Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

13738 - Job aspirants duped of Rs 3.5 crore in Ghaziabad, three arrested - TNN

Job aspirants duped of Rs 3.5 crore in Ghaziabad, three arrested

Shafaque Alam | TNN | Jun 23, 2018, 02:30 IST

NOIDA:Three men were arrested from Kavi Nagar in Ghaziabad on Friday for allegedly cheating several job seekers of around Rs 3.5 crore in the last two years. The accused have been identified as Preetam Singh (45), a resident of Amroha; Ikramuddin (40) and Dalveer Singh (22), residents of Moradabad.

Raj Kumar Mishra, DSP Noida-STF, said police raided a house in Kavi Nagar and arrested the three accused after receiving information about the gang operating in the area. The STF team recovered 48 debit cards, 38 passbooks, 24 SIM cards, 18 letter pads, 16 mobile phones, 15 cheque books, 12 voter identity cards, 11 Aadhaar cards, 10 PAN cards, seven Paytm cards and Rs 29,200 cash.

During interrogation, Preetam Singh, the mastermind of the racket, said he had completed BSc and BPEd from Amroha but was unemployed for several years. He also applied for Indian Navy but failed the medical examination. He then came up with the plot to cheat jobseekers and make money two years ago. 

LATEST COMMENT
now a days these types of job rackets are very prevelant 
they duped the job seekers and loot there money
Bhupin Kumar

The accused used to contact Naukri.com posing as representative of firms such as Idea International, Entomace Technology India Pvt Ltd, Nigus Microsoft Pvt Ltd, Maruti Solutions Pvt Ltd, etc and offered jobs. He would access job seekers’ data and send them fake interview letters for leading companies. He and his aides demanded that job seekers pay Rs 10,000 or Rs 20,000, sometimes even Rs 50,000, through Paytm to schedule interviews.

Ikramuddin was assigned to provide SIM cards used to make calls to victims. He received Rs 500 for every SIM card he provided. Dalveer used to provide fake documents to open bank accounts. The accused would change the mobile number once a job seeker paid up. “We have registered a case against them under sections 420, 504 and 506 of IPC. They were produced in court and sent to judicial custody,” Mishra said.