AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 2835 - Panel seeks fresh legislation on UID project

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, January 28, 2013

2835 - Panel seeks fresh legislation on UID project

Panel seeks fresh legislation on UID project

Yashwant Sinha-headed panel has reiterated the need for fresh legislation despite assurances from the government

BJP leader Yashwant Sinha. The proposed legislation will provide for the creation of the National Identification Authority of India, which will oversee the implementation of the Aadhaar project to provide unique IDs. Photo: HT

New Delhi:

The parliamentary standing committee on finance chaired by senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Yashwant Sinha has reiterated the need for fresh legislation on the unique identification (UID) project despite assurances from the government.

The ministry of planning addressed various issues pertaining to the need for project security, privacy and budgetary concerns in its response to the earlier report of the committee.

The “ministry of law and justice as well as the attorney general of India have opined that action to enroll residents by UIDAI (Unique Identification Authority of India) in terms of the executive notification issued on 28 January 2009 is valid,” it told the committee.

It added that the government is pushing for a UID legislation as it felt a regulatory structure supported by a legal framework would lead to more effective functioning of UIDAI.

“Particularly, any violations of security and privacy of UID data on the part of any of the stakeholders that may arise in the future, could be dealt with in a more rigorous and firm manner under a defined legal mechanism which would be possible by enacting the proposed National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010,” it added in its response.

However, the committee said that the government should urgently address the various issues pointed out by it in the earlier report and “bring forth a fresh legislation before Parliament”.

The proposed legislation will provide for the creation of the National Identification Authority of India, which will oversee the implementation of the Aadhaar project to provide unique IDs. The Bill will ensure that the authority has the legal sanctity to execute the project.

It also seeks to define the penalties for misuse of the data collected under the UID project. Some political parties had recently raised concerns over the government rolling out cash transfers of subsidies without the UID Bill being passed in the Parliament. The Aadhaar number is one of the elements of the cash transfer programme.

“So many state agencies such as banks, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana etc don’t require a separate legislation to collect biometrics in the country. UID has 100% legal backing and there is a misconception that it can’t operate without the legislation being passed,” a senior government official said.

The government said in November that it would start rolling out direct cash transfer of subsidies and benefits based on UID in around 50 districts by 1 January, across 18 states from 31 April, and to the rest of the country by 2014.