In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, October 16, 2010

723 - How India can strive for corruption-free society - Express Buzz



P Haridas 
First Published : 14 Oct 2010 12:00:00 AM IST

I must congratulate the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) for involving the citizens of India to explore how to work for a corruption-free India. It is impossible to meet this challenge in a matter of a few years. Unfortunately our great country has been identified as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. This was not so till the 1970s. All citizens of the country who are really dedicated to the nation are concerned about this malaise. Even when there is a common platform it has become the practice to invite someone big who is himself tainted. Therefore there is no gathering of like-minded people who are all committed to the welfare of the nation who can voice their views and take corrective steps.

Today it is widely accepted that there is a price tag for every office that is held mostly in the government sector and sometimes in the private sector. For a corruption-free society there are three important arms which should be totally filled with people with integrity, namely the judiciary, the army and the police.

I, as a student of history, personally feel that no system of government has survived for over hundred years. At one time the Chinese emperors were the world leaders, then the Czars of Russia, the Roman Empire, the Greek Empire and of course our own Bharat, thousands of years back. We have to first find out whether our system of governance is the right one. For a person to get elected he/she has to necessarily meet his/her electorate which runs into lakhs. How does one expect to meet so many people unless money is spent? This generates dishonesty among those who aspire to be representatives of the people. Thus, naturally his/her first goal would be to recover whatever money he/she has spent to get elected. This has a chain of reactions.

So the first suggestion is that only national parties should field candidates and they should spend money for electing their representatives. Thus, the party becomes stronger than the individual. Only at designated places the parties shall enumerate or display their candidates and display the parties’ programmes, projects and their missions.

Even though the high court and the Supreme Court are constitutional authorities, the manner of their appointment leaves much to be desired. 

Like the Election Commission there must be a high level judicial commission consisting of five persons of integrity who shall serve for a period of five years. It is this commission that should try to find out persons with integrity for various judicial posts. 

With every citizen getting a unique identification card (Aadhaar) and in addition the PAN card the details of every individual can be easily obtained through modern technologies. Similarly there must be a finance commission which shall have three to five members with top integrity which shall decide the financial policy of the country.

All the ministers who are elected can implement their decisions or promises to their constituencies as per the policies laid down by these experts. The sensitive issue of reservation is one more factor that leads to all manipulations for making the unworthy worthy. It may be a tall order to bring the policy of reservation to an end. Only merit and ability should be the consideration. All sections of people should have access to all posts only on the basis of their merits and abilities. Ambedkar himself had given a limit of 50 years for any such reservation.

There must be a national development council whose sole object should be to develop and upgrade the infrastructure and the basic necessities to be provided to citizens. These are just a few stray thoughts that have occurred to me and I am sure that with many more inputs from like-minded patriotic citizens we can make our Bharat a corruption-free nation. 

There is no acid test to find out a person’s integrity, loyalty and honesty. The persons who are policy-makers should not have the authority to implement the policies they formulate.

The next question is how do we get such persons, when we have literate and illiterate people who are equally concerned with the progress and development of the nation. Each party should have a strict screening test to identify the honesty, integrity and commitment of the person whom they propose to nominate for election. The test need not be a written one. It could be done by exposing the candidate to public duties and assessing how he/she responds to it. The whole process will be overseen by a group which will impartially assess the candidate. Since such persons will be full time dedicated and involved in the building of the state, they must be kept above wants — this will help them in giving their full time and talent to the nation.

This is only a broad sketch which I agree cannot be put into practice within a particular time schedule but at least we as citizens of India should activate our thought processes so that one day we will have the Bharat which Lord Macaulay observed 175 years back when he saw the Bright India making development in all spheres and wondered how the British could make inroads to grab the sovereignty of the nation.

Our country is the only one proclaiming a value as a mission, namely Satyameva Jayate. Let truth be victorious. I am sure we can see a similar Bharat once again. Jai Bharat. Jai Hind!
(The writer is a senior advocate in Chennai)