The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, September 15, 2016

10434 - Gujarat calls AP, Telangana's bluff in e-transaction volume - TNN

Himanshu Kaushik | TNN | Sep 13, 2016, 07.06 AM IST

AHMEDABAD: In 2014, Gujarat was the leading state in terms of e-transactions, but since 2015, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana zoomed past Gujarat. Gujarat is now ranked third when it comes to e-transactions recorded live on Electronic Transaction Aggregation and Analysis Layer (E-TAAL) e-transaction database. 

This raised the eyebrows of officials from Gujarat who analyzed the numbers and found that the two states had exorbitantly high figures in the rural development 'unemployment loans' category, as well as payments linked to Aadhaar cards. 

For instance, Andhra Pradesh, which has a population of only 4.95 crore, claims that e-transactions under the head 'loans for unemployment in villages (krushe)' in rural development department had reported 68.65 crore transactions, and another 13.34 crore transactions which were linked to 'payments linked to Aadhaar(disbursement)'. The two heads accounted to 81.99 crore transactions. The total number of transactions recorded by AP from January 1 to August 9 were 90.70 crore! 

A senior official said that if one looks at the volume of transactions in loans for unemployment in villages in AP it is clear that even a newborn baby would have got a loan for unemployment disbursed twice a month. Similarly, Telangana, which has a population of 3.52 crore has shown 44.5 crore unemployment loan e-transactions. 

Officials realized that there was something wrong in the transaction volumes reported by the two states. Citing such anomalies, the Gujarat government's IT wing wrote to NIC to look into the discrepancies.

After this, since July 16 the two states have stopped all updates. 

Dhananjay Dwivedi, secretary of science and technology, said, "We noticed major discrepancies, and hence we wrote to NIC to look into the transactions. The NIC has taken the issue seriously, and hence all updates in the rural development for the Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have been stopped since mid-July, soon after Gujarat raised the objection."

Meanwhile the number of e-transactions in Gujarat have fallen by 5.59 crore in the last two years, between January 1 and August 9. During the same period, in 2014, there were 44.34 crore transactions, but this dropped to 38.75 crore e-transactions this year.