In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, January 25, 2013

2759 - City’s residents face a unique identity crisis



KRISHNADAS RAJAGOPAL

Caught between baring it all for the National Population Register (NPR) card and its Aadhar counterpart, residents within the Kozhikode Corporation limits are facing a unique identity crisis.
“The same persons who had gone through the NPR biometric registration have been asked to do it again for the Aadhar programme now. People are asking why they have to give their personal details twice in a row? The explanation given is that data collected for the NPR has somehow been deleted from the computers. This is not proper,” Deputy Mayor P.T. Abdul Latheef said on Tuesday.
Mayor worried
An exasperated Mayor A.K. Premajam admitted in a Corporation Council meeting on Monday that lack of clarity about the biometric data processing for the Aadhar card and alleged deletion of data previously collected for the NPR have become a source of worry.
The debate was initiated in the Council meeting by CPI(M) councillor K. Devaki, who said “people are being asked to go through the biometric registration process all over again. The reason given to people is that data previously stored has been deleted.”
“If data has been lost once and for all, how safe is it to give my personal details again?” Ms. Devaki, who represents Nellikode at the Corporation, said.
Responding to Ms. Devaki’s query, the Mayor said she had called up the District Collector, enquiring whether he had received official information about any loss of data.
“The Collector told me he has no official information regarding this. He had called up the census director, who also replied in the negative,” the Mayor said at the council meet, assuring that she would further look into the matter.
No role, says Collector
Reacting to this, District Collector K.V. Mohan Kumar said the district administration is not the authority concerned with the Aadhar unique identity card project.
“I contacted the Akshaya co-ordinator, who said they are not doing the data collection process within the Corporation limits,” he said.
“There are people saying that data collected previously has been lost. But the district administration has no role whatsoever in the Aadhar unique identity card project itself,” Mr. Kumar reiterated.
‘No major complaint’
On contacting the Akshaya District Project Office, Assistant Project Co-ordinator M. Firoz said his office is not in charge of the Aadhar unique identity card process for areas coming within the Corporation limits.
“We are in charge of the panchayats. We have not received any major complaints from our clients. KELTRON is taking care of the biometric data collection process within the Corporation limits,” Mr. Firoz said.
“People who want to know who is processing their Aadhar card can check the code on the slip you get after the biometric data process. If the code reads ‘2001’, it means KELTRON is processing your card. If the code is ‘2003’, you come under Akshaya,” an Akshaya official in Kozhikode said.
Checking online
“The NPR was done by the Census Department. We are doing Aadhar within the Corporation limits. There has been no deletion of biometric data collected by us. That’s simply not possible. The public can even check their status online,” Pramod Kumar, Regional Co-ordinator, KELTRON, said.
“The same biometric data collected for NPR is being collected for Aadhar too. People can ask why this is being done, but that is a question for national discussion,” he said.
Call for clarity
“The government should make it clear whether it is NPR card or unique identity Aadhar card that a person should take. People take leave from work and children miss school to wait for hours helter-skelter for taking these two cards. It should be made clear which of the cards is mandatory,” K. Radhakrishnan, who is part of a social group, Kerala Janapaksham, based in Chalappuram here, said.


Which card is mandatory – the Aadhar or the NPR, ask the residents.