When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place. Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.” -A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty” and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” - Edward Snowden


Here is what the Parliament Standing Committee on Finance, which examined the draft N I A Bill said.

1. There is no feasibility study of the project]

2. The project was approved in haste

3. The system has far-reaching consequences for national security

4. The project is directionless with no clarity of purpose

5. It is built on unreliable and untested technology

6. The exercise becomes futile in case the project does not continue beyond the present number of 200 million enrolments

7. There is lack of coordination and difference of views between various departments and ministries of government on the project


What was said before the elections:

NPR & UID aiding Aliens – Narendra Modi

"I don't agree to Nandan Nilekeni and his madcap (UID) scheme which he is trying to promote," Senior BJP Leader Yashwant Sinha, Sept 2012

"All we have to show for the hundreds of thousands of crore spent on Aadhar is a Congress ticket for Nilekani" Yashwant Sinha.(27/02/2014)

TV Mohandas Pai, former chief financial officer and head of human resources, tweeted: "selling his soul for power; made his money in the company wedded to meritocracy." Money Life Article

Nilekani’s reporting structure is unprecedented in history; he reports directly to the Prime Minister, thus bypassing all checks and balances in government - Home Minister Chidambaram

To refer to Aadhaar as an anti corruption tool despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary is mystifying. That it is now officially a Rs.50,000 Crores solution searching for an explanation is also without any doubt. -- Statement by Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP & Member, Standing Committee on Finance

Finance minister P Chidambaram’s statement, in an exit interview to this newspaper, that Aadhaar needs to be re-thought completely is probably the last nail in its coffin. :-) Financial Express

The Rural Development Ministry headed by Jairam Ramesh created a road Block and refused to make Aadhaar mandatory for making wage payment to people enrolled under the world’s largest social security scheme NRGA unless all residents are covered.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

9955 - Needy may get compensation if PDS ration eludes them - Deccan Herald

Vijesh Kamath, May 9, 2016, Bengaluru, DHNS

The Food and Civil Supplies Department is working on a mechanism to compensate beneficiaries in case of non-supply of entitled commodities under the Public Distribution System (PDS).

At the same time, the mechanism will also help in pinpointing errant fair price shop dealers who fail to provide the entitlements to the beneficiaries.

Harsh Gupta, principal secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, said the National Food Security Act, 2013, had a provision for providing food security allowance to beneficiaries in case of non-supply of entitled foodgrains.

However, the provision is not being implemented as there is no system to cross-verify whether the commodities under the PDS have indeed reached the end-user or not.

The department is now working on a three-phase approach to put a cross-verification mechanism in place.

The first phase is already being experimented by the department as a pilot project of providing biometric-based barcoded coupons to beneficiaries to keep track of commodities provided through the PDS.

The coupons, to be procured by the beneficiaries by providing biometrics at the nearest BangaloreOne centre, can be furnished at a fair price shop to get the ration.

“During the pilot, we found there was a feedback that two visits had to be made to get ration – one to the BangaloreOne centre and then to the fair price shop. We are working on the next phase where coupons can be generated from any computer with an Internet connection,” Gupta said.

A software will be hosted on the department’s website wherein the beneficiary can key in their Aadhaar number and ration card number. On authentication, a One-Time Password (OTP) will be sent to the beneficiary’s registered mobile phone. On keying the OTP into the software, the barcoded coupon with details on the quantum of ration that can be received by the beneficiaries and the amount to be charged will be generated, a printout of which can be taken.

In the third phase, the beneficiary can SMS the ration card and Aadhaar number on their registered mobile to a specific number (not finalised).

On authentication, the barcoded coupon number will be sent back. The beneficiary can show the code to the fair price shop dealer, who can SMS it to the department to get the details on whether the transaction is valid and the quantum of entitlements to the beneficiaries.

These systems will help in monitoring the dealer as he/she cannot give lame excuses. If a genuine beneficiary has been denied entitlements, then compensation can be paid and at the same time the errant dealer penalised, Gupta said.