In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

13734 - In Jharkhand, Suspected Starvation Deaths Indicate Failure of Governance: Right to Food Campaign - The Wire

While the Campaign has released details of 12 starvation-related deaths in the last ten months, the state government has denied hunger as a cause, absolving itself of any blame.

                      Raghubar Das. Credit: PTI


21/JUN/2018

New Delhi: Revealing details of at least 12 starvation-related deaths over the past ten months, the Right to Food Campaign (Jharkhand) has pulled up the Raghubar Das government for its “lack of seriousness to address the issue of starvation in the state”.
The Campaign has charged that “instead of taking action against functionaries whose lapses have led to these deaths and measures to improve the situation of food security in the state, the BJP government in Jharkhand has denied hunger as the cause of any of these deaths and absolved itself of any blame.”
It added that instead of taking corrective action, state food minister Saryu Roy – who had admitted to government’s mistake in the death of Santosh Kumari last year – has levelled fallacious charges against activists who are highlighting the gross violations of the right to food in Jharkhand.

With three more starvation-related deaths being reported in the current month, (Savitri Devi in Giridh, Meena Musahar in Chatra and Chintaman Malhar in Ramgarh), the Campaign said the government’s lack of seriousness to address the issue of starvation in the state has been exposed. “Even after a spate of deaths before these three victims,” it said, “the government took negligible cognizance of the alarming situation.”

Aadhaar linkage among reasons for denial of ration
Among the causes for the 12 recent starvation deaths, the Campaign said was the denial of subsidised rice due to the absence of a ration card, cancellation of ration card due to the absence of Aadhaar linkage or failure of Aadhaar-based biometric authentication. “It is true that many of the starvation victims were also ill, but they would probably not have succumbed to hunger if they received adequate nutrition and medical care,” it said.

The starvation deaths, the Campaign said, have exposed the exclusion of poor households from the public distribution system (PDS) and the alarming levels of food insecurity in the state. “A highly effective measure of addressing these problems is the universalisation of the PDS in rural areas and inclusion of nutritious items in the PDS. The deaths have also raised questions on the coverage of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) as most of these families, despite living a life of acute poverty, did not have AAY ration cards.”

Lamenting that instead of discussing these moves, the food minister has proposed setting up grain banks. “Even if such banks are established, they will fail to ensure universal access to food security as a matter of right.”

Denial of pension, work under NREGA contributed to starvation
Through its investigation into the death of the 12 citizens, the Campaign also learnt that denial of social security pensions and an absence of work under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) further contributed to the destitution of the starvation victims and their families. “At least four victims were eligible for social security pension, but were either not issued a pension or did not receive their pension due to administrative lapses or Aadhaar-related issues.”

State government’s indifference towards food insecurity is also evident in the manner in which it has been dragging its feet on the withdrawal of the direct benefit transfer pilot experiment in Nagri block of Ranchi. According to the Campaign, the results of the pilot have been “disastrous”. “However, the food department is yet to roll back this pilot or compensate ration cardholders who are denied their legal entitlement to subsidised foodgrain in this ill-conceived initiative. In fact, it has even failed to make public the findings of the government’s own social audit of this pilot”.

In light of all the anomalies that have crept into the food distribution system in the state, the Campaign has called for an immediate withdrawal of the direct benefit transfer for food security pilot. It has also demanded the universalisation of the PDS in rural areas and inclusion of pulses and edible oil in the PDS, saying this was a promise made by the food minister himself. “The government should also immediately remove the mandatory requirement of Aadhaar from PDS – and all other public services – and strengthen the grievance redress system to be established under the National Food Security Act,” it said.
The Right to Food Campaign also released the details of the three recent deaths in the state.

Savitri Devi died of hunger, did not know pension was credited to her account
According to the Campaign, Savitri Devi, a 60-year-old widow, died on June 2 after prolonged hunger and inadequate nutrition. “Her family members do not remember the last time they cooked dal. The household did not have a ration card, despite applying for one at the gram panchayat a few months ago,” the Campaign said, adding that this had contradicted the government’s claim that Savitri Devi’s family did not apply for a ration card.

Also, contrary to the claims made by the government, Savitri Devi was never admitted in RIMS Ranchi for treatment. Even though her widow pension was sanctioned in 2014, the first pension instalment was credited only in April 2018 after her Aadhaar was linked with the scheme. Ironically,  Savitri Devi was not informed that her pension was credited.

Chitaman died of hunger, son tricked into signing statements telling different story
The Campaign said 50-year-old Chitaman of Mandu, Ramgarh lived a life of extreme deprivation and died a hungry man. “He too did not have a ration card. Rather than admitting the alarming situation of the family and its neighbours, government officials tricked Chintaman’s son into signing a statement that told a different tale. Not surprisingly, the food minister later claimed that the son himself admitted that his father died a natural death. His insensitivity towards the issue was also reflected when he suggested that the victim’s body be exhumed for post-mortem. He interpreted the son’s refusal for this as a proof that the victim did not die of starvation,” the Campaign said, pointing to the insensitive approach taken by the government in the case.

Ragpicker died of hunger a week after her infant

The third case was that of Meena Musahar, a ragpicker, who also died due to similar conditions. “According to her neighbours, she was so malnourished that she could not feed her infant, who died a week before her. She did not have a ration card. Jharkhand government has conveniently absolved itself of any responsibility as she may have come from Gaya, Bihar in search of a livelihood. The food minister even said that his department was not responsible for the starvation death of persons who did not have ration cards,” the Campaign said.