In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, January 26, 2013

2803 - Putting a name to the face


Kamal K.M.’s ‘I.D.’ humanizes the problems facing poor migrants in Mumbai
 First Published: Fri, Nov 23 2012. 04 50 PM IST

Geetanjali Thapa’s Charu tries to give a migrant his identity

The Aadhaar project is many years away from providing every Indian with a unique identification number, but a cinematic response of sorts is already out. First-time director Kamal K.M.’s I.D. is the story of an Indian without papers, a ration card, a proper address or even a name.

I.D. follows thriller conventions, in that its protagonist trawls through the underbelly of a city in search of a mysterious person, but it is also a political drama. The 90-minute feature succeeds admirably in humanizing migration by poor Indians to Mumbai, the metropolis that encourages individualism but also erases the individual.

The confidently-directed and strikingly-shot film stages a forced encounter between two job-seeking migrants from vastly different social orbits. Charu (convincingly played by Geetanjali Thapa), a management professional who has come to Mumbai to look for work, feels compelled to take responsibility for an unnamed painter (Murari Kumar) who comes to work at her apartment and collapses soon after picking up his paintbrush. Charu takes the man to hospital but he dies and she tries to discover his identity. The quest takes her far out of her comfort zone and into one of Mumbai’s numerous slum sprawls.


Kamal K. M. Photo: Manoj Patil/Mint

The screenplay flowed from an incident narrated to Kamal by a friend. “It talks more about the system, which is a failed system,” Kamal says. “People come in thousands to the city in search of what, we don’t know. They are not coming here out of choice; they are displaced in the name of something. The number of people getting marginalized in the city is increasing day by day, and we don’t have any thoughts about it. When we look at our society, we are getting more and more insensitive.”

The story begins in a fourth-floor apartment in north-west Mumbai and descends into the shanties of north-east Mumbai. The urgency of Charu’s journey is captured vividly by Madhu Neelakandan’s hand-held camera, which produces the right-here-right-now images usually seen in documentaries. “We wanted to experiment with a new kind of realism, we shot in a candid way without preparation or a brief,” Kamal says. “We wanted to confront reality as it is.”

The scenes in which Charu accosts casual labourers at street corners and slum dwellers and shows them a photo of the painter are mostly unrehearsed—the people in the scenes thought they were being asked about a real dead person. “We shot things as they were happening, and we told people after the shoot that we were making a film,” Kamal explains. The reactions were edited out, and the result sits somewhere between fiction and documentary.

Among the organizations thanked in the opening credits are the National Alliance of People’s Movements and The Humsafar Trust. The former’s members helped the crew gain access to three slums in Mankhurd. The latter supplied Kamal with eunuchs, who play an important role in the story. Shooting guerrilla-style in the open had its moments—the crew was stopped thrice by the police and a slumlord on one occasion. “We shot silently,” Kamal says. “When you are shooting in this kind of situation, you have no control over the locations, you don’t have permissions, you don’t want to invite public attention.” The same shot was taken from different points of view, in case one of the angles showed people peeping into the camera, and spliced together on the editing table to create dynamism and urgency.

Thapa, a first-time actor from Sikkim, had to adjust her reactions to suit the shooting requirements and act as naturally as possible without knowing how the scene would pan out. “I was anxious, I didn’t know what would happen, and I just went with the flow,” says Thapa, who will also be seen in Geethu Mohandas’ under-production feature Liar’s Dice. “I surrendered myself and got used to somebody holding a camera and following me around.”

I.D. premiered in India at the Mumbai Film Festival in October, and it’s making many more stops before it shows up in cinemas. Among its halts are the ongoing International Film Festival of India in Goa, the Festival of Three Continents in Nantes, France, also on now, and the International Film Festival of Kerala in Thiruvananthapuram in December. Since the Rs.50-lakh production has been made unconventionally, don’t expect a regular theatrical release. There are also plans to disseminate the movie through social organizations, universities and film societies.

I.D. is the first of hopefully many films that will be produced by the newly minted Collective Phase One. Like other such initiatives in the past, including the Odessa Collective in Kerala and Yukt Film Cooperative in Maharashtra, Collective Phase One pools together the resources and expertise of its members in the service of cinema. Apart from Kamal, the collective comprises cinematographers Rajeev Ravi and Madhu Neelakandan, sound designer Resul Pookutty, editor B. Ajithkumar and production designer Sunil Babu.
“We didn’t make the film to make money,” says 37-year-old Kamal, who worked as a journalist with the Malayalam magazine Sameeksha before studying direction at the Film and Television Institute of India in Pune. He moved to Mumbai three years ago, and his impressions of the city made their way into his debut.

Like all movies, I.D. too “comes out of love”, says Kamal, who made short films after graduating in 2004 and assisted film-maker Santosh Sivan on a bunch of projects. “When I moved here, people asked me if I was scared of Bombay. I would say I was perplexed by the geography, the pace. You realize that the city isn’t moving according to any rules, but there is harmony within the chaos. I was quite amazed by this, and I started loving it.”