In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

2841 - The modern 1984




DECEMBER 7, 2012 LEAVE A COMMENT

At a time when we live in a much closer world , thanks to technology and social media, its a bit worrisome that the Government of India and some private parties are so keen on collecting data about us. Much has been made about the ability of people to hack or find out information about us through technology and the information we willingly put online . But the new Aadhaar proposal and other information seeking proposals may just turn us into an Orwellian nightmare over due time. 

The Aadhaar proposal, when initially discussed, was an initiative to collect biometric data about the citizens of our country to provide a single identification which could finally serve the purpose of the different cards we have to provide, be it a Driving License or a Passport. Modeled on a certain extent to the Social Security Number, with other advancements, it offered both citizens and the Government a chance to simplify processes and provide a much more transparent process of identifying and dealing with citizens.

What scares me, is that the Government has not provided any clarification about the security of the data and what are the controls over the data. Further, the fact that it is to be attached to our bank accounts implies that transactions and our account information will now be accessible to the government, all part of our right to privacy. Equally important, the collection of biometric data itself might be a infringement on our right to privacy. 

In recent times, I have also heard of private firms offering RFID /Bluetooth cards to collect location based data , along with numerous applications which have a strict focus on collection of data on our daily travels. Very few apps or firms are willing to provide a clear policy on how this data is safeguarded and controlled . 

Although some may feel that this post reeks of a doomsday scenario or is overtly fear mongering, one has to but look at the government’s reactions to social media and its usage to tell us that we do need to fear. Ever since the GoI ( or to be more precise, the ruling party) has realized the effect that social media had in helping promote the Anna Hazare event, it has made clear efforts to block and remove all such help. Apart from imposing legal hurdles, it is also clear that organizations involved in promotion of equality over the internet or free knowledge are being shown obstacles at every point. Frequent arrests and intimidation , both legally or physically have ensured that people are hesitant to now express their opinions or provide support, which is precisely what the political parties have been aiming for. 

At the end of the day, these are both constitutional rights which have been impinged upon.The right to privacy and the right to free speech ranks as some of the most important human rights which help differentiate us from autocratic regimes like Burma/Pakistan and China. It is even scarier that we don’t even seem to have a non government organization or a group of lawyers who is fighting the government on a legal basis to ensure a certain level of tolerance for us.Although a few PIL’s have been filed against both events, a systematic approach needs to be taken to ensure safety , both of our rights and of the data involving us.