The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, March 7, 2016

9402 - DBT “jammed” by last-mile challenge - The Hindu

NEW DELHI, February 27, 2016

The government’s big push for scaling up Direct Benefit Transfer subsidies using the JAM trinity (Jan Dhan Yojana, Aadhaar and Mobile number) is unlikely to work in rural India in the short to medium-term.

“The JAM agenda is currently jammed by the last-mile challenge of getting money from banks into beneficiaries’ hands, especially in rural India,” says the Economic Survey 2015-16 tabled in Parliament on Friday.

The survey adds there is still some way to go before bank-beneficiary linkages are strong enough to pursue Direct Benefit Tranfer (DBT) without “committing exclusion errors” despite the huge improvements seen in financial inclusion due to Jan Dhan Yojna.

The government must invest in last-mile financial inclusion by further improving banking correspondent (BCs) networks and promoting the spread of mobile money. “The recent licensing of banks will help. Regulations governing the remuneration of BCs may need to be reviewed to ensure that commission rates are sufficient to encourage BCs to remain active.”

To measure states’ preparedness to implement JAM-based DBT, an index has been constructed based on factors such as Aadhar penetration, basic bank account penetration and BC density.
The Urban DBT preparedness index finds there is significant variation across states. Some states like Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh show preparedness scores of about 70 per cent, while others such as Bihar and Maharashtra, have scores of only about 25 per cent.

“The binding constraint here is basic bank account penetration—paying beneficiaries is the issue, not identifying them,” according to the survey. The DBT rural preparedness scores are “significantly worse” than the urban scores, with an average of 3 per cent and a maximum of 5 per cent. “It is clear that last-mile financial inclusion is the main constraint to making JAM happen in much of rural India.”

The Economic Survey suggests incentivising states by sharing fiscal saving from DBT to help fully implement JAM. It adds that policy areas that appear most conducive to JAM are those where the central government has significant control and where leakages are high. “At present, the most promising targets for JAM are fertiliser subsidies and within government fund transfers.”

The example of MGNREGS highlights that delivering within-government transfers via JAM can help other centrally sponsored schemes reduce idle funds, lower corruption and improve the ease of doing business with government. While BC network is developed and mobile banking spreads, the survey recommends use of Biometrically Authenticated Physical Uptake (BAPU), wherein beneficiaries verify their identities through scanning their thumbprint on a POS machine, to reduce leakages.

BAPU preparedness is much better that Rural DBT preparedness with average state preparedness being 12 per cent.