In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, December 9, 2011

2050 - Aadhaar project uncertainties unnerves technology vendors-Hindu Businessline

Moumita Bakshi Chatterjee


A man registering his identity with iris scanning on a digital machine for obtaining "Aadhaar" 
during the 
Proof of Concept phase of the
 Unique Identification Authority of India Project 

Industry observers concede that differences within the Government over the execution of the project should have been resolved much before the project was flagged off.


The firestorm of controversies around Aadhaar project – including the latest buzz that a Parliamentary panel may suggest withdrawal of the National Identification Authority of India Bill in its present form –have put IT vendors involved in the project in a bind.

The Aadhaar project rides heavily on technology and IT services blocks such as consulting, application development & maintenance, contact centre services, biometric solutions and training services.

But simmering differences within the Government over the implementation of the project, Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI's) future enrolment mandate and funding have raised worries. IT vendors rue the uncertainties surrounding the project but are hopeful that the project will not be derailed given the social benefits (plugging of leakages by linking Aadhaar numbers with welfare schemes).

“If the project comes under a cloud, it will be a disaster. However, it is not likely to translate into a financial loss for us as a vendor, because we have valid contracts in place which surely will be honoured,” says Mr Rostow Ravanan, Chief Financial Officer of MindTree. Last year, MindTree had bagged a contract to provide application development and maintenance services for the Aadhaar project.

Emphasising that the project itself was a global technological showcase given its sheer scale, Mr Ravanan said, “If these technologies are not utilised for the benefit of the masses, it will pour cold water over an exciting opportunity.”

A senior official of a large Indian IT company – that is in the race for UIDAI's much-delayed Managed Services Provider contract – said that even if a Parliamentary Committee was to recommend tweaking of the Bill, it would not mean an end for the project, per se. “But yes, it will extend the timelines,” admitted the official, who did not wish to be named.

Industry observers concede that differences within the Government over the execution of the project should have been resolved much before the project was flagged off.

“India has not yet come to a stage of institutionalised e-governance roll out. Even today, the progress of e-Government projects closely track the initiative and energy of individual officials,” he added.

Controversies galore

The Aadhaar project has been riddled by a spate of controversies. There have been differences between UIDAI and the Home Ministry over the issue of enrolment beyond the current mandate of 20 crore. Besides, Registrar General of India and UIDAI have locked horns on whether the Aadhaar data can be used for the National Population Register. The Census Commissioner has reportedly declined to take UIDAI's data citing the absence of verification of those who are enrolling.

IT companies that Business Line spoke to concede that a lot of investments have already flowed into execution of various components of the project.

“It is not only the capital…massive manpower has been mobilised to collect data from the field. Of course, everyone is concerned…No one knows what will happen post March 2012,” says a senior official of another IT company that is involved in enrollments.

When contacted, Mr R.S. Sharma, Director-General of UIDAI, said he was not aware of the view taken by the Parliament's Standing Committee on Finance on Thursday, and hence would not comment.

Asked about the ramification of the ongoing controversies on the project roll-out, Mr Sharma said, “For vendors it is only a question of who will do the enrollments… Enrollments will continue to happen at the ground level no matter whichever agency ultimately does it. And it will happen on the platforms and technology, the same UID standards…so I do not think there is any reason for the industry to get worried over the issue.”