In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, March 27, 2016

9659 - Tech fraternity wants iPhone compatibility with Aadhaar - The Hindu

March 24, 2016


Apple Inc recently named India as one of its most important growth areas for the next decade and is in early stages to bring its retail stores to the country. However, India’s tech community including start-up founders say that Apple should make the fingerprint reader in their iconic iPhone compatible with Aadhaar for biometric authentication, if it has to tap the South Asian country’s market.

Technologists and start-up founders said companies like Apple are acting as a ‘gate keeper’ for biometric authentication. They say the firm is averse to allow open application programme interface that allows access to their propriety software.

“India is now the world’s largest smartphone market and it should compel them (smartphone companies) to change their philosophy,” said India’ s top tech entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani, who spearheaded the country’ s massive unique identification project Aadhaar. “India is an open market, but we also want people in this market to play by our rules,” said Mr. Nilekani who is a mentor at software product think tank iSPIRT, that aims to transform India into a hub for new generation software products.

Mr. Nilekani said the government should take up the issue and make sure the smartphones sold in India with biometric system including fingerprint readers and iris scanners are compatible with Aadhaar. He said the country has certain digital standards which are required for the economic growth and Aadhaar authentication on the smartphone is one of them.

An email query sent to Apple to share insights about their plans of making iPhones compatible with Aadhaar went unanswered.
India has overtaken United States to become world’s second largest smart phone market, after China, with 220 million users according to Counterpoint Research. Experts said smartphone makers like Samsung, Lenovo and Micromax have already made their phones compatible with Aadhaar.

“The current implementation of Apple’s authentication is not Aadhaar-compatible,” said Sanjay Swamy, who worked with the Unique Identification Authority of India and now runs venture capital firm Prime Venture Partners. “It would be terrific if Apple supported the Aadhaar authentication system,” said Mr. Swamy whose firm has backed payment technology start-ups such as Ezetap and Happay.

Two-factor authentication

Experts say that now increasingly for financial and other transactions, consumers would need to do two factor authentication.

One factor of authentication is the phone itself. The second factor of authentication is either biometric (fingerprint reader, iris scanner) or one time password (OTP) linked to biometric authentication, depending on the nature of the financial transaction.

A few start-up founders also said that a closed-source platform like Apple’s mobile operating system iOS will not allow developers to build innovations atop the Aadhaar platform. This becomes more important at a time, when the Cupertino-based firm launched a smaller, cheaper iPhone SE on Monday, aimed at making deeper inroads in emerging markets like India and China.

“There will be an issue. I can’t use this (Apple fingerprint reader) for biometric authentication unless it is authorised,” said Adhil Shetty, founder of BankBazaar.com, an online financial services start-up. The firm is investing heavily on its mobile app that will help consumers get financial products and also provide support to manage their finances. “They (Apple) will have to keep their software system open for Aadhaar.”

Sanjiv Singhal, founder of fintech start-up Scripbox said that a combination of large number of smartphones and mobile devices combined with the availability of an infrastructure like Aadhaar makes India a unique economy.

“Aadhaar is a fantastic opportunity and smartphone brands need to enable their ecosystems to make use of this seamlessly,” said Mr. Singhal.

Privacy concerns

Privacy advocates say that smartphone makers should learn from Apple, for not allowing any backdoors and not compromising on privacy and security.

It is fighting a legal battle with the U.S government that concerns whether and to what extent courts in the U.S can compel manufacturers to assist in unlocking cell phones whose contents are cryptographically protected. But technology experts said in a system like Aadhaar, there won’t be any compromises made in the security standards for capture, transmission, validation and storage of resident data.
“In any biometric authentication, the data is never allowed to be stored anywhere during the transaction,” said Mr.Swamy of Prime Venture Partners.


He is of the view that India is playing a leadership role in the biometrics security standards communities around the world. “We expect other countries and systems to also adopt what India is developing.”