In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, June 22, 2018

13696 - Virtual IDs for new SIMs in place of Aadhaar from July 1 - TNN


Nisha Nambiar | TNN | Updated: Jun 16, 2018, 09:36 IST

PUNE: The department of telecommunications (DOT) has directed telecom service providers to change their systems and networks for enabling the use of virtual IDs instead of Aadhaar and opting for the limited KYC mechanism. 

This is a relief for cellphone users as they can provide the telecom service providers either the Aadhaar numbers or the virtual IDs (VIDs) generated by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which will authenticate their name and address details from July 1. 

The June 12 circular issued by the department of telecommunications (DOT) is, however, yet to reach most telecom service providers and retailers. 

The VID is a 16-digit number that is temporary and revocable at any time and is mapped to an individual’s Aadhaar number for authentication. In addition, the UIDAI will provide unique tokens to each agency against an Aadhaar number to establish the uniqueness of beneficiaries in their database. 

The circular mentions that the licensee shall display the Aadhaar numbers or VIDs in masked form at the point of sale terminals and ensure that they are not stored anywhere in its system, application or database. The licensee should follow the e-KYC process using the UID token to ascertain the uniqueness of the subscriber and store it along with other fields in the subscriber’s database. 

The circular added that replacement of Aadhaar number is permitted only with UID tokens for the existing subscribers and that too as a one-time measure. The telcos can’t alter other data in the database. 

“If any incident of alteration/manipulation of any other field comes to notice, such connection shall be treated as pre-activated and penal action shall be taken,” the circular read. 

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has described the telecom ministry’s move as a step towards the customers’ privacy.

“The telecom operators always ensure the subscribers’ privacy and comply with the telecom ministry’s regulations. They are trying their best to make necessary updates in the IT systems by July 1 and implement the suggested changes,” COAI director general Rajan Mathews said. 

Activist and e-governance expert Anupam Saraph said the virtual IDs have come in “very late” as the retailers already have Aadhaar details of most consumers. “Even as the circular mentions that information could not be stored, I feel this has already been done,” he told TOI.

A telecom service retailer here said he was yet to receive the circular. “We have already collected Aadhaar numbers of many customers. We are not sure what we should do with the collected we have already collected,” he said.