uid

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place. Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.” -A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017


Special

Here is what the Parliament Standing Committee on Finance, which examined the draft N I A Bill said.

1. There is no feasibility study of the project]

2. The project was approved in haste

3. The system has far-reaching consequences for national security

4. The project is directionless with no clarity of purpose

5. It is built on unreliable and untested technology

6. The exercise becomes futile in case the project does not continue beyond the present number of 200 million enrolments

7. There is lack of coordination and difference of views between various departments and ministries of government on the project

Quotes

What was said before the elections:

NPR & UID aiding Aliens – Narendra Modi

"I don't agree to Nandan Nilekeni and his madcap (UID) scheme which he is trying to promote," Senior BJP Leader Yashwant Sinha, Sept 2012

"All we have to show for the hundreds of thousands of crore spent on Aadhar is a Congress ticket for Nilekani" Yashwant Sinha.(27/02/2014)

TV Mohandas Pai, former chief financial officer and head of human resources, tweeted: "selling his soul for power; made his money in the company wedded to meritocracy." Money Life Article

Nilekani’s reporting structure is unprecedented in history; he reports directly to the Prime Minister, thus bypassing all checks and balances in government - Home Minister Chidambaram

To refer to Aadhaar as an anti corruption tool despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary is mystifying. That it is now officially a Rs.50,000 Crores solution searching for an explanation is also without any doubt. -- Statement by Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP & Member, Standing Committee on Finance

Finance minister P Chidambaram’s statement, in an exit interview to this newspaper, that Aadhaar needs to be re-thought completely is probably the last nail in its coffin. :-) Financial Express

The Rural Development Ministry headed by Jairam Ramesh created a road Block and refused to make Aadhaar mandatory for making wage payment to people enrolled under the world’s largest social security scheme NRGA unless all residents are covered.


Search This Blog

Saturday, May 27, 2017

11479 - Delhi HC Declines Centre’s Request to Dismiss Plea Against Basing PDS on Aadhaar - The Wire



The court has also appointed advocate Zoheb Hossain to meet people who have been unable to avail ration benefits due to Aadhaar being made mandatory.

New Delhi: The Delhi high court on Thursday, May 25, declined the Centre’s request to dismiss a petition filed by the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan against Aadhaar being made mandatory to receive ration under the National Food Security Act (NFSA).
A bench comprising acting Chief Justice Geeta Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar appointed Zoheb Hossain, the counsel for Unique Identification Authority of India to act as a commissioner of the court. He would be required to visit the shops where the point of sale (PoS) devices were installed and meet ration card holders who have been excluded from food security due to Aadhaar before filing his report on the subject.
While the Centre wanted the petition dismissed on the grounds that similar petitions were pending before the Supreme Court, the bench turned down the request saying the powers under Article 226, which deals with powers of the high courts, were broader.
Aadhaar leading to exclusions 
The group had contended in its plea that Aadhaar was leading to exclusion of ration card beneficiaries.
It said that with Aadhaar being made mandatory for applying for a ration card, a large number of families who did not have the number have been excluded from the scheme. “Also, in many families, at the time when ration cards were being made in Delhi, those members who did not have Aadhaar were not added to the ration cards.”
Under the NFSA, all those listed on the ration card are entitled to five kilograms of food grains per person. Thus, many families have been unable to access their full entitlements due to the discrepancies which have cropped in.
Malfunctioning PoS machines
The activists also stated that in 2015, the Delhi government had initiated a pilot project in which 42 ration shops were provided with Aadhaar-enabled PoS devices. Due to this too, it said, people were suffering – many of these devices have not been functioning because of recurring problems of network coverage, biometric failures and rejection of even genuine beneficiaries.
Delhi government insisting on biometric authentication
Despite the pain caused by the exercise, the group said the government is still insisting on making biometric authentication mandatory for all shops, causing exclusion of and hardship to genuine card holders in this system.
Incidentally, in March, the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan and Satark Nagrik Sangathan had released a report titled ‘Peoples’ Assessment of the Implementation of Transparency, Grievance Redress and Accountability Measures of the National Food Security Act in Delhi’ which had also flagged the issue.
The report had highlighted how while the pilot was initiated in 42 ration shops, by the time the survey was conducted only 22 shops were still part of the pilot. “Despite evidence of PoS device not functioning, problems of network coverage, problems with biometric failures, the government,” it had said, “is understood to be pushing a proposal to make PoS mandatory for all shops.”
Government failed to disclose PoS pilot report
Criticising the Delhi government for not making the report of the PoS pilot public, the survey had stated that while PoS devices were being touted as a solution for all the problems affecting the distribution of foodgrains under the public distribution system in Delhi, and as an anti-corruption measure, “the fact that these claims are far from the truth was borne out by an audit of some of the shops where the PoS was being piloted.”
Malpractices and violations continue despite Aadhaar
“It was found that these shops were indulging in the same sorts of malpractice and violations as other shops,” the report said, adding that while in a shop at Chandni Chowk, though the shop was Aadhaar enabled, it was found that it was openly indulging in the illegal offence of stocking and selling atta, whose sale is not permitted through PDS.
Siimilarly, giving the instance of another shop in Laxmi Bai Nagar, the report had stated that other than the name and number of the ration shop, no other information was on display at this shop, which too was Aadhaar enabled. “Therefore, the claims of the government that putting PoS machines in the ration shops will resolve issues of corruption and violation is clearly not true and is not borne out by evidence,” the report had insisted.
Affidavits on behalf of affected citizens
Meanwhile, in the issue before the high court, the group has also submitted affidavits of some affected citizens who have been denied rations due to the new Aadhaar norms.
One of these is of Anita Rai, a resident of Jagdamba Camp slum tenement in south Delhi who submitted that while her husband, who is a casual labourer, and she received rations in their name, the names of her two children were not listed in their card as at the time of applying for the ration card, they did not possess an Aadhaar number.
As such, the woman who works as a domestic help, submitted that while they were entitled to 20 kgs of ration for the four members, the family was having to make do with just 10 kgs, leading to an additional financial burden of Rs 400 since they had to procure the remaining ration from the open market. The petition is seeking relief for lakhs of such families who have been adversely impacted by the new Aadhaar norms.

Liked the story? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.