In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, December 9, 2011

2063 - House panel kills 3 key reform bills - TOI

Dec 9, 2011, 05.11AM IST

NEW DELHI: In a major setback to the UPA government still smarting from the FDI in multi-brand retail fiasco, Congress MPs joined opposition members in Parliament's standing committee on finance to reject three major bills relating to unique identification numbers, banking and insurance on Thursday.

The finance panel felt the UID Authority suffered from serious deficiencies over duplication of work with the registrar of census while it turned down the banking bill seeking to give investors in banks voting rights commensurate with their shares instead of the 10% cap at present.

The committee felt voting rights could be increased to 26% and no further while with regard to insurance, it felt there was no case to revise the foreign investment limit from 26% to 49% as proposed by the government. There was hardly a murmur of dissent with only Congress MP Rashid Alvi suggesting the UID bill be returned to government and not rejected.

The concurrence of Congress MPs on the panel with the reports is revealing as it points to a nervousness about FDI in various sectors in the ruling party at a time when the Manmohan Singh government is keen to beat back the "policy paralysis" charge with some vigorous reforms.

However, the Congress leadership remains committed to the UID scheme, with Rahul Gandhi telling a delegation on Thursday that UID would help in funds reaching the intended beneficiaries and also check corruption.

Apart from Alvi, Congress MPs on the panel include K S Siva Rao, Sambasiva Rayapati, Magunta Reddy, Sathyanarayana Sarvey, Dharam Singh, Manicka Tagore, Anjan Yadav, Jawaharlal Darda and K V P Rao. A Left MP submitted a note demanding that voting rights of investors in bank remain at 10%.

While the government has the option to reject the reports, it will find it hard to ensure passage of the bills in Rajya Sabha where the BJP and Left can come together to block the legislations. The lack of enthusiasm within the Congress will also be a source of concern for government managers looking to recover ground they lost to opposition over FDI in retail where a retreat looks like a rout.

The panel's decisions on the important banking and insurance bills threaten to take the wind out of government's reforms agenda. While discussing the banking bill, MPs felt the government must reconsider its proposal on giving voting rights to investors equal to their shareholding.

The MPs felt that putting a cap on voting rights at 26% would be appropriate at this juncture which can be reviewed at a later stage, sources said. The members, however, agreed to keep bank mergers outside the purview of the Competition Commission.

On the issue of UIDAI Bill, members pointed out inconsistencies in the government's stand with several ministries raising objections on execution and finances of the project. The MPs raised objection on no singular authority mandated to enroll all citizens for the Unique ID project. While UIDAI is mandated to enroll up to 20 crore in the first phase, the registrar general has also been asked simultaneously to enroll for UID card.