In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, October 10, 2015

8901 - The coming disruption in the banking sector

Fri, Oct 09 2015. 01 11 AM IST

The coming disruption in the banking sector

A cashless economy is gradually taking shape; counter-intuitively, this is more inclusive than the cash (and plastic) economy was

The current mindset at RBI isn’t just in favour of mobile payments but also telcos performing some of the roles of banks. Photo: Bloomberg

When the history of Indian banking is written, 2015 will be mentioned as a tipping point.

One reason for that is the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI’s) change of mind (or change of approach). There was a time a few years ago when the Indian banking regulator didn’t appear very keen on mobile payments. The current mindset at RBI isn’t just in favour of mobile payments but also telecom companies performing some of the role of banks.

Earlier this year, RBI issued payment banks licences—some to telcos, others to so-called electronic wallets, and still others to other companies that operate in the broader so-called fin-tech (financial technology) space. Indeed, along with the so-called food-tech companies, these have become magnets for venture capital and private equity investors.

RBI also issued small finance bank licences this year. And governor Raghuram Rajan has talked about all licences—small finance banks, payment banks, even commercial banks (two new banks opened for business this year)—eventually being on tap.

The second reason has to do with e-commerce (and here, the term is broadly defined to include services such as those offered by cab-hailing apps). Indians continue to be hesitant to use credit cards online (although less so than they used to be), but cash-on-delivery, the silver bullet that saw e-commerce take off in India, is slowly but surely being supplanted by wallets. The ATM economy (and ATMs did change consumer behaviour in so far as cash management was concerned) has been replaced by the Paytm economy (Paytm, for those who don’t know, is a popular electronic wallet service that has since expanded into e-commerce; it is owned by One97 Communications Pvt. Ltd, whose promoter has received a payments bank licence).

Big commercial banks are worried about the new entrants and scrambling to launch their own wallets or partnering with people who have payment bank licences to ensure they do not lose ground (or customers).

And amidst all this, a cashless economy is gradually taking shape; counter-intuitively, this is more inclusive than the cash (and plastic) economy was. All you need is a mobile phone; some unique identification number (such as Aadhaar); and a linked bank account. There are around 650 million people with phone connections in India and 920 million people with Aadhaar numbers.