In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, February 3, 2013

2889 - AP still unprepared for DCTS




K. VENKATESHWARLU

Andhra Pradesh
Hyderabad

Not many in the government and among the Collectors of five districts where the scheme is to be launched appear confident

With 11 days left for the roll out of the UPA government’s Direct Cash Transfer Scheme (DCTS) promoted with a catchy tag line, ‘Aap ka paisa Aap ke haath’ across the country on January 1, the Congress government in Andhra Pradesh, seems ill-prepared so far.

Not many in the government and among the Collectors of five districts where the scheme is to be launched appeared fully confident of completing the gargantuan task of achieving the crucial linkage of Aadhar number with the savings bank accounts of all the beneficiaries in such a short span, to enable drawing of cash. On the other hand banks too have not yet this process into motion.

Stringent criterion

In fact, none of the government officials could vouch for the fulfilment of the stringent criterion of 95 per cent coverage of Aadhar cards in districts, set by the Centre for implementation of the DCTS. Though Andhra Pradesh played a lead role in enrolment of Aadhar card, no where it was 95 per cent while the average for the State stood at 80 per cent, an official revealed.

It meant a question mark over the implementation of DCTS in the five selected districts -- Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, East Godavari, Anantapur and Chittoor. When the card itself has not reached all the beneficiaries how could it move forward with its linkage to the bank accounts, leave alone ensuring drawal of cash?

Challenging task

Many officials describe it as a “challenging task to be achieved in ten days flat”. The State’s achievement in Aadhar enrolment and use of technology in schemes like disbursement of scholarships should have given a head start but the problem is with the missing links. For instance, majority of the weaker section students whose disbursements now go into their bank accounts do not have Aadhar numbers. It means the scholarship disbursement identified as one of the 34 “immediately implementable programmes” cannot take off in the next few days.

Similarly, though the Civil Supplies Department now has reasonable perfection in Aadhar number based supply of commodities and could have experimented with kerosene, the Centre has put off DCTS for cooking fuel to a later phase, “as the subsidy component is too complex an issue”.

Lack of clarity

Apart from such instances of mismatch, there were other loose ends. There is no clarity on flow of funds from Centre to the beneficiary and how the subsidy amounts would be shared by Centre and the State and whether there would be a State-level nodal agency to coordinate and monitor DCTS. “All we know is the Centre is keen on dispatching funds directly to the beneficiaries to check leakage,” an official observed.

Confusion persists on whether 34 schemes would be spread over the entire district in one go or “piloted” in a few areas. Some officials cautioned against rolling out cash schemes in “such a tearing hurry”.