interested in doing Research on Aadhaar Related Topics. Articles are published with details of original publication date and the url.
Aadhaar
The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018
When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi
“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.
Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.
Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha
“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh
But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP
“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.
August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"
“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.
Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.
Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.
UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy
1) Denial
2) Issue fiats and point finger
3) Shoot messenger
4) Bury head in sand.
God Save India
Monday, December 1, 2014
7002 - Niti Commission likely to be new plan panel - Hindustan Times
Sunday, November 30, 2014
6085 - Inter-state council, planning and monitoring division & UIDAI to merge to replace plan panel - Economic Times
Sunday, September 7, 2014
5843 - 60% of plan panel staff to be posted in ministries - Hindustan Times
IEO’s director general Ajay Chibber was sacked last Friday and the remaining staff in the organisation will have to go back to their parent departments, sources said, adding that the few consultants hired would be provided an option to work with different departments.
Saturday, September 6, 2014
5832 - Government decides the structure of the new entity that will replace Planning Commission - Economic Times
Monday, July 29, 2013
4439 - Rs 27 per day: India's new rural poverty line
Sunday, June 10, 2012
2607 - ‘RGI data enough for Aadhaar’ - Deccan Herald
The Cabinet on Thursday decided that the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) shall issue Aadhar or unique ID numbers (UID) to citizens based on the biometric data generated by the Registrar General of India (RGI).
To avoid duplication and other glitches, Chidambaram wanted the UIDAI to use the biometric data from RGI, which UIDAI had opposed.
Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee too wrote to the chief ministers of 16 states and union territories on Thursday regarding the rollout of Aadhaar-enabled payments to beneficiaries of various Central Government Schemes.
Aadhaar platform is now ready to support payments under various schemes directly to the beneficiaries’ accounts in select areas, Mukherjee said.
Chidambaram had said that the National Population Register (NPR) project of RGI was “almost at a standstill” due to UIDAI’s disregard for its data.
Nilekani, who came to North Block to meet Chidambaram, refused to comment on the government’s decision. “I have come to meet [him] on a personal issue. I don’t want to comment on his letter,” he said.
"The collection of photographs and biometrics has been facing hurdles at every step on account of the approach of the UIDAI, which, it seems, has failed to appreciate the core purpose of the NPR," Chidambaram had complained in his letter.
He also criticised the UIDAI for showing scant regard to the Cabinet order. "Despite orders from the cabinet, the UIDAI is objecting to the conduct of NPR camps in certain states and is also refusing to accept the biometric data of NPR for de-duplication and generation of Aadhaar numbers," he said.
At loggerheads
The Planning Commission, under which comes UIDAI, and the Home Ministry have been at loggerheads since the government decided to give Aadhaar numbers to citizens. Earlier too, Chidambaram had complained to PM in writing on the non-cooperative attitude of UIDAI. It was only after PM’s intervention did the Planning Commission and UIDAI agree to take RGI data. Chidambaram said he had taken up the issue with Nilekani, while Home Secretary.
Monday, March 12, 2012
2421- Rs 300 Crore Aadhaar Contract for Reliance-HCL consortium - e Gov
Telecom services provider Reliance Communications (RCom), in a consortium led by IT firm HCL Infosystems, is believed to have bagged the Rs 300 crore network and subscriber contract for government’s national identity card programme, Aadhaar.
According to sources, Anil Ambani-led RCom has won the number repository and IT infrastructure contract for Aadhaar as part of a consortium led by HCL Infosystems.
Value of the contract carried out by RCom is expected to be in the range of Rs 200 crore to Rs 300 crore, sources said. RCom will provide network and telecom support for Aadhar, they added.
Unique identification project, Aadhar, was initially conceived by the Planning Commission as an initiative to provide identification for each resident across the country and use it as a basis for efficient delivery of welfare services.
The UID number is also envisaged to act as a tool for effective monitoring of various programs and schemes of the Government.
The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) would start enrolling 40 crore people for issuance of Aadhaar numbers in April, its Chairman Nandan M Nilekani said last week.
“We will restart enrollment of about 40 crore in April”, he told reporters in response to questions. “We will do (enrollment of) about two crore a month”. UIDAI has enrolled 20 crore people so far, of which 13.5 crore have already been issued Aadhaar numbers, while the process is on to clear the backlog vis-a-vis the remaining 6.5 crore people
Friday, November 25, 2011
2006 - 'Process for handling of Aadhar files by PlanComm streamlined' - Hindustan Times
In a written reply to the Lok Sabha, minister of state for planning Ashwani Kumar said the plan panel had taken up the issue of streamlining of processes for handling of files from the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) - which oversees the smart ID card project - in the Planning Commission with the department of expenditure.
The UIDAI is an attached office of the Planning Commission.
"The Planning Commission had also pointed out that the financial adviser in the UIDAI has been assigned several administrative responsibilities along with her function as financial adviser," Kumar said.
He added that the Plan panel had indicated that such an arrangement would take away the benefit of an independent scrutiny of proposals involving the use of public funds by an "arm's length" financial adviser.
"These matters have been resolved and processes have been streamlined as per the existing government procedures," Kumar said.
The minister said that an expenditure of Rs 3,170.32 crore has been approved under the first two phases of the UIDAI's 'Aadhaar' unique identification card scheme by the Expenditure Finance Committee.
The second phase of the project is slated to conclude this fiscal and the third phase will start from 2012-13.
"The Expenditure Finance Committee has recommended Rs 8,814.75 crore for Phase-III... The proposal would be brought before the Cabinet Committee on UIDAI in due course," Kumar said.
In reply to another question in the Lok Sabha, the minister said enrollment under the UIDAI is on track as per targets and 6.73 crore Aadhaar numbers were generated till November 15.
"At present, the UIDAI has set the target of 60 crore enrollments by 2014, out of which 20 crore enrollments are expected to be completed by March, 2012," Kumar said.
2005 - UID-home ministry dispute in PM's court - Hindustan Times
The plan panel has sent a detailed note to the Prime Minister's Office on why UIDAI is important for India because of its linkage with delivery of developmental schemes unlike home ministry's National Population Register (NPR) aimed at providing identity cards to residents.
In an over 100 page note, the panel had also said that Nandan Nilekani headed UIDAI enrolment process was inclusive and aims at bringing every resident under the unique identification or Aadhaar number regime.
"All residents may not get enrolled for Aadhaar if the National Population Register protocol is followed," a senior plan panel functionary said.
The NPR protocol stipulates receiving objections of those seeking enrolment and verification by local revenue department official. "Persons aggrieved by such order have a right of appeal to the Tehsildar and then to the District Collector," says the website of Census commissioner. Once this process is over, the lists will be placed in the Gram Sabha in villages and the Ward Committee in towns.
UIDAI adopts easier approach of issuing Aadhaar numbers to those who have any of the listed documents to prove identity or is introduced by a person already having an Aadhaar number.
Home minister P Chidambaram, who has also sent his comments on plan panel's note to the PMO earlier this month, had described the UIDAI process as internal security threat as it does not follow rigid enrolment protocol prescribed under the Citizens Act of 1955.
Plan panel deputy chairperson Montek Singh Ahluwalia do not agree with the contention and has asked Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to suggest changes in the law to provide statutory backing to UIDAI" enrolment process.
PM Singh had reportedly asked Ahluwalia and Chidambaram to have informal talks with each other on their differences over future of UIDAI.
The home ministry wants that after March 2012 only NPR should be allowed to enroll residents for an Aadhaar number and UIDAI should act as its backend office. Ahluwalia, however, wants both the organsiations to enroll in close coordination with each other.
The plan panel officials say the issue will be sorted out by the PM before the Union Cabinet takes a final call.
2004 - Plan panel: UID beneficiaries should pay for enrolments - Live Mint
Surabhi Agarwal & Sangeeta Singh
New Delhi: The Planning Commission has recommended that the unique identity (UID) programme’s beneficiaries such as public sector banks, insurance companies, state governments and welfare programmes pay for the enrolment of people since the benefits to them will outstrip the costs incurred.
The suggestion has been made in a note to the cabinet committee on UID project headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The issue is likely to be discussed in the cabinet meeting scheduled for Thursday
This is one of the four ways suggested by the Plan panel to arrive at a compromise between UID and the National Population Register (NPR) of the Registrar General of India (RGI), which have been locking horns over the issue of who will collect the biometric data of residents.
Currently, UIDAI has a grant that entitles it to collect biometrics of 200 million people after which NPR is supposed to take over. UIDAI has already registered around 120 million people in its system and expects to complete the rest in the next two-three months. On the other hand, considering that NPR has only enrolled around 7.5 million so far, the Planning Commission has approached the cabinet to take a call on the matter.
“I don’t think UIDAI should stop its work now that it has already crossed an important milestone. I also don’t think there’s an issue of NPR’s data being secure and UID’s being not reliable as both of the projects don’t give proof of citizenship in any case,” said the first official cited above.
This option of UIDAI continuing with its multi-registrar model of enrolment without funding (where other agencies pay for it) could ensure that the project is not stalled after it touches 200 million and will avoid duplication of government spending on both projects, which are on similar lines. The UID programme is also known as Aadhaar.
The second government official cited the method by which the income-tax Permanent Account Number (PAN) is assigned. The National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) has permission from the revenue department to charge a small fee for doing so.
Another proposal made in the note talks about NPR becoming the sole biometric collection agency in the country for any kind of government project. Currently, there are several states that are collecting biometrics for various projects across the country. The idea behind this suggestion is to ensure that biometrics collected by NPR are used by multiple agencies.
Another proposal reiterated a previous suggestion to share data between NPR and UID. RGI is opposed to this, doubting the authenticity of the biometrics collected by UIDAI.
“NPR has been given a process by the government; unless the process is changed, we are duty-bound to follow it,” said a government official close to the NPR project who did not want to be identified. NPR has much higher levels of security, he said. “We are very firm that any data which has not been authenticated will not be accepted in the NPR.”
Even though RGI and home minister P. Chidambaramhave repeatedly raised concerns about the reliability of UID data, they have specifically mandated in their tender document that biometric collection agencies “empanelled by Aadhaar” will qualify for NPR.
The fourth recommendation says that NPR should not collect biometrics as UID is already fulfilling the mandate. Former chief statistician of India and currently principal adviser to the Planning Commission, Pronab Sen, said, “The question is what is the division of labour between the two projects. The whole argument should not be about one-time registration of the people but about maintaining it as well in the future.”
surabhi.a@livemint.com
Sunday, November 13, 2011
1784 - Four options before Cabinet to resolve Aadhaar enrolment - Hindustan Times
Email Author
New Delhi, November 10, 2011
The ministrys Census commissioner had claimed that allowing UIDAI to collect biometric details would result in duplication of work as only it was authorized under the Citizenship Act of 1955 to collect the demographic information for creation of the National Population Register (NPR) of all residents.
The UIDAI had countered the claim saying that a Cabinet committee in 2008 had asked both organizations to work in coordination so that biometric details collected by either of them can be used by other.
The Census commissioner had refused to accept UIDAIs biometric data terming it unreliable in absence of verification of those enrolled. The NPR protocol details the process for verification through a public notice. The UIDAI enrolls residents on basis of prescribed documents and if introduced by a person having an Aadhaar number.
This issue remained unresolved at a meeting of a finance ministry committee, which restricted UIDAIs enrollment to 200 million people by March 2012, and left the final decision for the Cabinet.
Now, the plan panel has prepared a note for the Cabinets consideration with four options ---- amendment of the law to allow the commissioner and UIDAI to enroll, stop UIDAI from enrollment beyond 200 million, allow only commissioner to enroll and allow commissioner plus other government agencies such as banks to enroll.
But, the plan panel believes that allowing only the commissioner to enroll would delay linking government welfare schemes with unique identification (UID) or Aadhaar numbers.
The pace of enrolment of collection of bio-metric data by the Census commissioner has been very slow, a senior plan panel functionary told HT.
The government wants direct cash transfer of subsidies through Aadhaar based information technology platform for food, kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas by end of 2012. It also intends to link disbursement of wages under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme to Aadhaar linked bank accounts.
The government is already working on a set of recommendations made by Nilekani committee on Aadhaar-linked welfare measures to prevent leakages and to have bigger impact for socially and economically backward classes. Checking leakages will reduce the governments subsidy burden, a panel official said.
Top panel sources said panel deputy chairperson Montek Singh Ahluwalia wants to push for amendment of the citizenship law to fasten the enrolment process but is expected to face resistance from the Home Ministry, which does not want any tampering with the law.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/767431.aspx
© Copyright © 2011 HT Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
1683 - 'NREGA 2.0 seeks to make work a legal guarantee' - Mihir Shah, Planning Commission- Business Standard
The consortium of NGOs that recommended changes in the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) was founded by you, but your suggestions have been criticised. You seem to consider it a lack of demand rather than a supply problem.
First, you should recognise that NREGA is a historic break from the past, from the relief programme mode. Earlier, one got work when the government chose to make it available. NREGA seeks to make work a legal guarantee. But, even in the last five years under the Act, it was not demand-driven. It was still top down. The first change that should be brought about is capturing demand. There is no system to record demand. We have suggested multiple channels and agencies (all approved by the gram sabha) who would record demand and give dated receipts to job-seekers.
The committee is redrafting the rules and guidelines under NREGA, so that the entire system gears up to respond to demand. The insistence that states pay an unemployment allowance will also push them to respond.
The reforms under NREGA 2.0 will enable states to develop an adequate shelf of work, ensuring they respond effectively to demand. I do not fear there will be this kind of tokenism.
How would you help states gear up to demand?
The key to this is the labour budget exercise. At present, there is no predictability in either the timing or the quantum of work available in a village; nor are potential NREGA workers made aware of this. Unless we assure these, it is all futile. No one would come for work and people would continue to migrate. We plan to engage the best institutions to do a baseline survey of NREGA households, to find out how much work is need and when. In accordance with this, the shelf of work will be prepared.
The gram panchayat is expected to plan for itself but it has no expertise.
So, how will devolution happen now?
We will divide each block into clusters of gram panchayats. There would be a multi-disciplinary team of experts, including a social work graduate to attend to the needs of these clusters and who would be accountable to the gram panchayat. We would focus on the 2,000 most backward blocks of the country, including those with a high proportion of SC/ST and those vulnerable to Maoist violence. The Planning Commission is preparing a list of these blocks. The idea is not to spread the resources too thin and focus on areas where the need is greatest.
But the programme is having problems across the country with respect to delays in wages and lack of manpower.
Delays in payments is another key weakness of NREGA so far. If we don’t fix it, NREGA has only a bleak future. There is a multi-pronged strategy to tackle this. We will prepare a whole army of local barefoot engineers who will measure the work done in time. We will run two-month courses for capacity-building of these para-workers. The Centre will pay for this either through the six per cent administrative cost or deploy additional funds. The second intervention would be through IT infrastructure. We want a transaction-based management information system such as in Andhra Pradesh, which captures delays real-time and helps reduce these.
The focus on water conservation in NREGA does not help water surplus states such as Bihar or Bengal.
In flood-prone areas, the key NREGA intervention is to strengthen local drainage systems and traditional systems such as Ahar-Pyne in Bihar.
The quality of assets has been questioned with respect to their benefit to the main source of livelihood in villages — agriculture. NREGA is totally cut off from agriculture. How does it become relevant?
How is that?
The water infrastructure built under NREGA has made fisheries possible. Dairies became possible because the Act provides water for fodder. Without water infrastructure, you cannot practise value-added agriculture.
But farmers have been asking for more from NREGA. They want it to provide for sowing and harvesting, as well.
We believe activities such as creating assets like compost pits and livestock sheds can be included in the list of works. States have been asked to give a list of works that they want to be introduced. We can consider location-specific flexibility in norms. If work can be defined and the period can be specified, there can be flexibility. But the fundamental principle is NREGA must be an additionality. It can’t eat into existing employment opportunities.
So, there is a possibility in a limited way that NREGA may be used for farm labour?
Only on the terms I just spelt out.
On the poverty line, the Planning Commission has now put the burden on the socio-economic and caste census (SECC). But states like Bihar still oppose it as it counts families and not individuals. They oppose the food Bill on the same account. What do you think?
Do you think there would be a national commission for a BPL census. Or, will it fail to be finalised in January with opposition from other states?
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
1638 - Planning Commission wants Nandan Nilekani-led UIDAI to be monitored - Economic Times
"The UIDAI's present system represents a major departure from government procedures and removes all inbuilt checks and balances. We need a relook at the UIDAI's administrative structure," the commission wrote in a letter to the finance ministry in the third week of September.
The commission has pointed out that though the UIDAI was set up as its 'attached office' in January 2009 and derives its budget from the ministry of planning, it has never got to examine any of the authority's financial proposals till date. It says the cabinet and expenditure proposals of the UIDAI need to 'normally be seen' by its secretary and financial advisor.
"But neither the secretary nor the financial advisor is in the loop." In a subsequent letter to the finance ministry, the commission has asked for "a full-time financial advisor" to be placed in the UIDAI tasked with the "responsibility of looking into the authority's financial sanctions and clearances".
It has objected to the decision-making structure in the UIDAI that delegates the powers of a financial advisor to a deputy director-general who is also responsible for the authority's programmes and projects.
Typically, financial advisors of government departments are not entrusted with any discretionary policy-making powers so that they can take a fair and independent view of financial proposals.
ADVISOR HAS MANY RESPONSIBILITIES
But the commission says in this case the financial advisor has a number of responsibilities and prepares memos and cabinet notes for the authority. "This takes away the benefit of an independent scrutiny of proposals by an arms' length financial advisor," says the commission.
An e-mail sent to UIDAI officials seeking their views on the Planning Commission's letters did not elicit a response. The Planning Commission's criticism of the authority's way of functioning represents another setback for the body tasked with implementing one of the most ambitious projects of the UPA government.
Earlier this month, the finance ministry shot down a proposal to sanction Rs 15,000 crore to the authority for extending its biometric enrollment programme. This followed objections raised by the home ministry and the commission, which said the programme should be carried out by the census office that is creating the National Population Register.
The UIDAI has also been panned by the labour and rural development ministries which feel its plans will take too long to materialise. The ministries are working on their own independent biometric solutions. The UIDAI's original mandate was to assign a unique identity number to all Indians.
Now, the authority is also working on a brand new payment infrastructure with micro-ATMs to boost financial inclusion.



