In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, July 19, 2012

2665 - For the UIDAI, not a sedate summer - Business Standard

For the UIDAI, not a sedate summer 
 Devjyot Ghoshal / New Delhi Jul 17, 2012, 00:59 IST


It is a manifestation of the Indian summer — the electricity goes out momentarily at the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) head office just before an interview with the director general and mission director, Ram Sewak Sharma.

Despite glitches, mostly more consequential than power outages, Sharma reveals that it has been a busy few months for the UIDAI, after it reached the mandated number of 200 million enrolments by March 2012.


Instead of the perception that the scheme has lost some momentum, according to Sharma, the UIDAI has taken time to learn from the past year of enrolments and applications, while preparing for a massive outreach that will not only see 400 million more Indians becoming part of the Aadhaar programme over the next 18 months, but also a rollout of UID-based payments in 50 districts across the country.

NEW ROAD MAP
Some other features of the refreshed enrolment strategy
  • Establishment of long-term enrolment stations
  • Registrars to draw up detailed enrolment plans and review Pincode database
  • Payment of timely & adequate wages to operators and supervisors, so that local labour laws are not violated
  • On-the-job training for operators and supervisors
  • UID generation for operators/supervisors/introducers within 5 days
* A beneficiary undertakes an UID-enabled payment in Jharkhand's Tarup village in March.

But the focus of the UIDAI’s recent efforts has been to improve its enrolment mechanism, which has meant a re-examination of both its devices and processes, and it has started at the very heart of this technology-driven exercise — the software, which has been upgraded from version 1.3.4 to version 2.1.

“We have added new features in the software that captures the data. For example, we now have the provision of GPS, which will capture the location from where the data is being captured,” says Sharma. “A lot of these systems and process have been put in place, which ensure better accountability and traceability of the enrolment process, and quality."

There is a mandatory sync cycle, too, which ensures that the information held in a mobile biometric device is synced with the UIDAI’s Central Identities Data Repository every 10 days, Sharma adds, because they found that the average delay in uploading the packet by the enrolment agencies was 40 days.
“That is huge, and it makes it difficult to get an Aadhaar card in 60 days, especially since it will also take 20 days for the letter to reach the recipient,” he explains, “So now, you (the enrolment agencies) have to sync, have to tell me (UIDAI, how many enrolment have happened) or software will freeze if you don’t upload the (data) packets.”

Yet, there are many among the millions enrolled by the UIDAI who can’t fully utilise Aadhaar, primarily due to mistakes made during enrolment, which is why demographic and procedural errors will now invite penalties up to Rs 500.

Moreover, the presence of verifiers, usually serving or retired government employees, will be sought during enrolment to further bolster the process.
The summer has also allowed the UIDAI to fix one of its biggest procedural flaws — the postal delay in the UID numbers reaching the beneficiaries. The agreement between the Authority and India Post to print and post the numbers wasn’t working because the latter just didn’t have enough printing capacity, particularly when Aadhaar enrolments where as much as one million per day.

So, India Post was tasked with only dispatching the numbers and instead, three private printers were brought in. Only now is the backlog finally clearing out, senior UIDAI officials attest.
“In some sense, we have had time to refresh our strategy. We have been able to fine-tune our systems, absorb the learning. We have already done 20 crore (200 million, enrolments) and we will do 40 crore as well. In 18 months, we’ll achieve the target. There’s no doubt on that part,” Sharma says.

But Sharma has no illusions about the next 18 months being an easy ride, as the UIDAI slowly shifts its focus from enrolments to actual applications of the platforms, like Public Distribution System (PDS) and Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) payments.

“Applications are an complicated issue. You have banks as a partner, beneficiaries, the databases, the departments, and you have to re-engineer the application because you have go from a manual or semi-automatic system to a completely electronic payment system. So, that’s a huge paradigm shift and obviously, the success of that will depend on the state government initiatives,” he adds.

The bigger concern, though, across the UIDAI’s brass is that of political resistance to the scheme, as the applications are rolled out across the country, thereby eliminating ghost beneficiaries and subsidy payment leakages. Even an entire summer of planning may not be enough to deal with that.