In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, July 9, 2012

2648 - Anti-social aadhar - Pune Mirror


Residents of two localities in Yerwada perplexed as drunk men identifying themselves as ‘social workers’, turn up to deliver UID card
Nadeem Inamdar
Posted On Friday, July 06, 2012 at 08:30:32 AM

Sheetal Kamble received the Aadhar card last Monday through a self-acclaimed social worker

When her doorbell rang, last Monday, Sheetal Kamble opened the door to find a stranger at her doorstep. “He was reeking of alcohol,” she recalls. If she found that offensive, there was more to come.

The inebriated young man was there to deliver her ‘Aadhar card’ — the unique identification card, which is considered a vital document for the future and a highly confidential one at that.

Kamble mistook the man for an employee of the Postal Department, only to be told that he was just a ‘social worker’ passing on the document.

What is worrying is that Kamble is not the only recipient of this unlikely courier. Residents of Panchsheel Nagar and Hussain Shah Baba Nagar, located at Commerzone in Yerwada have been answering doors to unidentified youth showing up with their Aadhar cards, mostly after 9 pm. These strangers identify themselves as ‘social workers’, but the residents are not impressed.

They are aware that the job of distribution of the Aadhar cards has been given to the postal department. They do not understand how and when these so called “social workers” became bonafide couriers of the critical document. 

To Ratnamala Chavan, who like Kamble lives in Hussain Shah Baba Nagar,  this trend smacks of sheer irresponsibility on the part of the postal department. “What happens if our Aadhar cards are lost?” she asked. “Worse, what if they are found in wrong hands? At that time, the police will not take our word and instead make trouble for us,” she expressed her fears.

Kuldeep Ghodke, a resident of Panchsheel Nagar, is equally indignant. The Yerwada suburban post office has a pile of Aadhar cards lying around undelivered, he says. 

“The postal department has devised an ingenious strategy to shirk their responsibility and outsourced it to strangers masquerading as social groups,” he observed. He too is worried. 

“Who will guarantee that our Aadhar card will not get photcopied by strangers and used for their own purpose?” he asked. Ghodke is planning to petition the postal department and the state government over the issue.

The outgoing Deputy Commissioner for Aadhar Cards, Pravin Ashtikar points out that there has been agreement between the State and Union governments that the postal department would be the agency for distribution of Aadhar cards. “Individuals and social organisations cannot do it as it is to be sent only by post to the bonafide holder ,” he added.

Post Master General (Pune Division), Colonel (Retired) KC Mishra says that he is unaware of the development. “I need to find out the details,” he agreed. But K C Kamble, Senior Superintendent of Post, Pune division (East) is categorical that the postal department has not outsourced the responsibility of card distribution to any social organisation. “The cards are being sent by post and not being distributed by the social organisations,” he insisted.

Last year Union Home Minister P Chidambaram had raised doubts about safety of the data collected as part of the unique identification programme. His face-off with Nandan Nilekani, Chairperson, Unique Identity Authority of India, got finally resolved early this year. Now it turns out that the security of the Aadhar card is getting compromised by another arm of the government.