In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, January 25, 2013

2748 - ‘Aadhaar’ gets more teeth, NPR faces procedural delay


By Yatish Yadav - NEW DELHI
Published: 23rd Sep 2012 08:31:33 AM

The UPA government’s cronyism towards glitch-ridden ‘Aadhaar’, reflected in a slew of measures recently suggested to the Union Home Ministry, may escalate the budget and further delay providing identity cards to its citizen which is supposed to start from 2014.

The National Population Register (NPR), a project under Ministry of Home Affairs, is running at a snail’s pace after the government asked the Ministry to avoid the states where Unique Identification Authority of India (UADAI) is collecting biometrics data for ‘Aadhaar’ number, clearly favouring UIDAI over the NPR.

Sources said the NPR can only start the process after UIDAI is finished with over 70 per cent of work which may delay the entire project by another two years. The deadline to complete the entire NPR process was 2014 but it can be extended to 2016. The government has already spent `1,972 crore on UIDAI project till August 2012 and according to sources, a demand of Rs 5,000 crore for this year is still pending. As per the estimate, ‘Aadhaar’ project will cost approximately `45, 000 crore to the national exchequer.

“NPR can only enter a state other than allocated to it after UIDAI has completed more than 70 to 80 per cent of work which will put the entire NPR project at risk,” sources said.

As of now UIDAI is collecting biometrics data for ‘Aadhaar’ number in 19 states. Once UIDAI completes its process in a particular state, NPR will not capture the biometrics data but instead use ‘Aadhaar’ number and data collected by the UIDAI.

 “But due to authenticity of the Aadhaar numbers in several states under scanner, the NPR will have to do the complete exercise in some areas to avoid the ‘fake’ data ,” sources said.

An official of NPR on condition of anonymity said, the systems are in place and NPR has already digitised the data of 1.21 billion people collected through house to house enumeration in 2010. “But because of the government’s new decision we can only capture the data for NPR after UIDAI finishes its job. This arrangement will not only delay the entire process but will increase the budget of entire exercise as state governments will have to use their resources in setting up two camps,” he said.

It is learnt that despite the then Home Minister P Chidambaram’s letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in June to resolve the de-duplication of data issue, NPR is still facing problem because of the procedural delay by the UIDAI. Chidambaram had told Prime Minister that the UIDAI was objecting to the conduct of NPR camps in certain states and also refusing to accept the biometric data of NPR for de-duplication and generation of ‘Aadhaar’ numbers.

 “The NPR project is almost at a standstill at present due to refusal of the UIDAI to accept the data collected under NPR for de-duplication and generation of ‘Aadhaar’ numbers,” Chidambaram had told the Prime Minister in June.
Sources said process of certification and activation of operators in the UIDAI system is long drawn which is delaying the NPR project and in several states UIDAI has hired new operators who are yet to settle down with the new system which is also raising security concerns.

 “The MHA has consistently raised issues regarding the process and data security under UIDAI. Assurances have been made that the security loopholes would be addressed. However, breaches are often being reported in the media which affect the credibility of the entire project. A comprehensive review is required to address this in totality,” NPR status report prepared by Home Ministry said.

Sources privy to the development said after last meeting on June 7, PMO asked Home Ministry to bear with UIDAI and not rake up the issue again.
“Since then we are clueless on several important issues including self audit of UIDAI to look into ‘fake Aadhar’ numbers. Now they are collecting data and we keep a tab to see if the development reached to a substantive portion before we make a move. Last week we decided to move in to Tripura to capture the data after UIDAI finished its job,” sources said. According to officials in the Home Ministry, sourcing data from UIDAI has its own risk. Recently it received an Aadhar number issued to a tree in Delhi which raises serious security concerns.
“There are various such complaints but the UIDAI so far has not been able to fix the procedural problems while capturing the biometrics data which may end up creating more obstacles for NPR,” sources said.