In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, February 2, 2013

2881 - Dash for cash


Dash for cash
Author(s): Jyotika Sood
Date: Dec 31, 2012

Government unprepared but goes ahead with direct cash transfer

Photo: Reuters

THE Centre seems to have not done its homework before announcing the ambitious project of Aadhaar-based Direct Cash Transfer (DCT). Under the project, the government will transfer subsidies or payouts directly to the beneficiary’s bank or post office account. Officials in the government are sceptical if the DCT system can be kicked off in the prescribed time-frames because ground reality differs from what is perceived by politicians.
In November, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced the launch of DCT. Under the first phase, pilot projects will be undertaken in 51 districts across 15 states and three Union Territories from January 1, 2013. The system will then be expanded to 18 states from April 1, 2013, and to the rest of the country from April 1, 2014. “The main difficulty I have is with the timelines that have been set,” says Planning Commission member Mihir Shah. “A lot of work remains to be done, especially on issuing Aadhaar numbers, financial inclusion and Internet connectivity. All these cannot be achieved within the specified timelines and without these it is not possible to roll out the direct cash transfer,” Shah adds.
Under the project, every beneficiary must have an Aadhaar number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). It is issued after taking an individual’s biometrics: fingerprints and iris scan. Once people receive Aadhaar numbers, they can go and withdraw the money transferred to their accounts through a banking correspondent by authenticating their biometrics on a hand-held device.
But given the pace at which UIDAI is issuing Aadhaar numbers, a major chunk of the beneficiaries are likely to be missed in the first phase of DCT. Since September 29, 2010, when the first Aadhaar number was issued, UIDAI has covered only 18.6 per cent of the country’s population. This means on an average only nine per cent of country’s population receives Aadhaar numbers a year.
An analysis of the UIDAI data and the 2011 census by Down To Earth further shows that in 22 of the 51 districts that will be covered under DCT in the first phase, 50 per cent of the population have not enrolled themselves for Aadhaar numbers. In Rajasthan and Gujarat, enrolment is as low as 13.55 per cent and 5.78 per cent, respectively. Aadhaar enrolment in Hyderabad is 4,989,365, while according to the census, population of the city is just 4,010,238. The question is has the census missed out 900,000 people or is UIDAI goofing up?
The many challenges
Of the 50 Centrally sponsored schemes, the government has shortlisted 34 for direct cash transfers. Majority of these schemes are educational scholarships and fellowships, benefits for pregnant women, housing subsidy for beedi workers and some pension programmes. Sources in the Planning Commission say schemes like the Public Distribution System and Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment guarantee Scheme have a vast coverage. Schemes with less number of beneficiaries have been shortlisted under the project so that they can be implemented properly. But in the first phase, the system would be limited to only 29 schemes. The schemes were not identified till the magazine went to print.

Another challenge has been posed by the Department of Financial Services’ proposal to create “one cluster, one banking correspondent” for all the schemes. As per the proposal, the country would be split into 20 clusters. Each cluster will have one common banking correspondent company. It would be the only conduit through which cash transfers will flow from banks to beneficiaries.
The problem, according to Shah, lies in entrusting such a vital role to just one company. This will inevitably result in monopolistic tendencies. Companies are already putting in incredibly low bids to win these clusters. For an industry that has been saying that a 2 per cent margin is not enough, bids have ranged between 0.86 per cent to even as low as an absurd minus 0.06 per cent, Shah adds.
To ensure that the deadline is met, the prime minister has asked UIDAI to set up a dedicated cell of technical experts to facilitate Aadhaar-enabled direct cash transfers and help individual ministries. He has also asked the concerned departments both in the Centre and states to digitise their database quickly, with the help of the Department of Information and Technology and the National Informatics Centre (NIC).
Speaking to Down To Earth, a senior official from NIC, however, says digitisation of schemes cannot be done in a month. Ministries may have prepared guidelines and roadmaps on how to go ahead but the whole process will take time as everything, for example records of the state and Central governments, need to be digitised and synced. Moreover, connectivity in remote areas and villages is a big challenge which even mobile companies have failed to overcome, he adds.
However, Shah is hopeful. Cash transfers are already taking place where school students are getting scholarships and fellowships. The only change DCT will bring about is that instead of going to various government departments to collect this money, the beneficiary will now have the money directly credited to her/his bank or post office account, he adds.