In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 12, 2016

10415 - Ex-BJP campaign strategist now part-time UIDAI member - TNN


Sep 10, 2016, 07.12 PM IST

NEW DELHI: The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) has inducted as part-time member Rajesh Jain, founder of digital marketing solutions company netCORE Solutions and an ex-BJP election campaign strategist. A long time BJP-backer, Jain was among those handpicked to  drive the BJP's social media and digital campaign for the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. 

Jain is among the three new part time members inducted into the UIDAI. Joining him is entrepreneur Anand Deshpande, who heads IT company Persisent Systems. Former IT secretary J Satyanarayana, a retired IAS officer of the 1977 Andhra Pradesh cadre, will now serve as a part-time chairperson of the UIDAI for a tenure of three years. The three were sworn in for their new roles by Union minister for electronics and information technology Ravi Shankar Prasad in the capital on Thursday. 

Jain is considered to be among the dotcom pioneers in the country. In November 1999, he sold his website Indiaworld.co.in (it brought together a clutch of websites aimed at NRIs) to Sify for Rs 499 crore. In June 2012, the IIT Mumbai alumnus' firm NitiDigital started a right-leaning politics and policy news website, NitiCentral. It also launched india272.com, aimed at coordinating volunteers for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's election campaign. 

NetCORE provided the tech back-end for creating a database of BJP supporters. The much talked-about campaign for the same required those wanting to volunteer to register with a "missed call". The callers would then be contacted for personal information and registered. Voter ID details were part of the database created.
Addressing a question about the possibility of conflict of interest of UIDAI members owing to personal businesses, Prasad pointed out that they would have to abide by section 19 (5) of the Aadhaar Act, 2016. This section mandates that members who happen to be directors at private companies disclose any direct or indirect monetary interest in any matter being considered by the UIDAI.

On Jain's blog Emergic, which has been inactive since 2012, one can find several posts mulling the best electoral strategy for the BJP. In an August 2012 post, the 48-year-old wrote about giving more time to politics as a "peripheral" player. He wrote: "As an entrepreneur and change agent in the political sphere, working to build what I think of as the third pillar of the Indian Right (sic). BJP and RSS are two powerful pillars, but there needs to be a complement to get centre-right policies and transform India." A June 2012 post on his blog suggested a strategy for the BJP to win 275 seats. "Winning 275 needs a dramatically different strategy from trying to win 175. To get to 275 seats out of 350-odd seats, the BJP needs to ensure a "wave" election with a 75% hit rate," it says.