In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, April 30, 2011

1251 - UID must for driver's licence - Source- TOI

MYSORE: Don't have Aadhar number? You could be in trouble.

In a move to meet the June-end deadline for the unique identification (UID) number scheme, the Mysore district administration has made it mandatory for learner's licence or driving licence. If you have already applied for Aadhar, just quote the enrolment number to get the licence.

Deputy commissioner Harsh Gupta said on Friday that they are starting with the RTOs in the district. Next it will be implemented at the Mysore City Corporation and Mysore Urban Development Authority for those seeking licences for construction of a house or buying site.

UID number is a 12-digit number allotted to the residents. Some 16.70 lakh in Mysore district have enrolled while an estimated 10% of 16.70 lakh have got their UID number.

People seeking to get government benefits will have to produce Aadhar number. Be it for enrolment under the rural employment guarantee scheme, getting new telephone connection or opening a bank account, the number is mandatory. It will be further extended for payment of income tax.

1250 - PlayStation privacy breach: 77 million customer accounts exposed Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/games/playstation-privacy-breach-77-million-customer-accounts-exposed Source - Sydney Morning Herald

April 27, 2011

An unauthorised person stole names, addresses and other personal data including potentially credit card details belonging to about 77 million people who have accounts on Sony Electronics' PlayStation Network, Sony said.

The "illegal and unauthorised person" got access to people's names, addresses, email address, birthdates, usernames, passwords, logins, security questions and more, Sony said on its US PlayStation blog.

Children with accounts established by their parents also may have had their data exposed, Sony said.

Advertisement: Story continues below
Sony, whose PlayStation online service has been down for about a week, said it saw no evidence that credit card numbers were stolen, but warned users that it could not rule out the possibility.

"Out of an abundance of caution, we are advising you that your credit card number (excluding security code) and expiration date may have been obtained," Sony said.

The online marketplace let users buy and play video games on their PlayStation consoles.

The company said the account information for the PlayStation Network and its Qriocity service users was compromised between April 17 and April 19.

The company said its users could place fraud alerts on their credit card accounts through three U.S. credit card bureaus which it recommended in its statement.

Sony, a unit of Sony Corp, said that it could restore some of the network's services within a week.

The online network launched in fall 2006 and offers games, music and movies to people with PlayStation consoles. It had 77 million registered users as of March 20, a Sony spokesman said.

Sony did not indicate whether it identified a culprit in the intrusion.

Internet vigilante group Anonymous had vowed retribution against Sony for taking legal action against hackers who cracked PS3 defenses to change console operating software.

A message signed by Anonymous at website anonnews.org early this month announced an "Operation Payback" campaign aimed at Sony because of its cases against the two hackers, one of whom cut a deal to settle the case.

Anonymous argued that PS3 console owners have the right to do what they wish with them, including modifying them.

Reuters and AFP

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/games/playstation-privacy-breach-77-million-customer-accounts-exposed-20110427-1dvhf.html#ixzz1L00TDaVS

Friday, April 29, 2011

1249 - MP links Aadhaar to food scheme - Source - Indian Express

By Millind Ghatwai

Posted: Fri Apr 29 2011, 01:31 hrs
Bhopal:

Buy Flower & GiftDiscount ShoppingPerfumesFlower & Cake
Discussion
Blogs
Winds of middle east... - By roop peshen
Yadav - By virender
Shame on u looters - By Citizen
Indian democracy - By Mahender Pal
Ridiculous - By Mayur Bahl
Us disappointed indi... - By NRI Oz)
Us disappointed - By Venkat


Madhya Pradesh has become the first state to link Aadhaar, the 12-digit number issued by UIDAI, to the subsidised foodgrain scheme.

The state government thinks the new arrangement will totally eliminate fake beneficiaries of the subsidised foodgrain scheme.

MP has cancelled lakhs of bogus ration cards over the last couple of years that were proving to be a drain on the public distribution system.

Commissioner, Food and Civil Supplies, Ajit Kesari, who is also UIDAI Registrar, said the first phase of issuing cards in Hoshangabad, Harda, Shajapur, Dewas and Burhanpur districts was over.

One last chance will be given in May to those who have not registered themselves so far before the food coupon system is put in place in June/July.

More than 1.61 UID cards have been issued in these districts while five lakh others have registered themselves. 

1248 - Because FREEDOM cannot Protect itself- American Civil Liberties Union

Hey! Do you use the Internet?

The things we do and say online leave behind ever-growing trails of personal information. With every click, we entrust our conversations, emails, photos, location information and much more to companies like Facebook, Google and Yahoo. But what happens when the government asks these companies to hand over their users' private information?

As stewards of our digital lives, companies are the first line of defense when it comes to keeping private information private. Companies should:

Tell you when the government is asking for your information so that you can protect yourself;
Disclose how often they share information with the government;
Stand up for user privacy in the courts and in Congress. Most urgently, companies should advocate for an update to the outdated Electronic Privacy Communications Act (ECPA) which was passed in 1986, before the Internet as we know it today even existed.
Act now to tell the Internet companies that you use that you expect them to stand with you and protect your privacy.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

1247 - UID card issuing firm may wind up - Source - TOI

25th April 2011

LUCKNOW: Mismanagement at Lucknow Municipal Corporation (LMC) has left little option for the company entrusted with the job to issue unique identity (UID) cards. "The company," sources said, is contemplating to wind up its operations from Monday onwards.

Smart chip, the company had decided to operate from LMC head office in Lal Bagh, days after it managed to convince the corporators to endorse people as citizens of their respective wards. Even as, the company set up counters at the municipal head office, there was a huge flow of people seeking UID cards. The swarm of people could not be managed amidst reports of brawls being often reported.

While, municipal officials said that they were trying to negotiate with the company, official sources said that the talks were bearing hardly any fruits.

Officials however confirmed that there were reports of people entering into heated argument with the company officials often and then repeatedly lodging complaints with senior municipal authorities.

The project was initiated with the help of State Bank of India ( SBI), where people were required to open bank accounts, even with zero balance. After various rounds of presentations that convinced the local authorities, the company started its operations from LMC's head office

1246 - It will take two years for all Bangaloreans to get UID number - Source DNA

Published: Saturday, Apr 23, 2011, 8:44 IST
By Srikant Hunasvadi 
Place: Bangalore 
Agency: DNA

The distribution of Unique Identification (UID) number to 6.11 crore Bangaloreans will be completed only by July 2013, even though those in Mysore and Tumkur are likely to get their 12-digit Aadhaar numbers in six months.

Though the state has given administrative clearance, it will take time to commence the issuance of Aadhaar number to the citizens.

Ashok Dalwai, deputy director-general, Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), said the pilot project taken up in Mysore and Tumkur was on full swing, and distribution of UID numbers would be completed in those two districts within six months. “After Mysore and Tumkur, we have planned to take up this project in two stages. The e-governance department has invited tenders last February for eight districts, where the second phase of the project will be implemented,” he said.

The state cabinet had, on Thursday, cleared the decks for the launch of UID in the remaining 20 districts, including Bangalore city. The e-governance department has called tenders already for 28 districts, and the issue of the unique identity numbers will start by June end.

In Bangalore, the work would start from July 1. “After the finalisation of tender, infrastructure has to be created, which will take another 20 to 30 days,” Dalawai said.

“UID authority and e-governance department have planned to launch the distribution of Aadhaar numbers in all the 30 districts before June 30. Once it is started, it will take at least two years for completion. We will be able to issue the UID numbers to all 85 lakh people in Bangalore city by 2013,” he added.

Meanwhile, the e-governance department has planned to set up Aadhaar centres in all the 198 wards in the city, with the help of the assistance of BBMP.

Monday, April 25, 2011

1245- Re-discovering Decentralisation - The State of Panchayats- Source - INCLUSION

Except Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Goa, and Chhattisgarh and to an extent Madhya Pradesh, a majority of the states has been reluctant to delegate responsibilities to Panchayats as mandated by 73rd amendment of the constitution. A report by Team Inclusion

Her drawing room cabinet brims over with awards, trophies, mementoes and citations she has received over the years from central ministries, departments and non-governmental organisations. Moreover her popularity can be gauged from the fact that she has headed her village Panchayat for over a decade. Yet Radha Devi, Pradhan in Meethi Beri, a tiny hamlet on the periphery of Dehradun, is far from being happy and content. On the contrary, she sounds quite helpless and hassled.

No ‘Honorarium’
For one, she cannot even issue a BPL (Below Poverty Line) card to a widow who deserves it most in her village. She has already used up quota of 37 BPL cards, the state fixed for her over nine years back. Devi has not been paid since March last year Rs 600, the meagre honorarium Uttarakhand government is supposed to pay its Gram Panchayat heads every month. Worse, despite having inquired from several top functionaries including District Collector (DC) Dehradun and her District Rural Development Officer (DRDO), she is not any wiser about why the payment has not been credited to her account. The Gram Panchayat has Rs 33,000 in its account out of which Rs 15,000 is meant for street lighting and the rest can be spent only on supply of drinking water. “There is not much I can do simply because there are no funds,” she mumbles looking resigned to the situation.

For record, the State government issued executive orders in January 2005 delegating 14 departments and supervision of employees of these departments to the Gram Panchayats. But in practice Radha Devi and the other 7,540 gram panchayat heads in the State are still stuck up with construction of streets, issuance of limited number of APL (Above Poverty Line), BPL & Antodaya cards, installation of hand pumps, fixing streetlights and making job cards under MNREGS (Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme), the subjects they have handled for several years. They also have been entrusted with minor irrigation and watershed department. Besides, they can levy property and panchayat tax and recommend names for pension for widows, old and handicapped. In case of government schemes like Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY), Sarv Siksha Abhiyan (SSA), National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) and Mid-Day Meal scheme etc, the fund is transferred either directly to the beneficiary or in joint accounts of Gram Pradhan and Panchayat Secretary and Gram Pradhan and Headmaster of the primary school. 

Panchayat Secretary at a Premium
Since many of the Gram Panchayat functionaries are either semi literate or illiterate, they are left at the mercy of Panchayat Secretary or the School Headmaster. Though the Panchayat Secretary is supposed to report to the Gram Panchayat, in practice it is on the contrary. In Sawra, an extremely backward village in the interiors of Chakrata (Dehradun), Panchayat Secretary Kedar Singh Tomar is assigned to over a dozen Gram Panchayats and hardly has time for Sawra Gram Pradhan Rekha Kaul. Therefore, every time Kaul needs to discuss a developmental work with him, she either travels all the way to Chakrata block or arranges a lavish non-vegetarian dinner for him at her residence. “I’ve to serve him chicken every time I need his services,” Kaul regrets. The school headmistress too expected Kaul to sign on blank cheques. When Kaul attended Gram Panchayat functionaries’ dharna at Vidhan Sabha in October 2009, her first and foremost demand was for allocation of an exclusive Secretary for Sawra. The PRI representatives of the 13 districts sat on dharna for over 22 days and submitted a 9-point charter of demands to State Chief Minister Ramesh Pokhriyal ‘Nishank’ and Panchayati Raj Minister Rajendra Bhandari. The charter included demand for transfer of functions, funds and functionaries to the Panchayats, formulation of state Panchayati Raj Act, increase in Gram Pradhans’ honorarium, payment of honorarium to other Panchayat members and replacement of Gram Panchayat pradhan with DRDO as nodal officer under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

But even a year after the agitation, there is no further addition either to their functions, funds or functionaries. The state does not even have its panchayat act 18 years after the central government constitutionalised PRIs through 73rd amendment and advised the states to form their own acts and transfer subjects listed in 11th schedule to the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). Uttar Pradesh Panchayati Raj act is in force in Uttarakhand. A report with Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj on Uttarakhand notes that ‘orders were issued by the State in regard to 14 subjects, giving certain powers of seeking information and supervision to Panchayats over officials but Panchayats exercise ‘limited control over officials.’ The report also adds that funds are available to PRIs (Block/Intermediate Panchayats and Zila Panchayats included) ‘for activities for only three functions’ – poverty alleviation, rural housing and women and child development.

&sanitation, agriculture, women & child development, education, social welfare, development, horticulture, youth welfare and information technology (IT) are yet to entrust any funds or officials to the Gram Panchayats. Forget about creation of software, hardware and connectivity – the essentials of ICT infrastructure - many Gram Panchayats in the state do not even have a proper building. The Panchayat bhawan in Meethi Beri for instance leaks during rains, is always waterlogged and crying for maintenance. Radha Devi sent repair estimates to DRDO two years back but is yet to hear from him. A status report of Union Panchyati Raj Ministry puts zero under ‘Gram Panchayats where some sort of computing facility is available’ against 7,541 Gram Panchayats in the State. The state government distributes central and state allocations on 20:30:50 ratio to the ZP, BP and the GP respectively.
    

The story so far or Timeline

73rd amendment comes into effect in April 1993 according a constitutional status to local governance. The amendment into article 243 envisages states to establish a three-tier system of strong, viable and responsive Panchayats at the village, intermediate (block) and district levels and conduct their elections after every five years. The 29 matters listed in the 11th schedule including agriculture, water management, rural housing, drinking water, roads, education, poverty alleviation programmes, health and sanitation, women and child development and public distribution system are to be transferred to the PRIs. The amendment leaves it to the discretion of the states to allow Panchayats to impose taxes, duties, tolls and fees.

May 2004:
Manmohan Singh government decides to create a separate ministry for Panchayati Raj tasked with formulation and implementation of an Action Plan for seeing PRIs to emerge as ‘institutions of local self-government’ securing economic development and social justice in their respective area. There is great hope when within first 150 days of its formation the ministry convenes a series of Seven Round Table Conferences of State Panchayati Raj Ministers to identify 18 dimensions ranging from devolutions of the functions, finances and functionaries, to District Planning, Training, Capacity Building and IT-enabled e-governance for implementation on priority.

December 2004:
The Seventh Round Table Conference, organized in Jaipur, proposes to utilise IT as i) a decision making support system for Panchayats; ii) a tool for transparency, disclosure of information to citizens social audit; iii) a means for better and convergent delivery of services to citizens; iv) a means for improving internal management and efficiency of Panchayats; v) a means for capacity building of representatives and officials of the Panchayats; and, vi) an e-Procurement medium. The Conference recommends a systematic approach for training of staff and Panchayat representatives through IT. It decides to develop common software application packages with provision for appropriate customisation by states through National Informatics Centre (NIC). It expects National Panchayat Portal (NPP), a collaborative, content management and website generation framework developed by the NIC for Ministry of Panchayati Raj that allows seamless exchange of content among all participating sites, to be the information hub for linking up Gram Panchayats (GPs) with Intermediate and District Panchayats, state governments and the central government.

March 2006:
An expert group, set up in 2005, finds it feasible to transfer funds from State consolidated funds to the PRI through ICT and Planning Commission issues guidelines mandating centralised planning from 11th Five Year Plan onwards.

May 2006:
Another milestone is reached when UPA approves the National e-Governance Plan (NeGP) comprising 27 Mission Mode Projects (MMPs) and 10 components, with the centrality of citizen service delivery. One of the MMPs pertains to Panchayati Raj Institutions as one of the key projects under the NeGP.

June 2007:
The UPA government constitutes an Expert Group to a) assess the IT programmes which are either in operation or which could be taken up for implementation in future; b) advise on the most cost effective technology for reaching IT to the Gram Panchayat levels; c) effectively implement distance learning for capacity building through IT; and, d) workout the requirements of budget for implementation of the IT programmes.
The group, chaired by Dr B K Gairola, then Director General of National Informatics Centre and comprising Sameer Kochar, Chief Editor and CEO of Skoch Consultancy Services, Professor Ashok Jhunjhunwala of IIT Madras, H S Ashokanand, Director SIRD, Karnataka and Professor M Aslam, Director of Distance Education in IGNOU, holds several meetings, visits many Gram Panchayats and conducts video conferences with the States to understand the working and effectiveness of satellite based training facilities there.

January 2008:
The expert group submits an exhaustive report to the ministry covering almost all aspects of utilisation of ICT in the Panchayati Raj Institutions. The report elaborates on how the integration of the Panchayats through technology can lead to building of capacity of the PRIs in terms of knowledge as well as resources, usher transparency and accountability through social auditing and suo-moto disclosures, permeate ICT culture in villages and create jobs. It identifies key application areas, which can be taken up with priority as planning, financial accounting, progress monitoring, delivery of birth and death certificates and house tax. The report proposes extension of Planplus, an application that integrates plans of the PRIs, district planning committee and PRIASOFT, an accounting software that facilitates book keeping of accounts.
The expert group recommends use of NICENET and SWAN for providing connectivity to the PRIs at the village and block level. To ensure interoperability and avoid vendor locking, the group recommends open standards, open source technology and open source operating system.
The report underscores the need for building core applications centrally and second category of applications locally. It seeks development of Indian language UNICODE fonts for convenience of Panchayat functionaries and representatives. The group even spells out the number of computers and manpower needed for different Panchayats.
Accentuating the need for innovative thinking and approaches, the group calls for multi-mode training intervention and interactive satellite-based intervention to train the panchayat officials and members in ICT use. It suggests utilisation of institutes of rural development, Extension Training Centres, distance education centres of IGNOU for the purpose.

April 2009:
The MoPR issues guidelines to States on devolution of institutions and functionaries to the PRIs detailing who needs to be transferred to which tier of the panchayat.

September 2010:
The MoPR calls meeting of State Panchayati Raj Ministers and Secretaries to discuss creation of dedicated Gram Panchayat Services for implementation of the MNREGS. The meet agrees to create posts of Panchayat Development Officer (PDO) and Junior Engineer (JE) for the purpose.

November 2010:
The ministry proposes to fund 90% of the expenses incurred on appointment and salary of the PDO, the JE and training of Gram Rozgar Sahayak (GRS) in computers in the first year.

February 2011:
The Ministry of Panchayati Raj asks the States to enhance the Capacity Building & Training (CB&T) in Panchayats across the rural areas of the country. In a letter the Ministry directs that every Panchayat representative should get at least one training in a year.

Urban Local Bodies: Toothless Tigers


Sunil Kumar (name changed), former Sarpanch of a village in Gurgaon, who plans to be in the fray for the forthcoming elections of Municipal Corporation of Gurgaon (MCG), is a man grounded in reality. He knows his election to the Corporation would mean nothing to him or the electorate in his ward as the Corporation has no powers of its own and is at the beck and call of state administration in Chandigarh. At the most, entry into the first elected corporation would facilitate his access to the district administration and help him save the cash he otherwise would have been forced to donate for admission of his wards in elite schools.

Forget about being self-governed, the MCG, upgraded from a Council two and a half years back, does not even have control over water and sewerage, the most basic of the amenities which generally figure in the jurisdiction of most urban local bodies in the country. Even eight years after central government legislated 74th amendment advising the States to devolve 18 subjects to Nagar Panchayats, Municipal Councils and Municipal Corporations, in Gurgaon, State Public Health Department, Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) and Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) together administer the two subjects. Haryana State government, says R S Rathi, President Gurgaon Citizen Council, has not devolved many functions to the Urban Local Bodies (ULBs). “The corporations can only sanction projects costing up to Rs 5 million. For the rest, a Principal Secretary in Chandigarh issues orders. Even cleaning contracts for Gurgaon are cleared in Chandigarh,” Rathi, whose wife Rama Rani is set to contest from one of the 35 wards in the MCG polls, claims.

The scene in neighbouring Faridabad, where the Corporation has existed since 1994, is not encouraging either. The Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF), in fact, despite being the only municipality in the State to have been chosen under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), the Rs 6.6 billion-strong initiative of central government for a planned development of our cities, is far from being self-sustained. The State is yet to reform the property tax coverage and collection regime, a prerequisite for availing benefits under the JNNURM. Though on paper, Haryana has devolved 12 out of the 18 functions, which, according to 74th amendment, were to be transferred to the ULBs, in reality it amounts to nothing.

Non-Performers All the Way
Haryana does not even figure in the list of performer states, Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) drew up in October last year on the basis of status of devolution to the ULBs. The State has withheld crucial functions like urban planning, urban forestry, safeguarding the interests of weaker sections and handicapped and urban poverty among others from the local bodies. A brief of the MoUD on devolution says that ‘only eleven states - namely Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Kerala, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Tripura and West Bengal - have devolved some or most of the functions to the ULBs’.

Gujarat, MP, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh are the only states, which have transferred all 18 subjects. While Mizoram, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa have not devolved a single function to the ULBs, Nagaland and Uttarakhand have handed over four and nine subjects only. Except Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan and five other states, no State has devolved fire services to the urban bodies. Their argument is that the fire services would increase financial burden on the municipalities. The Northeastern states attribute non-transfer of functions to non-formation of ULBs, opposition from traditional institutions and capacity constraints of the ULBs. In Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh and Jharkhand, the elections for the ULBs are yet to take place.

JNNURM, a Slow Starter
The introduction of JNNURM, a programme that incentivises the reforms by linking release of funds to devolution to the ULBs, has not brought the desired outcome as a majority of the states has stonewalled the process. The Mission, launched for 2005-2012 in 63 cities, requires the state, cities and urban local bodies to undertake certain reforms to be eligible for grants under the scheme. While the States are supposed to rationalise stamp duty, enact public disclosure acts, ensure community participation in planning at local level, modify property taxes and computerise the process of registration, repeal of urban land, the ULBs are to adopt double entry system of accounting and e-governance. The States are also required to amend rent control and transfer planning for the cities to local bodies. Though only about 14 months remain for completion of the Mission, over half of the work is still to be done. According to M Ramachandran, former Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), only 18 States have legislated for community participation in local governance (formation of area sabha and ward committee in Municipal Corporation), 15 States have amended rent control and only 14 have transferred city planning to the ULBs.

Cocking a snook at JNNURM, Haryana along with Punjab introduced major exemptions under the property tax after the introduction of the Mission. The two states, in a way, defeated the very motive (of making ULBs financially self-sustainable) behind the tax reforms linked to allocations under the Mission. Most of the state governments have vacillated on formation of Metropolitan Planning Committees (MPCs) as not only will this mean devolution of power to the municipalities but also convert the city development agencies into technical arms of the latter. The states have exhibited similar lackadaisical approach towards recommendations of State Finance Commissions (SFCs).

More recently Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati gave a body blow to the statutory bodies in Uttar Pradesh when she decided to replace the direct election to indirect for ULB heads in the State.

SFC Advices Find No Takers
Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan and Punjab have provided for constitution of the MPCs but not done it. Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana on the other hand have not provided for the constitution of the MPCs in their acts. “Firstly the State administration does not allow formation of the committee. Somehow if it is formed, it does not hold meetings and is not allowed to plan. There are also states that proposed State Chief Minister’s name as president of the committee!” say sources in the MoUD. The SFCs on the other hand have remained only advisory bodies, which churn out advices but are not empowered to enforce them. For instance, almost all the SFCs have asked for devolution of tax sources like stamp duty, motor vehicles, electricity, entertainment, profession etc, but these continue to be with the state governments. A consequence of this is that the ULBs have huge imbalance of revenue and expenditure and look up to state governments for support. According to one estimate, municipalities get only 0.6% of the National Gross Domestic Product (NGDP) in spite of the fact that cities contribute 90% of the government revenue and 60% of the NGDP.

The formation of Area Sabha and Ward Committees under the JNNURM was looked upon as the first step for citizen participation in planning for development at the local level. It has remained a non-starter. While the Sabha is mandated to generate proposals for all capital and maintenance works, determine the priority of developmental works and forwards the same to the Ward Committee, the latter in turn reviews the proposals and recommends them to Zonal Commissioner for administrative sanction. Ironically, the ULBs have proved to be a major stumbling block in the formation of area sabhas and ward committees clearly showing how elected representatives conspire to deny self-rule to people! Hyderabad is probably the only city where community participation has really taken wings as Andhra Pradesh amended municipal laws last year to incorporate provisions of community participation law in functioning of the ULBs. 17 other states have legislated on community participation but only on paper. What further exposes the States’ mal-intention is that out of 527 infrastructure projects sanctioned under the JNNURM, only 81 have been completed.

13th CFC Links Grants to Performance
The MoUD now hopes that 13th Central Finance Commission will achieve on devolution what the JNNURM has failed to achieve. The Commission proposing to grant over Rs 231 billion during 2010-15 has around Rs 80 billion linked to states’ performance on devolution of powers to ULBs.

The Commission links introduction of i) audit system for all local bodies; ii) independent local body ombudsman; iii) electronic transfer of grants to local bodies within 5 days of receipt from the Central Government; iv) prescription of qualification for appointment in the State Finance Commission; v) enabling ULBs to levy property tax; vi) establishment of a property tax board; vii) disclosure of service standards in respect of water and sanitation etc; viii) fire hazard mitigation plan for million plus cities; and, ix) supplement for local bodies in the budget document - to the grants worth Rs 80 billion to be given under the Commission. In case a State fails to fulfill any of the 9 conditions, its grant will be withheld and distributed among the performing states.

The states are expected to submit their first report to the MoUD for the performance-linked grants under the 13th Central Finance Commission in March this year.
Besides the JNNURM and the 13th CFC, the MoUD has initiated a number of schemes to strengthen service delivery and governance in the ULBs. These include introduction of ‘Service Level Benchmarking’, ‘National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP)’, ‘Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Satellite Towns around Mega Cities’, support to ‘Pooled Finance Bonds’, ‘Centres of Excellence on Urban Development’ and ‘Public Private Partnership (PPP)’ in urban infrastructure sector.

1244 - Unwarranted Pessimism on UID By: Ashwini Kulkarni -Source - EPW

Unwarranted Pessimism on UID By: Ashwini Kulkarni Vol XLVI No.16 April 16, 2011
 
 Ashwini Kulkarni, Nashik, Post Graduation in Economics,
Worked with NGOs for last 15 years on rural development issues.


[Ashwini Kulkarni (pragati.abhiyan@gmail.com) works with the non-governmental organisation, Pragati Abhiyan, based in Nashik.]
 
Reetika Khera in “The UID Project and Welfare Schemes” (EPW, 26 February 2011) has opened a debate on the promise of the project of providing each Indian citizen a unique identification (uid) card. Specifically, she takes issue with the claim that the UID will facilitate the implementation of welfare schemes. It is a thought-provoking article but I do not share her extreme pessimism about the inability of the UID to improve the access of the poor to various welfare schemes and public services. Khera faults the UID for its likely failure to correct problems that it is not designed to correct and she under-appreciates the importance of the problems it will resolve.
 
The arguments here are based on my experiences in Maharashtra as an activist involved in trying to reduce corruption in the implementation of the National Rural 
Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) projects. First, there is great value in having a UID document for someone who does not have access to welfare schemes due to the unavailability of the necessary documents. It may be true that having a UID will not obviate the need for applying for a bank account, a ration card or a job card, assuming that the delivery mechanisms for the existing welfare schemes remain unchanged. However, most Indians do not have a driver’s licence or a passport or a PAN card or a proof of residence that can serve as a basis for even applying for other necessary documents. It is possible that in the future the UID could suffice as a single identity card for multiple schemes such as pension schemes, Janani Suraksha Yojana, etc.
 
NREGA
 
For NREGA projects in any village, a labourer needs to be resident of that village in order to obtain a job card. This poses problems for members of nomadic tribes who reside in a place for a few months and then move on. As it stands, they do not have job cards. With a UID, they can work wherever they are and they can have a bank account which is accessible anywhere.
 
Khera does not think that the UID is needed for financial inclusion. She says that the transition to wage payments through bank accounts has been largely complete. However, as the ranks of new cohorts of labour join the pool, more bank accounts have to be created. Any system that makes it easier to open bank accounts should be welcome. Note also that most of the NREGA projects are being undertaken in a few select states like Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan. In other states, NREGA projects are less widespread. In Maharashtra, which is considered to be a relatively developed state, we are having serious problems in opening bank accounts for the labourers. I believe that UID will facilitate the process.
 
PDS
 
Does UID have nothing to contribute to the functioning of the public distribution system (PDS)? Khera is correct in saying that the real issue in the PDS is in the criterion for defining the “poor” and the UID cannot solve that problem. But whichever way the poor are defined, there is also the practical problem of including them in the net. Consider the multitudes living under bridges and on footpaths in cities or consider the nomads in rural areas. Such transients can seldom take advantage of the PDS network. Why? They were not counted by any BPL survey for the lack of any document that would prove their residency.
 
Suresh Sawant has been working with Rationing Kruti Samiti (RKS), an organisation across Maharashtra involved in having the PDS implemented. He says “Getting the migrants and the homeless ration cards without documents is the biggest hurdle. And so when the UID was announced, I welcomed it. When an individual has an identity card, it should be possible to get a ration card for him or her.”
 
Let me briefly recount a few cases that make the same point: 
Consider a community of 300 families, mostly dalits, in Kombadbhuja village, Raigarh district. They have migrated from Marathwada to find work in a quarry. They have no voter cards, no ration cards, no birth certificates, no bank accounts…nothing to prove that they are Indian citizens. Their children cannot go to school, they have no access to any subsidised health benefits or to any subsidised foodgrains. 
They get nothing from the government. The quarry owner is their only link to the world. It is possible that a new airport will be built displacing them from their new homes. But they do not have any proof to demand rehabilitation package of any kind.
 
Consider next a group of Pardhis from Marathwada living under Vakola flyover, near Vakola police station, Mumbai. 
By any stretch of imagination it is difficult to call the place living quarters for anybody. But the group has been living there for two generations from before the flyover was built. There is no government scheme that can cover these people as they have no official address or identity.
 
There are innumerable people of this sort across India who are more vulnerable than most and who are in desperate need of government support. They need to be provided with a basic document that identifies them as citizens of India and therefore makes them entitled to certain privileges and support. Such a document should not depend on the mercy of a gramsevak or any other local functionary, who must certify a person as a bona fide recipient.
 
Khera concedes that “portability” is an indisputable advantage of the UID. She argues, however, that in the context of the PDS, portability does not mean much if the grain supplies do not match the population. In other words, the migrants can flash their ration cards which is pointless if there is not enough grain to meet their demand. This argument brings out the limitations of the PDS rather than of the UID.

1243 - Healthcare majors to form joint action group-Source-Express Buzz

24th April 2011

HYDERABAD: In order to ensure a safer and stronger healthcare system in the country, industry leaders from the sector will join hands to create a joint action management group and propogate the need for patient safety. The team will soon make a representation to the Unique Identification (UID) project to explore how the data can be integrated to provide healthcare services.
 
Healthcare service providers participating at the two-day event on Transforming Healthcare with IT 2011 have decided to form a national safety forum, with Quality Control of India, WHO and FICCI as part of its executive body besides members from the industry.
 
“The joint action group will conduct campaigns in nursing homes and hospitals propogating the need for patient safety. 

We also plan to launch a portal where resources related to patient safety can be shared,” said Sangeetha Reddy, executive director (operations), Apollo Hospitals group.
 
“We will make a representation to Nandan Nilekani, who’s heading the Unique Identification Number (UID) project, to try and see how the data can be integrated and thereby transform the process to offer healthcare services,” Reddy explained.
 
In his valedictory note, governor E S L Narasimhan said, “The critical question to be asked is whether healthcare is reaching the last mile. If not, why not?”
 
He asked if corporate hospitals could pool resources with a team of experts to conduct health camps in villages that would reduce travel time and cost for patients. He also underscored the need for providing medical services and medicines at affordable prices. “While there are initiatives such as Arogyasri for the poor and superspecialty hospitals for those who can afford, there needs to be something for people in between... Can we look at something like an ATM -- All Time Medical -- kiosk that can sell most-used medicines at fixed and affordable prices?” he asked.
 
He urged corporates to replicate Prathap  Reddy’s Aragonda experiment in Chittoor district, where a hospital was set up to offer service to villagers free of cost or at a nominal charge.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

1242 - Rafael Espinoza, Popular Cop, Is Illegal Immigrant: Officials-Source - Huffington Post


ANCHORAGE, Alaska — For years, the man known as Rafael Espinoza was widely respected as an exemplary police officer who was popular among his peers in Alaska's largest city.

All that ended this week when authorities discovered he was really Mexican national Rafael Mora-Lopez, who was in the U.S. illegally and stole another man's identity, officials charged.

"His reputation here is one of a hard-working officer, one who was very professional," Anchorage Police Chief Mark Mew said Friday at a news conference announcing Mora-Lopez's arrest. "The problem, obviously, is he is not Rafael Espinoza."

Soon after the announcement, Mora-Lopez appeared in U.S. District Court in Anchorage and pleaded not guilty to a charge of passport fraud, which carries a maximum 10-year sentence. At his arraignment, Mora-Lopez told a federal magistrate he is 47, even though officials listed his age as 51.

His attorney, Alan Dayan, declined to comment to The Associated Press.

Federal agents processing a renewal request for his passport discovered the alleged fraud. He was arrested Thursday after authorities searched his home and found documents confirming his true identity, officials said.

Mora-Lopez had been employed as an Anchorage police officer since 2005 under the assumed name. Police and federal prosecutors said he doesn't have a criminal record.

"We have no evidence that this individual had at the time been anything other than a good police officer," Karen Loeffler, U.S. Attorney in Alaska said.

The real Rafael Espinoza is a U.S. citizen who lives outside Alaska.

Officials said it's too soon to gauge implications of the case, such as any fallout over Mora-Lopez's court testimony in past criminal trials. Authorities released limited details, saying the case was still unfolding.

Mew said the department conducted a pre-employment criminal background check on Mora-Lopez and he also passed a polygraph test. A national fingerprint check also turned up empty.

The arrest was a "bitter pill to swallow" for many in the police department, Mew said.

There are no immediate plans to file state charges, said John Skidmore, a state attorney. He and other officials stressed that the case was still under investigation.

"At this time, we have no reason to believe, from what we know so far, that this gentleman or this officer's good work for APD has in any way been compromised or questioned," Skidmore said.

U.S. Magistrate John D. Roberts set bond at $50,000, and ordered Mora-Lopez to home-confinement and electronic monitoring. His defense attorney told the magistrate that Mora-Lopez has a wife and child in Alaska and has close ties to Anchorage, where he has lived since the late 1980s.

"He's not going anywhere," Dayan said.

The wife could not be reached by phone for comment Friday.

The passport fraud case is similar to one involving a Mexican national who took the identity of a dead cousin who was a U.S. citizen in order to become a Milwaukee police officer. Oscar Ayala-Cornejo was deported to Mexico in 2007.

1241 - Temporary Data Center for UID scheme in Bangalore-Source- Governance now

The Karnataka state government has sanctioned Rs 139 crore for establishing a temporary Data Center in the city to implement the Unique Identification Card scheme.
 
PTI | APRIL 22 2011

The State government today sanctioned Rs 139 crore for establishing a temporary Data Center in the city to implement the Unique Identification Card scheme.

A cabinet meeting chaired by Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa sanctioned the fund for establishing the Center, Minister for Higher Education, V S Acharya, told reporters.

The UID scheme was taken up in two districts on a pilot basis and later in eight districts. It would now be taken up in 20 districts, he said.

Detailing other projects approved by the Cabinet, Acharya said it approved the proposal to recruit 75 retired veterinary doctors on contract basis to cover the shortage in its veterinary hospitals.

Recently the government recruited 287 veterinary doctors, of which only 211 reported for duty.

1240 - UID for inclusion - NDTV Interview- You Tube

1239 - A Picture that tells a thousand stories!! - Source - Inclusion

   
Nandan Nilekani
MAY 18, 2010


UIDAI Chairman Nandan Nilekani during a press conference regarding government's approval for adoption of uniform and standardised approach for collection of demographic and biometric attributes for UID project, in New Delhi.

- PTI PHOTO/VIJAY KUMAR JOSHI

1238 - The India Decade - Nandan Nilekani - Source - Inclusion

The India Decade

How the UID can Make Growth Inclusive

The Unique Identity Number project will enable the poor to access important resources and services hitherto denied to them, partly due to their invisibility and partly because of the leakage and fraud that have become an inherent part of our system, says Nandan Nilekani

Is the coming decade ‘India’s decade’? Substantial change is elusive to see when you are in the same place for years at a time, but for a visitor, it can be startling. Across India, in our cities, smaller towns and increasingly our villages, what we are now seeing is a burgeoning of economic activity - greater investment, more jobs, and rising economic activity that is visible in the hustle and bustle of our local markets and mandis. The ground reality thus seems to confirm the upward trajectory of our growth figures. There are certainly qualifiers to this - our growth remains visibly uneven across states, and the issues of unaddressed inequality, poverty and illiteracy persist. But there are clearly immense possibilities emerging for us in the opportunities to better our social indicators, drive industry growth and urban expansion and create jobs.

The Unique Identity Number (UID) project will play a fundamental role in shaping these possibilities. The goal of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is an ambitious, but simply stated objective: issue a unique identity number for every resident in the country. The impact of this move, however, is likely to be broad-ranging over the next decade and will permanently change how we tackle poverty and how we approach our welfare programmes, service delivery and development and governance in India.

The UIDAI and its impact

Over the past several months, the UIDAI has held consultations with a broad list of government bodies as well as civil society and private sector organisations. Although, the people we met were from different sectors, with varying goals and challenges, their concerns overlapped when it came to identity. For government programmes as well as public and private agencies in finance, insurance, energy, education, health, labour and so on, the difficulty they face in verifying the identity of residents affects the delivery of services, the success of welfare schemes and the ease with which residents can access the resources they are entitled to.

The digitisation that the unique identity number (UID) brings to identity verification will replace a vast paper-based system that had long established itself across India’s service infrastructure. The number can enable the targeted delivery of services and prevent leakage and fraud in government programmes. In the longer term, the UID number also has the potential to transform how we address our development challenges.

In particular, the UID has significant implications in how we tackle poverty. For a long time, our governments have worked to address poverty issues by delivering to the poor basic essentials - such as food to feed their family, fertiliser to grow their crops, and fuel to cook and to light their homes. But poverty is less about mere shortage and more about systemic exclusion and lack of access. The poor, for example, lack the resources to build the skills they need to earn a higher wage. They cannot access the facilities to give their children proper healthcare or the right schools to educate them. They cannot avail of the markets that will earn them higher prices for their goods.

Everywhere they turn, they find important resources and services denied to them, partly due to their invisibility - given the difficulty of the state to identify who and where these residents are, and how to reach resources to them without leakage and fraud. The absence of such access has created a large, unstable and inefficient informal economy that the poor rely on for basic services, turning to slumlords for housing, moneylenders for finance, unregulated schools for education and the informal sector for jobs.

UID across the lifecycle of services

The UID number will help us address these challenges - a clear, transparent identity system will enable residents to avail of resources and services that have long been out of their reach. The number can open up access for the poor to a lifecycle of services, and such access can be tailored to an individual’s age, their socio-economic group and their particular needs. For example, the child of a BPL (Below Poverty Line) family can be eligible for healthcare vouchers linked to the child’s UID number, enabling the child to receive free immunisations from any hospital. The BPL family can also be eligible for UID-linked direct cash transfers, which will allow them to purchase basic necessities such as food and clothing for their children and family.

Once a child enters school, UID-linked education vouchers will allow him/her to attend the school of choice. As an adult worker, UID-linked access to finance and insurance will encourage savings and investment into entrepreneurial ideas. A mobile identity, with mobile rights and entitlements, will also enables the resident as an adult to migrate with greater security and safety, in order to get the best possible income and to contribute most effectively to the economy. And during periods of unemployment, reliable, UID-linked welfare schemes will ensure a subsistence wage and access to pension in old age will ensure a level of security.

Linking the UID across the lifecycle of services will make governments far more accountable to individuals in the benefits they receive, and their entitlements. And it will enable new, targeted investments into human capital, which will in the long term, provide us with an important fillip to growth.

The UID number, by tackling these challenges in access, helps address the shift in aspirations that have accompanied India’s development over the last two decades. In the 1970s and 1980s, people’s aspirations had focused on basic essentials - roti, kapda, aur makaan (food, clothes and a house). Since the reforms in the 1990s, the emphasis moved to community infrastructure, in the form of bijli, sadak and paani (electricity, roads and water). In recent years, as growth has accelerated and access to basic infrastructure has improved further, aspirations among the poor have shifted again. The focus today is on ‘soft’ infrastructure that empowers the individual, and the demand is for a ‘bank account, mobile phone, and identity’. Each of these is something the poor aspire to for their ability to improve the access to resources and markets.

The possibilities of the UID

During discussions UIDAI officials and I have had with organisations and people across the country, one thing that soon became apparent was the sustained interest in the UID Authority’s proposed biometric system. Many have appreciated the accuracy it will bring to identity verification; some expressed their concern on how this will impact privacy and increase the visibility of residents to the state. But the reality is that such visibility goes both ways - a clear identity system vastly increases the accountability of both public and private agencies to the resident, and it becomes difficult to deny the resident services they are entitled to. Biometrics-linked authentication, for example, will make it very difficult for service providers to deliver resources and benefits to those who are not eligible for them. A UID-linked system at an NREGS worksite, for instance, will require workers to verify their presence onsite through biometrics. The wages that are due to them can be transferred directly to a UID-linked bank account, from where money can be withdrawn only through UID authentication.

Reliable identity authentication also makes it easier to deliver public resources and benefits through a variety of agencies - public, private, and non-profit. Once identity verification is mobile and easily done, benefits can be delivered directly to the resident in the form of vouchers and cash, which can then be redeemed at any agency.

The ability of individuals to verify themselves anywhere in the country also becomes valuable as migration and urbanisation intensify with growth. The UID number, with its ‘anytime, anywhere, anyhow’ online verification process, can make geographical distances irrelevant to the delivery of a multitude of services, allowing agencies across a variety of sectors such as banking and finance to provide remote services.

Building a ‘public-owned’ project

Considering the broad implications of the UID project, the UID Authority has encouraged widespread public participation in the crafting of its policies and implementation strategy. The UIDAI has, for example, consulted with a wide range of organisations on the proposed number, and sought their perspectives - this has included governmental agencies, including central ministries and departments, and state governments, civil society organisations, educational institutes, private agencies such as banks, microfinance institutions and industry groups, and multilateral agencies, including the UNDP and the World Bank. The Authority is also setting up advisory groups, including the awareness and communication strategy advisory council and the global academia council, which includes concerned citizen representatives, to recommend steps for engaging and enrolling the public in the UIDAI process.

Creating a transparent approach to UID implementation and encouraging the broad involvement of the public will be key to having an identity system that is well-designed, secure and effective. The Authority is not restricting such involvement to experts and skilled professionals - it plans to build a broad-based volunteer force of ordinary residents from across the country who will aid the UIDAI in the implementation of the number, help spread the message on its benefits and pinpoint emerging challenges and issues with its implementation.

An initiative of this scale is certainly unprecedented in India and all the more of a challenge considering the size and diversity of the country’s geography, and the difficulties in reaching marginal communities. The UID can be the beginning of a new charter for development in India. It has the potential for us to leapfrog an entire generation in terms of development and the delivery of services. It can become a way to bridge the distances that exist between our political and economic structures and the poor. And it can transform, how we approach the implementation of governance projects in India, embracing an approach that is potentially more participative and collaborative. If we do this right, we are at the cusp of reforms that can fundamentally change the lives of all Indians.

Nandan Nilekani is Chairman, Unique Identification Authority of India

 

1237 - The Power of Identity by Nandn Nilekani - Source- Inclusion

The Power of Identity


In a world of global flows of wealth, power, and images,the search for identity-collective or individual, ascribed or constructed-becomes the fundamental source of social meaning, says  Nandan Nilekani
It succinctly reflects the power of identity1 in today's world and this is no way more evident than in India where thousands are denied basic rights and benefits due to the lack of an identity. The UID (unique identification number, now known as Aadhaar) project2 is a critical component of the inclusive growth that we all seek. If India is going to achieve economic prosperity as well as social equality, we not only have to grow but we have to grow along a path where people are not left behind in the process of change. Identity would be an important aspect in achieving this. A national identification number or National Identity Card number is used by the governments of many countries as a means of providing their citizens, permanent residents, and temporary residents with services in the areas of work, taxation, government benefits, health care, and other governmentrelated functions. The ways in which such a system is implemented varies between countries, but in most cases, an individual is issued a number at birth or when they reach a legal age (typically the age of 18).

In Chile, for instance, the National Identification Number is called RUN (Rol Único Nacional). It is used as a national identification number, tax payer number, social insurance number, passport number, driver 's licence number, for employment, etc. It is also commonly used as a customer number in banks, retailers, insurance companies, airlines, etc.

Since 2004, every newborn baby has a RUN number; before it was assigned at the moment of applying to get the ID card. Non-Chilean residents also get a RUN and an identification card. In China, an ID card is mandatory for all citizens who are over 16 years old. The 18-digit ID card is used for residential registration, army enrolment, registration of marriage/divorce, going abroad, taking part in various national exams, and other social or civil matters.

In Denmark, a Personal Identification Number called a "CPR" number is used in dealings with public agencies, from health care to the tax authorities. It is also commonly used as a customer number in banks and insurance companies.3

In the United States, people have been getting Social Security Numbers for decades. In 1936, the Social Security Administration established the Social Security Number to track worker's earnings for social security benefit purposes. Despite its narrowly intended purpose, the SSN is now used for a myriad of non-Social Security purposes. Today, SSNs are used, in part, as identity verification tools for services such as child support collections, law enforcement enhancements, and issuing credit to individuals.

In India, the purpose of the UID project is very simple; it is to give every Indian resident a unique number, preventing the kinds of duplication that currently exists. The complexity of the issue lies in ensuring that everybody in a population of 1.2 billion gets a unique number, and therein lies an enormous challenge of scale and technology. But issuing a unique number is just one part of the challenge. The other part is making sure that this number is used effectively. For this purpose, the UIDAI (Unique Identification Authority of India) is providing an online authentication capability. In such a scenario, we will be able to verify online anyone claiming to be Mr. XYZ with the unique number 123 as actually being that person. This combination of de-duplication and having unique numbers on one end, and the existence of online authentication at the other end is the core of the solution that the UIDAI is seeking to achieve.

Now, what is the advantage of this? What does the issuance of a number mean in terms of inclusion? The Aadhaar has several important ramifications, the effects of which will be far-reaching. The first is that an Aadhaar will give a person a recognised identity. It is not that people do not have any identity today, but the number will give identity with respect to the State. For people already having driver licences, passports, bank accounts, credit cards and PAN cards, this probably means little. But there are a few hundred million people in the country who face a lot of challenges in proving their identity. They do not have birth certificates; many of them have not gone to schools and, therefore, they do not have school certificates; and there are 75 million homeless families who do not have an address. Without these documents, and when you do not have an address, you have no real, documentary proof of who you are. This failure to prove one's identity denies many facilities to our citizens. For example, if one wants to get a mobile phone today, then one has to go through what is known as the KYC (know your customer) process. Here, the mobile company will actually check and verify an applicant's identity. But for people who have no such documentary proof of identity, it is very difficult to access a mobile phone connection. Similarly, if somebody goes to a bank to open an account, he is unable to do so unless he goes through the bank's KYC process. This absence of an effective identity infrastructure has also been sharply felt by both government and service providers.

In the last few years, we have had significant increases in our social welfare spending, and we have a large number of initiatives that go towards giving benefits to the poor. However, the effectiveness of these efforts are limited due to the problem of proving identity, and reaching these services across the last mile. This becomes particularly important since we are now in a period of rapid economic growth. Such growth can only be inclusive if people across the country have similar levels of access to the opportunities, 36 Building from the Bottom and resources from economic development. The lack of identity however, again limits many millions from accessing the jobs, the opportunities for education, better financial resources, and the chances for entrepreneurship that emerge out of India's growth.

   
For a population of over one billion, uniqueness of the biometric data is important. It is only then a unique number can be allocated to each resident. The project would be collecting the biometrics of all 10 fingers, face, as well as the iris image of both eyes. Fingerprint biometrics is being collected to ensure easy biometric authentication-the individual would just have to put their thumb on the biometric reader. Iris is being collected as an additional biometric because it can ensure inclusion of the poor- whose fingerprints often get worn out due to physical labour-and to ensure inclusion of children, whose iris images stabilise even as infants, even though their finger biometrics become stable only at the age of 16. Capturing the iris image also helps ensure the uniqueness of the number, since collecting multiple biometrics lowers the chances of errors.

India is not the first country to link identity with biometrics on a national scale. Many countries around the world are using biometrics as basis for identification of citizens. Brazilian citizens have had user ID cards since the beginning of the 20th century. The decision by the Brazilian government to adopt fingerprint-based biometrics was spearheaded by Dr. Felix Pacheco4 at Rio de Janeiro, at that time capital of the Federative Republic. Dr. Pacheco was a friend of Dr. Juan Vucetich,5 who invented one of the most complete 10-print classification systems in existence. The Vucetich system was adopted not only in Brazil, but also by most of the other South American countries. The oldest and most traditional ID Institute in Brazil (Instituto de Identificação Félix Pacheco) was integrated at DETRAN6-(Brazilian equivalent to DMV) into the civil and criminal AFIS7 system in 1999.

The Benefits of Aadhaar
There are clearly benefits from a mechanism that uniquely identifies a person, and ensures instant identity verification. The need to prove identity only once will bring down transaction costs for the poor. A clear identity number would also transform the delivery of social welfare programmes by making them more inclusive of communities now cut off from such benefits due to their lack of identification. It would enable the government to shift from indirect to direct benefits, and help verify whether the intended beneficiaries actually receive funds/subsidies. A single, universal identity number will also be transformational in eliminating fraud and duplicate identities, since individuals will no longer be able to represent themselves differently to different agencies.

A case in point is banking. To mitigate the lack of financial access in India, the regulator has focused on improving the reach of financial services in new and innovative ways-through no-frills accounts, the liberalization of banking and ATM policies, and branchless banking with business correspondents (BCs), which enables local intermediaries such as self-help groups (SHGs) and kirana stores to provide banking services. Related efforts have also included the promotion of core-banking solutions in Regional Rural Banks (RRBs); and the incorporation of the National Payment Corporation of India (NPCI) to provide a national infrastructure for payments and settlements in the country.

    
Advancements in technology such as core banking, ATMs, and mobile connectivity have also had enormous impact on banking. Mobile phones in particular present an enormous opportunity in spreading financial services across India. These technologies have reduced the need for banks to be physically close to their customers, and banks have been consequently able to experiment with providing services through internet as well as mobile banking. These options, in addition to ATMs, have made banking accessible and affordable for many urban non-poor residents across the country.

With the poor, however, banks face a fundamental challenge that limits the success of technology and banking innovations. The lack of clear identity documentation for the poor creates difficulties in establishing their identity to banks. This has also limited the extent to which online and mobile banking can be leveraged to reach these communities.

Therefore, identity enables firstly, access to a variety of services- including public services, financial access, to banking or other financial products-to almost all services.

The second thing that identity enbles along with online authentication capability, is in providing reach. Reach is very important because if one really wants to promote inclusive growth then we have to reach the number to every corner of the country. Because we have identity authentication being done online, and given the growing connectivity across the country, we can now use the mobile network to authenticate one's identity. This will enable us to reach the millions of people who live in our villages. Even today, for example, only six per cent of our villages have bank branches and therefore there are a large number of people whom we are not able to provide financial services to, simply because we do not have the financial infrastructure to do it. Therefore, giving us the reach to bring such financial and other services to every part of the country, through a combination of networking and UID, will be an important part of inclusion. Whether the person is living in urban Delhi or whether he is living in a remote village in Orissa, he would then be able to use the same set of services.

The next important thing that Aadhaar will enable is mobility. Indians are a very mobile people. Today people leave their villages and travel long distances to get jobs. We know that we have a huge migrant population because economic opportunity is not necessarily available everywhere and therefore people have to travel and uproot themselves and go elsewhere. For the poor, such migration is not easy to do today. For example, today you have a migrant who comes from Chhattisgarh. He has no identity in the city even though he may have some proof back in his village. But, because he does not have that proof in the city, he is not able to get a ration card or open a bank account or get a mobile phone.

However, because Aadhaar is a national number-a number which is portable across the country-it will enable authentication of one's identity regardless of where the person is. People will not lose their services and their support systems when they migrate from their homes. This will in turn, aid mobility-mobility for better jobs, better education and better opportunities.

Intrinsic to this is the whole issue of efficiency in public spending. In its Economic Survey for 2009-10, the finance ministry has acknowledged that "in spite of increased government outlays in the sector in recent years, lack of identity proof results in harassment and denial of basic services to the poor and marginalised. As a result, there are still leakages in the programmes/schemes and benefits do not reach the intended groups of individuals in full.8"

Arguing that ensuring identity proof to the intended beneficiaries was crucial to the success of these schemes, the Survey pointed out that this could be achieved through Aadhaar numbers. "Providing identity proof to the poor through the UIDAI will enable smoother delivery of direct benefits to the underserved. Specifically it will improve the delivery of the flagship schemes of the Centre and will prevent leakages as well as wastages in their implementation," the Survey noted.

 We know that due to our growing emphasis on improving welfare for the poor, we are set to spend a lot of money on various social programmes in the coming years. In the last 10 years, we have significantly raised our social spending. This year, the budget for the Natioanl Rural Employment Guarantee Act9 (NREGA) is Rs. 41,000 crore, for Indira Awas Yojana10 (IAY) Rs. 15,000 crore and for Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan11 (SSA) Rs. 15,000 crore. As we have more social programmes, and various rights-right to food, right to education, right to work-get provided for within our welfare schemes we will see spending increase further. This expenditure is ultimately spent on individuals, on beneficiaries. Today, however, because of fundamental problems in confirming the identity of beneficiaries, we have not been successful in reaching benefits to the people who deserve it. The databases are such that there are large numbers of inclusion, as well as exclusion errors. A large number of people are claiming more than their share of public benefits, and there are large numbers of ghosts-people who do not exist but in whose name benefits are being claimed. At the same time, you have millions of deserving people who are not in the system because they do not have any identity. The NCAER (National Council of Applied Economic Research) has estimated for example, that there are over 12 million poor left out from the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS).

Reducing these errors and increasing efficiency of public services is a very critical government requirement, especially as we are going to spend more on subsidies for public services. The challenge here is how do we make sure that these benefits reach the right person, and how do we make sure that the truly deserving get the benefit. The Aadhaar will enable us to clearly identify the person receiving a public benefit.

The impact of identifying beneficiaries more effectively would be useful, for instance, within the Public Distribution System or PDS.12 The unique number can share the burden of PDS reform by assisting in the positive identification of individuals and families. This can lead to a high-quality beneficiary database without duplicate and ghost cards, improving the targeting of benefits. Aadhaar will also create an ecosystem for easy implementation of PDS reforms in the long term, like direct benefits transfer. The Aadhaar database can also be used by the PDS system for confirmation of subsidy offtakes by the resident through authentication of the beneficiary's Aadhaar. The efficiency improvements in the PDS system will make it one of the best-run pro-poor schemes in the country. Together, it is a win-win for residents and the Government.

Today, every time an individual tries to access a benefit or service, they must undergo a full cycle of identity verification. Different service providers also often have different requirements in the documents they demand, the forms that require filling out, and the information they collect on the individual. Such duplication of effort and 'identity silos' increase overall costs of identification, and cause extreme inconvenience to the individual. This approach is especially unfair to India's poor and underprivileged residents, who usually lack identity documentation, and find it difficult to meet the costs of multiple verification processes.

Then there is the question of choice. Choice means that I, as a resident of India, should be able to choose who is my service provider for a service. For those in urban India, such choice already exists; if one does not like a mobile company's service, one can buy a mobile service from another vendor. Tomorrow with local number portability, one will also not have to worry about changing one's number. But when it comes to public services, we see that residents lack any choice in the agency from whom they can access the service. If one is on the PDS list, one can only go to one fair price shop. If one has a health record in one's village, one can only visit one ANM (Auxiliary Nurse Mid-Wife) or Asha13 worker to get health services. If there is only one public school in the village, it is the only one that a child can attend. In other words, the poor are denied choice because they have to go to only one provider. When you do not have a choice in public services, then the negotiating power is with your service provider.

Aadhaar will enable people to have a choice; a choice that essentially transfers the negotiating power from the supplier to the customer. This in turn, enables a levelling of opportunity between the rich and the poor. Today we have seen that across India, different people have different levels of opportunity, depending for example, on the state they live in, the community they belong to, and their levels of education. Is there a way with technology to make sure that the rich and the poor, the urban and the rural, the educated and the uneducated all of them have the same access to opportunity, can we level the playing field for them? This is the focus of what the UIDAI is seeking to achieve.

A corollary of this is accountability in government spending. Essentially the audit trails and the financial transaction trails that the number will enable one to figure out where the money is going. This will make expenditure management more transparent, bringing in greater accountability. Aadhaar is fundamental to the way we will deliver public services, fundamental to the way we deliver financial inclusion, fundamental to the way we bring in efficiency of subsidies. If 30 years back, we talked about roti, kapda, aur makaan (food, clothing and shelter) and in the last 10 years we have talked about bijli, sadak, paani, which is infrastructure (power, roads and water), then in the next 10 years, it is going to be about bank accounts, mobile numbers and Aadhaar. All the three are abstract ideas but all of them are tools of empowerment, access, opportunity, and inclusion.

Identity can be the door that will open other doors. Identity enables access to services, like getting a mobile phone or opening a bank account. Identity proof is required to make sure one gets the PDS ration and it is required to get school admission. So, fundamentally an identity enables greater access. As a child, it may be required to get immunisation, as a young student, it is required to get admission or scholarship, as an adult, it is required to get a job. Thus when you look at the whole lifecycle of a person, identity is required at every point.

It is for this reason that we decided to rename the UID as Aadhaar. We wanted a name that had a national appeal, could be recognised across the country and resonate in different languages, besides being easy to remember and say. The 12-digit unique number will be the 'Aadhaar' or foundation through which the citizen can claim his/her rights and entitlements throughout their lifecycle, from a variety of agencies, for a variety of services. We are going to have 800 million people in our workforce by 2020. In order to ensure that they are a source of valuablehuman capital, we must connect them effectively to the services they need in health, education and employment. The number will enable us to implement our long-held vision of 'development with a human face', where people across the country are able to interact with more responsive, accessible institutions and agencies, and where we can move forward on a more inclusive path to growth.

Nandan Nilekani is Chairman, Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)

Select References

1,  Castells, Manuel (1997, second edition, 2004). "The Power of Identity", The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. II. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. " India Undertakes Ambitious ID Card Plan," New York Times, 25th June 2009.…Policy makers see a national ID card as critical to improving the delivery of social services, subsidies and other government programs while also strengthening national security. The Indian government and outside observers have shown that the majority of aid earmarked for the poor does not reach them, and it is hard for the government to detect embezzlement and misuse of funds. If administered properly, experts say a universal ID card could help ensure that most of the billions India and other organizations spend on aid reaches the people for whom it was intended. Today, Indians use a variety of documents to prove their identities, like state-issued driver's licenses, ration cards used for food purchases at government-run stores and a tax identification card that is akin to the American Social Security card…http:// www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/ world/asia/26india.html?_r=1&ref=global-home
3.  The Civil Registration System in Denmark, Det Centrale Personregister, http:// www.cpr.dk/cpr/ site.aspx? p=303
4.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biometrics
5.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Vucetich. Also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Fingerprinting
6.  http://www.detran.rj.gov.br/_documento.asp?cod=1438
7.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_fingerprint_identification
8.  Economic Survey, 2009-10. Ministry of Finance, Government of India, available at http:// indiabudget.nic.in/es2009-10/esmain.htm
9.  The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act aims at enhancing the livehood security of people in rural areas by guaranteeing 100 days of wageemployment in a financial year to a rural household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. More details at http://www.nrega.nic.in/netnrega/home.aspx
10.  The objective of IAY is primarily to help construction of dwelling units by members of Scheduled Castes and also Non-Scheduled Castes rural poor living below the poverty line. From the year 1999-2000, it has been decided to earmark 80 per cent to total allocated funds for construction of new houses and 20 per cent funds for upgradation of Kachha unserviceable houses. As per guidelines, tallest 60 per cent of assistance should go in favour of Scheduled Castes beneficiaries under this schemes. More details at http:// bharatnirman.gov.in/housing.html
11.  Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) is Government of India's flagship programme for achievement of Universalisation of Elementary Education (UEE) in a time-bound manner, as mandated by 86th amendment to the Constitution of India making free and compulsory education to the children of 6-14 years age group, a fundamental right. SSA is being implemented in partnership with state governments to cover the entire country and address the needs of 192 million children in 1.1 million habitations. The programme seeks to open new schools in those habitations which do not have schooling facilities and strengthen existing school infrastructure through provision of additional class rooms, toilets, drinking water, maintenance grant and school improvement grants. More details at http://ssa.nic.in/
12.  With a network of more than 400,000 Fair Price Shops (FPS), the Public Distribution System (PDS) in India is perhaps the largest distribution machinery of its type in the world. PDS is said to distribute each year commodities worth more than Rs. 15,000 crore to about 16 crore families. More details at http://fcamin.nic.in/dfpd/ EventListing.asp?Section=PDS&id_pk=1&ParentID=0
13.  One of the key strategies under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) is having a Community Health Worker i.e. ASHA (Accredited Social Health Activist)-a trained female community health specialist-for every village with a population of 1000. Selected from the village itself and accountable to it, the ASHA will be trained to work as an interface between the community and the public health system. More details at http://mohfw.nic.in/NRHM.htm