In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, December 30, 2011

2155 - UID-linked pay for NREGA begins in Hazaribag - TOI

Jaideep Deogharia, TNN | Dec 29, 2011, 07.09AM IST

RANCHI: It could be a mere coincidence or strategy of senior officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) that the trial run for retail payment, including payment of wages for MGNREGA, old age pension and scholarships, has been started in Hazaribag district, the home constituency of chairman of the parliamentary standing committee of finance Yashwant Sinha.

A committee has opined against the National Identification Authority of India Bill 2010 and has urged the Centre to review the UID scheme and bring forth a fresh legislation before Parliament. The UIDAI started functioning by an executive order of the planning department which empowered it to work as an attach office of the Planning Commission. However the Centre decided to legislate to make it a statutory body and brought forward the NIAI bill 2010. The bill was referred to the 21-member standing committee of finance headed by Sinha who expressed apprehensions about the bill particularly with respect to security of data and misuse of the Aadhaar number by residents in India who are not citizens.

Despite the recommendations of the standing committee and notes of dissent by three members Congress national spokesperson Raashid Alvi, Sikkim MP Prem Das Rai and Tamil Nadu MP Manicka Tagore the authority is going ahead with its project in the same speed so as to demonstrate the objectives practically instead of countering the apprehensions in theory.

A high-level team of the UIDAI under the leadership of assistant director general P K Upadhyay is camping in Hazaribag to oversee the process of the trial. Under the trial, MGNREGA workers enrolled with the UID scheme and who have already been issued Aadhaar numbers have been assisted in opening bank account whereas those having bank accounts have been simply linked with their Aadhar numbers. "Now the beneficiary can access his or her account directly by simply giving his Aadhar number," said a senior official of UID who was on a field trial in Hazaribag on Wednesday.

The online verification began in Jharkhand earlier this month at Ratu block of Ranchi district and is currently being carried out in Katkumsandi and Sadar block of Hazaribag districts to be followed by Chandil block in Saraikela district, the home constituency of chief minister Arjun Munda.

Asked about the efficacy of project being implemented without Parliament giving its nod to the NIAI Bill 2010, a senior official of UIDAI said the authority continued to function under the executive order of the department of planning and the bill only aims at giving more teeth and ease of work to the authority.

Independent MP from Jharkhand Inder Singh Namdhari admitted that as the issues raised the standing committee, the Centre must be cautious about bringing a strong legislation so that the immigrants from neighbouring countries don't start misusing the Aadhar number for their benefits. He, however, ruled out the idea of scrapping or rejecting the UID project. "We are waiting for the government to come up with an improved and revised bill considering the recommendations of the standing committee as well as the notes of dissent," he said.

Congress MP Shakil Ahmed said the concept was praised by people across political affiliations and the recommendations of the standing committee was little surprising for them. "We want a general consensus and if the UIDAI is trying to prove its point by practical demonstration of its efficacy, everyone would be relieved of the apprehensions," he said.