In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label Delhi High Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Delhi High Court. Show all posts

Saturday, May 27, 2017

11479 - Delhi HC Declines Centre’s Request to Dismiss Plea Against Basing PDS on Aadhaar - The Wire



The court has also appointed advocate Zoheb Hossain to meet people who have been unable to avail ration benefits due to Aadhaar being made mandatory.

New Delhi: The Delhi high court on Thursday, May 25, declined the Centre’s request to dismiss a petition filed by the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan against Aadhaar being made mandatory to receive ration under the National Food Security Act (NFSA).
A bench comprising acting Chief Justice Geeta Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar appointed Zoheb Hossain, the counsel for Unique Identification Authority of India to act as a commissioner of the court. He would be required to visit the shops where the point of sale (PoS) devices were installed and meet ration card holders who have been excluded from food security due to Aadhaar before filing his report on the subject.
While the Centre wanted the petition dismissed on the grounds that similar petitions were pending before the Supreme Court, the bench turned down the request saying the powers under Article 226, which deals with powers of the high courts, were broader.
Aadhaar leading to exclusions 
The group had contended in its plea that Aadhaar was leading to exclusion of ration card beneficiaries.
It said that with Aadhaar being made mandatory for applying for a ration card, a large number of families who did not have the number have been excluded from the scheme. “Also, in many families, at the time when ration cards were being made in Delhi, those members who did not have Aadhaar were not added to the ration cards.”
Under the NFSA, all those listed on the ration card are entitled to five kilograms of food grains per person. Thus, many families have been unable to access their full entitlements due to the discrepancies which have cropped in.
Malfunctioning PoS machines
The activists also stated that in 2015, the Delhi government had initiated a pilot project in which 42 ration shops were provided with Aadhaar-enabled PoS devices. Due to this too, it said, people were suffering – many of these devices have not been functioning because of recurring problems of network coverage, biometric failures and rejection of even genuine beneficiaries.
Delhi government insisting on biometric authentication
Despite the pain caused by the exercise, the group said the government is still insisting on making biometric authentication mandatory for all shops, causing exclusion of and hardship to genuine card holders in this system.
Incidentally, in March, the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan and Satark Nagrik Sangathan had released a report titled ‘Peoples’ Assessment of the Implementation of Transparency, Grievance Redress and Accountability Measures of the National Food Security Act in Delhi’ which had also flagged the issue.
The report had highlighted how while the pilot was initiated in 42 ration shops, by the time the survey was conducted only 22 shops were still part of the pilot. “Despite evidence of PoS device not functioning, problems of network coverage, problems with biometric failures, the government,” it had said, “is understood to be pushing a proposal to make PoS mandatory for all shops.”
Government failed to disclose PoS pilot report
Criticising the Delhi government for not making the report of the PoS pilot public, the survey had stated that while PoS devices were being touted as a solution for all the problems affecting the distribution of foodgrains under the public distribution system in Delhi, and as an anti-corruption measure, “the fact that these claims are far from the truth was borne out by an audit of some of the shops where the PoS was being piloted.”
Malpractices and violations continue despite Aadhaar
“It was found that these shops were indulging in the same sorts of malpractice and violations as other shops,” the report said, adding that while in a shop at Chandni Chowk, though the shop was Aadhaar enabled, it was found that it was openly indulging in the illegal offence of stocking and selling atta, whose sale is not permitted through PDS.
Siimilarly, giving the instance of another shop in Laxmi Bai Nagar, the report had stated that other than the name and number of the ration shop, no other information was on display at this shop, which too was Aadhaar enabled. “Therefore, the claims of the government that putting PoS machines in the ration shops will resolve issues of corruption and violation is clearly not true and is not borne out by evidence,” the report had insisted.
Affidavits on behalf of affected citizens
Meanwhile, in the issue before the high court, the group has also submitted affidavits of some affected citizens who have been denied rations due to the new Aadhaar norms.
One of these is of Anita Rai, a resident of Jagdamba Camp slum tenement in south Delhi who submitted that while her husband, who is a casual labourer, and she received rations in their name, the names of her two children were not listed in their card as at the time of applying for the ration card, they did not possess an Aadhaar number.
As such, the woman who works as a domestic help, submitted that while they were entitled to 20 kgs of ration for the four members, the family was having to make do with just 10 kgs, leading to an additional financial burden of Rs 400 since they had to procure the remaining ration from the open market. The petition is seeking relief for lakhs of such families who have been adversely impacted by the new Aadhaar norms.

Liked the story? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

11477 - HC comes to aid of slum dwellers having no Aadhaar cards - DNA


Thu, 25 May 2017-08:13pm , PTI

The Delhi High Court today appointed a local commissioner to inspect South Delhi slums where people are facing difficulty in getting subsidised foodgrains under the public distribution system (PDS) due to lack of Aadhaar cards.
The direction came when a petitioner NGO's counsel told the court that people living in two slums of Malviya Nagar were not only facing difficulty in getting subsidised foodgrains, but the biometric machines for Aaadhaar were also not working due to lack of proper network.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar appointed UIDAI counsel Zohab Hussain as a local commissioner and asked him to visit the two slums and ration shops randomly and see what difficulties people are facing in accessing the food facilities due to want of Aadhaar.
During the hearing, Delhi government's counsel sought time to file reply on the petition which seeks disbursal of subsidised foodgrains to the beneficiaries under the national food security act (NFSA) without Aadhaar cards.
Under the NFSA which was rolled out across the country in November last year, five kgs of foodgrains per person is provided each month at Rs 1-3 per kg to over 80 crore people.
The court asked the petitioner organisation, Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan, to file its rejoinder by September one, the next date of hearing.
The court was also informed that a petition on similar lines was also pending before the Supreme Court which would hear it during summer vacations on June 27.
The Centre had earlier told the court that Aadhaar was made mandatory to ensure that the poor get subsidised foodgrains under the PDS. Terming PDS as a "misused system", it had said that through Aadhaar, the endeavour was to ensure that the real beneficiaries get foodgrains.
Aadhaar is a 12-digit unique identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) after collecting biometric data of the citizens.
The PIL has sought quashing of the Centre's February 8 notification making Aadhaar mandatory for availing benefits under the NFSA. The notification came into effect from February 8 in all states and UTs, except Assam, Meghalaya and Jammu and Kashmir.
The petition says the notification violates the basic principle of law enshrined in Articles 14 (equality) and 21 (right to life) of the Constitution.
The organisation has moved the high court seeking to enforce the fundamental right to food to the residents of Delhi, particularly the poor and vulnerable groups which are dependent on subsidised foodgrains distributed by the Delhi government through the PDS, which it claims is severely impaired by the notification.
Challenging the constitutional vires of the Aadhaar/UID project, the plea has said that due to the enforcement of the notification, people are being deprived of their rightful entitlement under the NFSA.
It said the apex court in an interim order in October 2015 had allowed voluntary use of Aadhaar and ruled that no citizen can be denied a service or subsidy for want of it.
The plea further alleged that the Centre's decision to make Aadhaar mandatory for subsidised food goes against the apex court's interim order and places the most vulnerable at the risk of being left out of the food security net.
(This article has not been edited by DNA's editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)

11476 - Delhi HC appoints commissioner for Aadhaar-related ration card grievances - Factor Daily

Sunny Sen May 25, 2017

In one of the first decisions taken by the Delhi High Court against the government’s linkage of Aadhaar to essential services, which might set precedence for similar cases in future, it has appointed advocate Zoheb Hossain as “commissioner of the Court” to look into matters regarding exclusion from food security due to Aadhaar.

The Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan (DRRAA) had filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court against Aadhaar on March 8. The network of about 30 non-profit organisations working on issues related to food security wanted the notification making it mandatory for people to possess an Aadhaar cards to purchase food grains on subsidy to be overthrown.

The court has asked Hossain to meet aggrieved people and visit retail points using Aadhaar-based point-of-sale devices and report the situation back to the Court. 

On February 8, the Narendra Modi-led government notified that Aadhaar was mandatory to purchase food grains under the National Food Security Act (NFSA).

The appointment of the commissioner is one of the first push-backs against the government, which has been promoting Aadhaar to be linked with multiple utilities, disbursements, income tax, and subsidies.

The court has asked Hossain to meet aggrieved people and visit retail points using Aadhaar-based point-of-sale devices and report the situation back to the Court.
These linkages have given rise to a bigger debate over personal privacy and security, and have led to the creation of many anti-Aadhaar groups.

The DRRAA and Satark Nagarik Sangathan, a citizens’ group working towards promoting transparency in governance, also published a detailed report on the increasing number of instances of exclusion from food security with Aadhaar being linked to the Public Distribution System (PDS).

Apar Gupta, one of the legal counsels to the petitioner, argued that mandating Aadhaar to purchase ration violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The High Court had sought responses from the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution in this ongoing case.
The legal representative of the government requested the bench, comprising of acting Chief Justice Geeta Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar, to dismiss the matter. He argued that “similar cases were pending before the Supreme Court, but judges declined those requests.”
Apar Gupta, one of the legal counsels to the petitioner, argued that mandating Aadhaar to purchase ration violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution.  
Under the NFSA, every person listed for ration is entitled to five kg of foodgrains per month.
Gupta highlighted that Aadhaar was leading to exclusion in a few ways, such as families not having Aadhaar cards and not getting ration cards on that premise. “Despite having several (identity) proofs, several people were denied ration. These were mostly children, who did not have Aadhaar cards,” argued Gupta in the court.

Some of the other instances of citizens being denied ration are linked to not being given ration cards despite having other documents in place, and old people who came repeatedly but did not get rations because of biometric mismatches.

The other problem often occurred at the point-of-sale. About a couple of years ago, the Delhi government had done a pilot with Aadhaar-enabled POS devices in 42 ration shops. There have been reports of technology glitches with the POS machines. Many of those who had Aadhaar cards could not avail ration due to biometric failures.


The next hearing is due on September 1.

Sunday, September 11, 2016

10395 - Why is Aadhaar mandatory for scholarships: Delhi HC - Live Mint



The Delhi high court issued notice to the government on its rule requiring students from minority communities to submit Aadhaar numbers for taking scholarships

Priyanka Mittal

A bench headed by chief justice G. Rohini sought the government’s response within two weeks. Photo: Pradeep Gaur/Mint

New Delhi: The Delhi high court on Thursday issued notice to the Union government on its rule requiring students from minority communities to submit their Aadhaar unique identification (UID) numbers for availing of scholarships.
The ministry of minority affairs mandates Aadhaar for pre-matric, post-matric and merit-cum-means scholarships it offers through the National Scholarship web portal to students from minority communities.

A bench headed by chief justice G. Rohini sought the government’s response within two weeks.

She was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) brought by the Nasimuddin Educational & Charitable Trust, a non-governmental organization, which also challenged the option of having only an online scholarship application process for minority students.
It alleged that a policy forcing a student to apply only online and compulsorily submitting Aadhaar is “unconstitutional, arbitrary, unjust” and violates Article 14 (Right to Equality). It further says that having an online application process alone discriminates against students who do not have access to the Internet.

According to the petitioner, such a policy is unlawful as it is in violation of a Supreme Court judgment which had hold that the UID number cannot be made mandatory for any citizen to avail of benefits under any government scheme or scholarship.
On 11 August 2015, the Supreme Court had held that Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for any government scheme and subsequently restricted the use of the unique identity number to a few schemes.

This is currently under challenge in a contempt petition against the government for allegedly making use of Aadhaar numbers mandatory.

In March, the government passed the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill as a money bill.

A challenge to the passage of the law as a money bill is also being heard by the apex court. The matter will be heard next on 23 September.


10394 - How Aadhaar is mandatory for minority students scholarships: HC - The Hindu

NEW DELHI, September 7, 2016



Delhi High Court today asked the Centre how it could make Aadhaar card mandatory for students from minority communities to apply for various scholarships meant to benefit them.

The court issued a notice to the Centre and asked it to file a reply to the plea which claimed the policy of making Aadhaar card mandatory for applying for pre-matric, post-matric and merit-cum-means scholarships meant to benefit students from minority communities was “arbitrary”.

“Why is this kind of instruction being issued? How can you (Centre) say that Aadhaar is mandatory? You take notice and the concerned officer shall file the reply by September 23,” a bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said.

The PIL, filed by West Bengal-based Nasimuddin educational and charitable trust, has alleged that the policy was arbitrary and discriminatory as it benefited only those having Aadhaar cards.

Challenging the constitutional validity of the need for Aadhaar card and applying online for the scholarships, the plea alleged that it was a violation of Supreme Court’s judgement which had said that Aadhaar would not be mandatory for availing benefits of government’s welfare schemes.

The plea said that Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains and Zoroastrians (Parsis) have been notified as minority communities under Section 2(c) of the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992.

It claimed that the policy of “compelling” students to apply through online process “smacks of non-application of mind since the students most in need of scholarship might not have access to computer, internet or the requisite knowledge of online application”.

The petition, filed through advocates Prashant Bhushan and Neha Rathi, referred to the July 14, 2016 communication of the Ministry of Minority Affairs (MoMA) which had asked the chief secretary or administrators of the states to advertise for the various national scholarships of the ministry.

It said the letter had asked the states to make Aadhar card mandatory for all students to apply for scholarships and also to apply only through the online process.

“Many students belonging to non-affluent families do not have online facilities or the means to avail the scholarships through online means. Similarly, many students do not have Aadhaar cards,” the plea said.

“Such a rule forcing a student to apply only online and compulsorily submitting Aadhaar card is unconstitutional, arbitrary, unjust and violates Article 14 of Constitution,” the plea said.

It has sought setting aside of the July 14 communication besides a direction to the government to allow students to apply for national scholarships through offline means.

Sunday, March 6, 2016

9376 - Delhi HC admits petition seeking copies of contracts between UIDAI and firms - Live Mint


The contracts were for various purposes including the provision of biometric services

Apurva Viswanath

New Delhi: The Delhi high court on Tuesday took up a petition which has sought copies of contracts between the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and companies collecting biometric data from citizens.

The contracts were for various purposes including the provision of biometric services and were between UIDAI purporting to act on behalf of the government of India and two foreign companies.

Petitioner Mathew Thomas who sought this information said this data must be made available to all Aadhaar holders. Justice Manmohan on Tuesday allowed the petitioner to include the two companies in the proceedings. The two companies are Identity Solutions, an Australia-based company that makes specialized fingerprint readers and Accenture, a company registered in the US that uses retinal scanning.

In 2013, the petitioner had filed for access to the contracts under the Right to Information Act and the central information officer had directed UIDAI to furnish copies of the contract. The court noted that UIDAI did not object to disclosing the information before the appellate body of the information commission. The petitioner told the court that, however, certain annexes of the contracts were withheld.
“We cannot disclose the technical aspects of the contract as it is patented technology of the company,” a lawyer representing UIDAI told the court.

Thomas is also one of the petitioners in a bunch of cases pending before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Aadhaar. Some of the cases deal with Aadhaar numbers being made mandatory to avail certain government benefits and services.

Others deal with the number itself being in violation of an individual’s privacy, especially in the absence of any backing regulation or oversight, and still others deal with a possible misuse of the information. The apex court has referred the question on whether Aadhaar violates an individual’s right to privacy under the Constitution.

The UIDAI does not have any legislative backing and was constituted by a notification in 2009 under the erstwhile Planning Commission.

As of now, 920 million Indian citizens have been allotted Aadhaar numbers. The case will be heard next on 3 September.


Friday, May 30, 2014

5557 - Court notice to government on food security act - Business Standard



IANS  |  New Delhi  May 28, 2014 Last Updated at 22:28 IST

The Delhi High Court Wednesday issued notice to the central government on a plea seeking to modification in the rules in the National Food Security Act that requires an applicant to furnish Aadhaar card or enrolment ID for issue of card for the scheme.
A division bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw sought the central government's response by Aug 27.
The PIL, filed by advocate Yogesh Kumar, claimed that a large number of poor population in the city was left out the food security scheme because they don't possess an Aadhaar card or have not registered themselves in the National Population Register (NPR).

The food security card under the act is issued in the name of the senior-most member of the family having annual income of less than Rs.1 lakh and provides subsidized foodgrains to them.

After the National Food Safety Act was implemented in 2013, the Delhi government commenced the process of issuing the national food security card to residents here, said the plea.
Authorities has issued a circular of making it mandatory for applicants to compulsorily add details of the Aadhaar card or enrolment ID for accepting the application form, it further claimed.

It also said that in the absence of the same, the food and supplies department was not accepting such an application form, despite of the fact that the Supreme Court had held that no person should suffer for not having the Aadhaar card.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

5264 - HC refers matter to larger bench - Asian Age



Mar 04, 2014 | PTI | New Delhi

The Delhi high court on monday referred to its larger bench a plea challenging Delhi government’s guidelines making Aadhaar mandatory for getting a National Food Security card.

The petitioner pleaded that the apex court had, in its interim order of September 23 last year, said no person should suffer for not having an Aadhaar card and it is not mandatory for getting social welfare benefits.

Justice Manmohan observed that the matter is before the Supreme Court and sent the matter to a larger bench of the high court which is likely to hear it on March 7.

The petition by Ram Kishan and others has sought quashing of the provision in Delhi government’s guidelines issued under the National Food Security Act, “which requires submission of Aadhaar card and its details by a household for getting National Food Security Consumer Card”.


The plea, filed through advocate Yogesh Kumar, also seeks a direction to the department of food and public supplies to accept the petitioners’ application for the food security card without Aadhaar card and to supply them food grains as per existing norms and rates.

5262 - Move to Make Aadhaar Mandatory Challenged in HC - Out Look India



 The Delhi High Court today referred to its larger bench a plea challenging Delhi government's guidelines making Aadhaar mandatory for getting a National Food Security card.

The petitioner pleaded that the apex court had, in its interim order of September 23 last year, said no person should suffer for not having an Aadhaar card and it is not mandatory for getting social welfare benefits.

Justice Manmohan observed that the matter is before the Supreme Court and sent the matter to a larger bench of the high court which is likely to hear it on March 7.

The petition by Ram Kishan and others has sought quashing of the provision in Delhi government's guidelines issued under the National Food Security Act, "which requires submission of Aadhaar card and its details by a household for getting National Food Security Consumer Card".

The plea, filed through advocate Yogesh Kumar, also seeks a direction to the Department of Food and Public Supplies to accept the petitioners' application for the food security card without Aadhaar card and to supply them food grains as per existing norms and rates.

The National Food Security Act, which was enacted on September 12, 2013, with effect from July 5, 2013, aims to provide foodgrains to eligible households at subsidized prices through the public distribution system.


The petition submits that Delhi government's guidelines under the Act ask for Aadhaar details for identifying the eligible households and the last date for submission of the applications for the food security card is March 15.

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

5256 - Delhi govt's move to make Aadhaar mandatory challenged - Money Control

Mar 03, 2014, 08.22 PM IST | Source: PTI Delhi govt's move to make Aadhaar mandatory challenged 

Justice Manmohan observed that the matter is before the Supreme Court and sent the matter to a larger bench of the high court which is likely to hear it on March 7.


he Delhi High Court today referred to its larger bench a plea challenging Delhi government's guidelines making Aadhaar mandatory for getting a National Food Security card. 

The petitioner pleaded that the apex court had, in its interim order of September 23 last year, said no person should suffer for not having an Aadhaar card and it is not mandatory for getting social welfare benefits. 

Justice Manmohan observed that the matter is before the Supreme Court and sent the matter to a larger bench of the high court which is likely to hear it on March 7. The petition by Ram Kishan and others has sought quashing of the provision in Delhi government's guidelines issued under the National Food Security Act, "which requires submission of Aadhaar card and its details by a household for getting National Food Security Consumer Card". 

The plea, filed through advocate Yogesh Kumar, also seeks a direction to the Department of Food and Public Supplies to accept the petitioners' application for the food security card without Aadhaar card and to supply them food grains as per existing norms and rates. The National Food Security Act, which was enacted on September 12, 2013, with effect from July 5, 2013, aims to provide foodgrains to eligible households at subsidized prices through the public distribution system. 

The petition submits that Delhi government's guidelines under the Act ask for Aadhaar details for identifying the eligible households and the last date for submission of the applications for the food security card is March 15.

5254 - Move to Make Aadhaar Mandatory Challenged in HC




The Delhi High Court today referred to its larger bench a plea challenging Delhi government's guidelines making Aadhaar mandatory for getting a National Food Security card.

The petitioner pleaded that the apex court had, in its interim order of September 23 last year, said no person should suffer for not having an Aadhaar card and it is not mandatory for getting social welfare benefits.

Justice Manmohan observed that the matter is before the Supreme Court and sent the matter to a larger bench of the high court which is likely to hear it on March 7.

The petition by Ram Kishan and others has sought quashing of the provision in Delhi government's guidelines issued under the National Food Security Act, "which requires submission of Aadhaar card and its details by a household for getting National Food Security Consumer Card".

The plea, filed through advocate Yogesh Kumar, also seeks a direction to the Department of Food and Public Supplies to accept the petitioners' application for the food security card without Aadhaar card and to supply them food grains as per existing norms and rates.

The National Food Security Act, which was enacted on September 12, 2013, with effect from July 5, 2013, aims to provide foodgrains to eligible households at subsidized prices through the public distribution system.

The petition submits that Delhi government's guidelines under the Act ask for Aadhaar details for identifying the eligible households and the last date for submission of the applications for the food security card is March 15.

FILED ON: MAR 03, 2014 19:20 IST

FILED IN: GOVERNMENT-GOVERNANCE-GOVERNMENT POLICIES ETC | AADHAR - UNIQUE IDENTITY (UID) CARD | JUDICIARY: COURTS & CONTEMPT | FOOD |DELHI - NEW DELHI