In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, January 25, 2013

2765 - Cash transfers for Cooking Gas


NEW DELHI: Come July and you will have cash equivalent to your cooking gas subsidy in your bank account, marking the biggest shift in delivery of handouts which could help government curb leakages and reduce the strain on public finances. 

The switch is part of the ambitious three-phase deadline set by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to make the "kind-to-cash" transition based on the Aadhaar numbers. 

At a meeting chaired by Pulok Chatterjee, oil companies, finance and petroleum ministries and the Unique Identification (UID) Authority agreed to put in place a cash transfer mechanism in 50 districts with high Aadhaar penetration by January 1. The cash transfers will start by April 1 in all the districts, where the Aadhaar enrolments are underway. Government has set July 1 as the deadline for the countrywide rollout. 

Under the proposed plan, everyone with a gas connection will have to go to their gas dealers and preferred banks and submit their Aadhaar number. The government will transfer the money into your back account at the start of each month once the cash transfers start. The amount could be used to buy cooking gas at market rate. So, if a cylinder costs Rs 900 per cylinder, you will get Rs 450 for each cylinder till you have exhausted the quota of subsidized cylinders: from six to nine depending on the state where you live. 

The vigorous push for cash transfers is seen as aimed at marrying good economics with smart politics, with the drivers hoping that the switch can prune the subsidy bill without hurting the voters. Rather, an assured amount of cash in millions of bank accounts across the country, so goes the reasoning in certain quarters, can generate a fund of goodwill for the government in the build up to the 2014 parliamentary polls. 

So far, oil companies have only undertaken a pilot project in Mysore, where around 20,000 connections are now mapped to Aadhaar, but cash transfers into individual accounts are facing hiccups due to insistence by banks that subsidy amount be deposited without using Aadhaar. 

In addition, officials said, there are at least three crucial missing links. 

For starters, not everyone has an Aadhaar number, which is at the heart of the scheme, with states like Uttar Pradesh yet to join the identification drive. Currently, there are 21 crore numbers, which would cover roughly five-six crore households, while there are 14 crore cooking gas connections. Nandan Nilekani's UID Authority has been tasked with registering 60 crore individuals but the deadline for this is March 2014. The agency has told the PMO that it can expedite the process but speeding it up to that extent may be tough. As a result, oil marketing companies have now been asked to step up the UID registration drive and take the penetration to at least 80% of the population. 

The absence of bank accounts is seen as another hurdle given that the last census showed that just around 58% of households in India have an account. Although the finance ministry is asking banks to ensure that each household has at least one account, a new mechanism for fund transfer based on Aadhaar is also being proposed. Those who have a gas connection and Aadhaar but no bank account will benefit from the new system as the amount can be claimed from a bank linked to the oil company. You will need to go to the designated bank's branch, fill up a withdrawal slip and submit your Aadhaar to claim the subsidy, an official said. 

To ensure that an individual does not end up getting subsidy on multiple connections, oil companies have to scrub the list but so far only 2.6 crore of the 14 crore connections have been verified. Officials, however, said that this was a comparatively easier task to achieve. 

However, the government is keen to ensure that the mechanism is in place in the penultimate year before the 2014 elections. Sources said that the PMO has asked oil companies and the ministries to finalize a roadmap by the end of the month. 

Times View 

The fact that Aadhar cards are yet to be handed out to a majority of people and several crore do not have bank accounts either presents obvious problems for the proposed cash transfer system of doling out subsidies. It is important, therefore, that careful thought goes into figuring out how these hurdles are to be surmounted and that the implementation too lives up to the plan. After all, the idea behind moving to cash transfers is to improve the mechanism of delivering subsidies. If that does not happen because of faulty design or execution of the mechanism, it could well spell the end of a promising experiment.